Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Florea, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Florea, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

In vivo gene disruption and homology-directed repair in muscles and muscle stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9

Programmable endonucleases such as CRISPR/Cas9 provide powerful tools to edit mammalian genomes by engaging cellular mechanisms of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. CRISPR-catalysed homology-directed repair (CRISPR-HDR), though generally less efficient than other modes of DNA repair, holds particular promise to enable precise sequence replacement by targeted insertion of a homologous DNA template1,2. While recent studies have reported appreciable levels of HDR in cardiomyocytes in vivo3, skeletal muscle myofibres have historically been considered refractory to HDR-mediated genome editing4. Furthermore, how repair outcomes differ across tissues after systemic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 editors, whether precise HDR editing can be achieved in regenerative tissue stem cells, and how developmental timing influences accessibility to CRISPR-induced repair remain unclear. Here, we use an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-delivered in vivo GFP-to-BFP colour-switching reporter system (AAV-GFP-to-BFP) to examine in vivo CRISPR-HDR with cellular- and tissue-level resolution. We find that postnatal cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, and muscle stem cells undergo templated HDR at different rates across discrete developmental stages in mice. While HDR-edited muscle stem cells and myofibres were readily detectable after in vivo editing in juvenile mice, editing in neonatal mice yielded more efficient HDR in cardiac tissue. Based on these results, we adapted the CRISPR-HDR approach to rescue the therapeutically relevant Dmd mutation in mdx mice, demonstrating recoding to the wild-type protein sequence in both skeletal and cardiac muscles. These results provide a framework for advancing donor-templated DNA repair in living postnatal animals, and reveal unexpected cellular, developmental, and disease-related constraints on precise, therapeutic in vivo gene correction.

cell biology↗

Longevity Bottlenecks

The longevity field has received an influx of capital and talent over the past 5 years, but it is unclear where directing these resources would result in the biggest positive impact. We aimed to establish a systematic, rigorous and unbiased way to identify the areas where increased investment would accelerate progress across the whole longevity field the most. To do so, we surveyed [~]400 participants across various sectors of longevity, asking them to 1) identify the major bottlenecks they are experiencing, 2) list their most needed solution, and 3) rate the potential efficacy and barriers to development of various aging intervention strategies. We built a classification system of Bottlenecks and Solutions based on grouping related answers and found the most frequently listed bottlenecks to be 1) lack of validated aging biomarkers; 2) an overall lack of funding; and 3) lack of good models for aging studies. Surprisingly, the most wanted solution was greater availability of large public datasets. Indeed, a common theme across all answers was the need for a new data-centric structure of scientific research, where large datasets are routinely gathered and made available, access walls are removed, protocols are standardized, negative and unpublished data are shared, and AI systems are released on the data for automated discovery. Finally, a lack of regulatory clarity was listed as the biggest barrier to development across all interventions, whereas cellular reprogramming, organ replacement, and genetic medicine (gene therapies and gene editing) were perceived as the intervention strategies with the highest potential for increasing healthy lifespan. We provide these data as a resource for funding agencies, philanthropists, entrepreneurs and newcomers to the field as a means to identify high impact areas to fund and work on. Key takeawaysO_LI395 Participants were surveyed for their biggest bottlenecks and most needed solutions C_LIO_LITop Bottlenecks: lack of Validated Biomarkers; Overall lack of Funding and Slow & Expensive Models. C_LIO_LITop proposed Solutions: more Public Datasets; improved Regulatory Path; and Overall More Funding. C_LIO_LIBottlenecks and Solutions vary substantially across industry areas. C_LIO_LIRapamycin and calorie restriction are perceived as the most efficacious interventions in the near term. C_LIO_LISomatic reprogramming, organ replacement, and genetic medicine are perceived as the most efficacious interventions in the long term (25 years). C_LIO_LISirtuin and NAD targeting therapies are seen as the least efficacious interventions in all time-frames. C_LIO_LIAcross all interventions, Regulatory Issues are perceived as the most severely inhibiting factor in the development of the intervention. C_LI

scientific communication and education↗