Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Francardo, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Francardo, V..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell- and state-specific plasticity of striatal glutamatergic synapses is critical to the expression of levodopa-induced dyskinesia

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is a debilitating complication of symptomatic therapy in Parkinsons disease (PD). Although there is compelling evidence that striatal pathophysiology is a major driver of LID, the circuit-specific mechanisms contributing to dysfunction remain obscure. This lack of clarity is reflected in the limited options for diminishing established LID. To address this gap, molecular, cellular, and behavioral strategies were used to interrogate striatal indirect pathway spiny projection neurons (iSPNs) in a mouse model of LID. These studies revealed that LID induction led to an up-regulation of GluN2B-containing N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) specifically at iSPN glutamatergic synapses. This up-regulation was correlated with increased numbers of silent glutamatergic synapses in the hours after levodopa treatment. In this off-state, long-term potentiation (LTP) of iSPN glutamatergic synapses was readily induced and this induction was blocked by antagonists of adenosine type 2 receptors (A2aRs) or GluN2B-containing NMDARs. Systemic administration of the A2aR antagonist tozedenant at the beginning of the off-state significantly reduced the development of LID. More importantly, specifically knocking down the expression of GRIN2B mRNA in iSPNs dramatically attenuated both development and expression of LID, without compromising the beneficial effects of levodopa on movement. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that dyskinesiogenic doses of levodopa trigger cell-specific synaptic adaptations during the off-state that make an important contribution to the network pathophysiology underlying LID and suggest that targeting GluN2B-containing NMDARs in iSPNs could be therapeutically useful.

neuroscience↗

Drug-free nasal spray as a barrier against SARS-CoV-2 infection: safety and efficacy in human nasal airway epithelia

BackgroundFor SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses, the nasal epithelium is a key portal for infection. Therefore, the nose is an important target of prophylactic and therapeutic interventions against these viruses. We developed a nasal spray (AM-301, a medical device marketed as Bentrio) to protect against infection by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other viruses. Aims of the studyTo test the safety and efficacy of AM-301 against SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsAM-301 was tested on an in vitro 3D model of primary human nasal airway epithelium. Safety was assessed in assays for tight junction integrity, cytotoxicity and cilia beating frequency. Efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated in prophylaxis and infection mitigation assays. ResultsAM-301 did not have any detrimental effect on the nasal epithelium. Prophylactic treatment with AM-301 reduced viral titer significantly vs. controls over 4 days, reaching a maximum reduction of 99%. When treatment with AM-301 was started 24 or 30 h after infection, epithelia that received the formulation had a 12- or 14-fold lower titer than controls. ConclusionAM-301 was found to be safe in vitro, and it significantly decelerated viral titer growth in experimental models of prophylaxis and mitigation. Its physical (non-pharmaceutical) mechanism of action, safety and efficacy pave the way for further investigation of its possible use against a broad spectrum of viruses, allergens and pollutants.

pharmacology and toxicology↗