Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Francia, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Francia, S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

DNA damage response defects induced by the formation of TDP-43 and mutant FUS cytoplasmic inclusions and their pharmacological rescue.

Formation of cytoplasmic inclusions (CIs) of TDP-43 and FUS, along with DNA damage accumulation, is a hallmark of affected motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). However, the impact of CIs on DNA damage response (DDR) and repair in this pathology remains unprobed. Here, we show that CIs of TDP-43 and FUSP525L, co-localizing with stress granules, lead to a dysfunctional DDR activation associated with physical DNA breakage. Inhibition of the activity of the DDR kinase ATM, but not of ATR, abolishes DDR signaling, indicating that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the primary source of DDR activation. In addition, cells with TDP-43 and FUSP525L CIs exhibit reduced DNA damage-induced RNA synthesis at DSBs. We previously showed that the two endoribonucleases DROSHA and DICER, also known to interact with TDP-43 and FUS during small RNA processing, contribute to DDR signaling at DSBs. Treatment with enoxacin, which stimulates DDR and repair by boosting the enzymatic activity of DICER, restores a proficient DDR and reduces DNA damage accumulation in cultured cells with CIs and in vivo in a murine model of ALS. In Drosophila melanogaster, Dicer-2 overexpression rescues TDP-43-mediated retinal degeneration. In summary, our results indicate that the harmful effects caused by TDP-43 and FUS proteinopathies include genotoxic stress and that the pharmacological stimulation of the DNA damage signaling and repair counteracts it.

molecular biology↗

DROSHA, DICER and Damage-Induced long ncRNA control BMI1-dependent transcriptional repression at DNA double-strand break

Genome integrity is safeguarded by the DNA damage response (DDR). Controlled transcriptional dampening of genes surrounding DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has been shown to facilitate DNA repair. This phenomenon, defined as DSB-induced silencing in cis (DISC), involves the DDR apical kinase ATM and the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1). Conversely, DSBs have also been reported to induce de novo transcription of damaged-induced long non-coding RNAs (dilncRNAs) in a MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MNR) complex-dependent manner. MRN also controls the recruitment to DSB of the ribonuclease DROSHA, which together with DICER, stimulates DDR signaling and DNA repair. Here, we reconcile these apparently contrasting observations by showing that dilncRNA, together with DROSHA and DICER, but not GW182-like proteins required for miRNA-mediated gene silencing, controls DISC. Indeed, similarly to ATM, MRN inhibition abolishes DISC while pharmacological enhancement of DICER ribonuclease activity by Enoxacin improves DISC. Importantly, Enoxacin administration restores DISC upon ATM inhibition, demonstrating that DICER promotes DISC independently from ATM. Differently, Enoxacin does not restore DISC upon MRN inhibition, suggesting that DICER acts downstream to dilncRNA biogenesis and DROSHA recruitment. Mechanistically, we show that DROSHA and DICER control the recruitment of the PRC1 component BMI1 at DSBs and the consequent H2A-K119 ubiquitination. Upon DSBs formation, BMI1 and DROSHA interact in an RNA-dependent manner. Indeed, BMI1 associates to dilncRNA and do so in a DROSHA- and DICER-dependent manner. Importantly, inhibition of dilncRNA function by antisense oligonucleotides or Cas13-mediated targeting is sufficient to reduce BMI1 recruitment and DISC at individual loci. We propose that dilncRNAs together with DROSHA and DICER control DISC at genomic DSB by supporting PRC1 recruitment and chromatin ubiquitination.

molecular biology↗

P3HT-GRAPHENE DEVICE FOR THE RESTORATION OF VISUAL PROPERTIES IN A RAT MODEL OF RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA

Retinal degeneration is one of the prevalent causes of blindness worldwide, for which no effective treatment has yet been identified. Inorganic photovoltaic devices have been investigated for visual restoration in advanced stage Retinitis pigmentosa (RP), although lack of implant flexibility and foreign-object reactions have limited their application. Organic photoactive retinal prostheses may overcome these limitations, being biomimetic and tissue friendly. Inspired by organic photovoltaic strategies involving graphene, a hybrid retinal prosthesis was recently engineered consisting of a dual poly-3-hexylthiophene (P3HT) and graphene layer onto a flexible substrate. Here, this hybrid prosthesis was subretinally implanted in vivo in 5-month-old Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats, a rodent model of RP. Implanted dystrophic rats restored visual performances at both subcortical and cortical levels in response to light stimuli, in the absence of marked inflammatory responses. Moreover, the analysis of the physical-mechanical properties after prolonged permanence in the eye showed excellent biocompatibility and robustness of the device. Overall, the results demonstrate that graphene-enhanced organic photovoltaic devices can be suitably employed for the rescue of retinal dystrophies and supports the translation of the organic strategy into the medical practice. TABLE OF CONTENTSInspired by organic photovoltaic, a hybrid retinal prosthesis consisting of poly-3-hexylthiophene (P3HT) and graphene on a flexible substrate was subretinally implanted in vivo in Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats, a model of Retinitis pigmentosa. Implanted dystrophic rats restored visual performances at both subcortical and cortical levels in response to light stimuli, in the absence of marked inflammatory responses. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=37 SRC="FIGDIR/small/507903v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cb30a0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e57c2corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3b3c8corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10442d7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

neuroscience↗

TGS1 controls snRNA 3' end processing, prevents neurodegeneration and ameliorates SMN-dependent neurological phenotypes in vivo

Trimethylguanosine synthase 1 (TGS1) is a highly conserved enzyme that converts the 5 mono-methylguanosine cap of snRNAs to a trimethylguanosine cap. Here, we show that loss of TGS1 in C. elegans, D. melanogaster and D. rerio results in neurological phenotypes similar to those caused by Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) deficiency. Importantly, expression of human TGS1 ameliorates the SMN-dependent neurological phenotypes in both flies and worms, revealing that TGS1 can partly counteract the effects of SMN deficiency. TGS1 loss in HeLa cells leads to the accumulation of immature U2 and U4atac snRNAs with long 3 tails that are often uridylated. snRNAs with defective 3 terminations also accumulate in Drosophila Tgs1 mutants. Consistent with defective snRNA maturation, TGS1 and SMN mutant cells also exhibit partially overlapping transcriptome alterations that include aberrantly spliced and readthrough transcripts. Together, these results identify a neuroprotective function for TGS1 and reinforce the view that defective snRNA maturation affects neuronal viability and function.

genetics↗

DROSHA associates to DNA damage sites and is required for DNA repair

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade through which a cell recognizes DNA lesions, and promotes their resolution via the repair pathways of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ), or Homologous Recombination (HR). We recently demonstrated that DROSHA boosts DDR signaling by processing damage-induced long non-coding RNAs into smaller DNA damage response RNAs (DDRNAs). However, the location at which DROSHA exerts its DDR functions, relative to sites of DNA damage, remains unknown.\n\nTo investigate DROSHAs localization during DDR activation, we used the DiVA cellular system, which allows the controlled induction of several DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in the human genome. Indeed, by genome wide chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing, we demonstrate that DROSHA associates with DSBs. In support of this, DSB-recruitment of DROSHA is detectable at the single-cell level by Proximity Ligation Assay between DROSHA and known DDR markers, and by DNA damage in situ ligation followed by Proximity Ligation Assay (DI-PLA), which demonstrates proximity of DROSHA to DNA ends. DROSHA recruitment occurs at both genic and inter-genic DSBs, suggesting that its recruitment is independent from ongoing transcription preceding damage generation. DROSHAs recruitment to DNA lesions occurs throughout the cell cycle, and with a preference for NHEJ-prone DSBs. Consistently, inhibition of the HR pathway increases DROSHA recruitment, and DROSHA knock down strongly impairs NHEJ efficiency in a GFP-reporter cellular system for monitoring NHEJ DNA repair. Overall, these results demonstrate that DROSHA acts locally at sites of DNA damage to promote NHEJ DNA repair.

cell biology↗