Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Floel, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Floel, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

An accessible and versatile deep learning-based sleep stage classifier

Manual sleep analysis for research purposes and for the diagnosis of sleep disorders is labor-intensive and often produces unreliable results, which has motivated many attempts to design automatic sleep stage classifiers. With the recent introduction of large, publicly available hand-scored polysomnographic data, and concomitant advances in machine learning methods to solve complex classification problems with supervised learning, the problem has received new attention, and a number of new classifiers that provide excellent accuracy. Most of these however have non-trivial barriers to use. We introduce the Greifswald Sleep Stage Classifier (GSSC), which is free, open source, and can be relatively easily installed and used on any moderately powered computer. In addition, the GSSC has been trained to perform well on a large variety of electrode set-ups, allowing high performance sleep staging with portable systems. The GSSC can also be readily integrated into brain-computer interfaces for real-time inference. These innovations were achieved while simultaneously reaching a level of accuracy equal to, or exceeding, recent state of the art classifiers and human experts, making the GSSC an excellent choice for researchers in need of reliable, automatic sleep staging.

neuroscience↗

Towards optimization of oscillatory stimulation during sleep

BackgroundOscillatory rhythms during sleep such as slow oscillations (SO) and spindles, and most importantly their coupling, are thought to underlie processes of memory consolidation. External slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) with a frequency of 0.75 Hz has been shown to improve this coupling and memory consolidation, however, effects varied quite markedly between individuals, studies, and species. Here, we aimed to determine how precisely the frequency of stimulation has to match the naturally occurring SO frequency in individuals to optimally improve SO-spindle coupling. Moreover, we systematically tested stimulation durations necessary to induce changes. MethodsWe addressed these questions by comparing so-tDCS with individualized frequency to standardized frequency of 0.75 Hz in a within-subject design with 28 older participants during napping while systematically varying stimulation train durations between 30 s, 2 min, and 5 min. ResultsStimulation trains as short as 30 s were sufficient to modulate the coupling between SOs and spindle activity. Contrary to our expectations, so-tDCS with standardized frequency indicated stronger aftereffects with regard to SO-spindle coupling compared to individualized frequency. Angle and variance of spindle maxima occurrence during the SO cycle were similarly modulated. ConclusionIn sum, short stimulation trains were sufficient to induce significant changes in sleep physiology allowing for more trains of stimulation, which provides methodological advantages and possibly even larger behavioral effects in future studies. With regard to individualized stimulation frequency, further options of optimization need to be investigated, such as closed-loop stimulation to calibrate stimulation frequency to the SO frequency at time of stimulation onset. Significance statementApplication of slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep has been shown to enhance specific memory-relevant sleep parameters and memory performance after sleep, albeit with a high degree of variability. Here, we systematically explored two major stimulation parameters possibly accounting for this variability in humans: frequency and duration of stimulation. We found, contrary to our expectations, standardized frequency stimulation with 0.75 Hz being superior to individualized frequency stimulation in enhancing specific sleep parameters. Moreover short stimulation trains of 30 seconds were as effective as 5 min in modulating aftereffects. These are encouraging findings, implying methodological advantages as larger quantity of aftereffects data can be obtained within the same time window, which may also lead to enhanced behavioral stimulation effects.

neuroscience↗

Weight loss reduces head motion: re-visiting a major confound in neuroimaging

Head motion during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) induces image artifacts that affect virtually every brain measure. In parallel, cross-sectional observations indicate a correlation of head motion with age, psychiatric disease status and obesity, raising the possibility of a systematic artifact-induced bias in neuroimaging outcomes in these conditions, due to the differences in head motion. Yet, a causal link between obesity and head motion has not been tested in an experimental design. Here, we show that a change in body mass index (i.e., weight loss after bariatric surgery) systematically decreases head motion during MRI. In this setting, reduced imaging artifacts due to lower head motion might result in biased estimates of neural differences induced by changes in BMI. Overall, our finding urges the need to rigorously control for within-scanner head motion to enable valid results of neuroimaging outcomes in populations that differ in head motion due to obesity or other conditions.

neuroscience↗

Transcranial stimulation enhances memory-relevant sleep oscillations and their functional coupling in mild cognitive impairment

Alzheimers disease (AD) not only involves loss of memory functions but also prominent deterioration of sleep physiology, already evident in the stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cortical slow oscillations (SO, 0.5-1 Hz) and thalamo-cortical spindle activity (12-15 Hz) during sleep, and their temporal coordination, are considered critical for memory formation. We investigated the potential of slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS), applied during a daytime nap in a sleep state-dependent manner, to modulate these activity patterns and sleep-related memory consolidation in 16 patients with MCI.\n\nStimulation significantly increased overall SO and spindle power, amplified spindle power during SO up-phases, and led to stronger synchronization between SO and spindle power fluctuations in electroencephalographic recordings. Moreover, visual declarative memory was improved by so-tDCS compared to sham stimulation, associated with stronger synchronization. These findings indicate a well-tolerated therapeutic approach for disordered sleep physiology and deficits in memory consolidation in MCI patients.

neuroscience↗