Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Flanagan, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Flanagan, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A shared functional architecture for error-based and reinforcement-based motor learning in the human brain

The motor system can flexibly learn from fundamentally different teaching signals, from directional errors to rewards. While computational and neurobiological models have long assigned these to distinct error-based learning (EL) and reinforcement-based learning (RL) processes, whether this separation holds at the level of whole-brain network architecture has not been directly tested. Here, we characterized whole-brain functional connectivity manifolds in the same participants as they performed separate EL and RL motor tasks -- differing in both feedback type and motor structure -- during two fMRI sessions. By jointly embedding covariance patterns from both tasks into a common low-dimensional neural space, we isolated task-general from task-specific learning-related network reconfigurations. We show that both forms of motor learning induce converging changes in the manifold structure of higher-order transmodal cortex, with comparatively limited task-specific modulation. Notably, this convergence extended to the cerebellum and basal ganglia, the canonical substrates of error-based and reward-based learning, which reconfigured comparably across both tasks. Against this shared backdrop, we found that the posterior medial cortex exhibited a unique functional geometry, selectively redistributing its connectivity across distinct brain circuits depending on feedback type and learning stage. We further demonstrate that individual differences in domain-general motor learning ability are associated with stage-dependent reconfigurations within limbic, default-mode, and attentional systems. These findings indicate that flexible motor adaptation, irrespective of the nature of the learning signal, is supported less by changes within task-specific sensorimotor circuits than by the dynamic reorganization of higher-order brain networks that coordinate them.

neuroscience↗

Gaze Behaviour During Sensorimotor Adaptation Parcellates the Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning

Successful motor performance relies on our ability to adapt to changes in the environment by learning novel mappings between motor commands and sensory outcomes. Such adaptation is thought to involve two distinct mechanisms: An implicit, error-based component linked to slow learning and an explicit, strategic component linked to fast learning and savings (i.e., faster relearning). Because behaviour, at any given moment, is the resultant combination of these two processes, it has remained a challenge to parcellate their relative contributions to performance. The explicit component to visuomotor rotation (VMR) learning has recently been measured by having participants verbally report their aiming strategy used to counteract the rotation. However, this procedure has been shown to magnify the explicit component. Here we tested whether task-specific eye movements, a natural component of reach planning--but poorly studied in motor learning tasks--can provide a direct read-out of the state of the explicit component during VMR learning. We show, by placing targets on a visible ring and including a delay between target presentation and reach onset, that individual differences in gaze patterns during sensorimotor adaptation are linked to participants rates of learning and can predict the expression of savings. Specifically, we find that participants who, during reach planning, naturally fixate an aimpoint, rotated away from the target location, show faster initial adaptation and readaptation 24 hrs. later. Our results demonstrate that gaze behaviour can not only uniquely identify individuals who implement cognitive strategies during learning, but also how their implementation is linked to differences in learning.

neuroscience↗