Biology subjects

Filmer, H. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Filmer, H. L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Not Quite All in Our Head: Intervention is a Better Predictor of tDCS Mind-Wandering Effects than Subjective Beliefs About Experimental Results

BackgroundEstablishing adequate blinding for non-invasive brain stimulation research is a topic of extensive debate, especially regarding the efficacy of sham control methods for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies. Fassi and Cohen Kadosh [1] assessed the influence of subjective participant belief regarding stimulation type (active or sham) and dosage on behaviour using data from Filmer et al. [2] who applied five stimulation protocols (anodal 1.0mA, cathodal 1.0mA, cathodal 1.5mA, cathodal 2.0mA and sham) to assess the neural substrates of mind wandering. Fassi and Cohen Kadosh [1] concluded that subjective belief drove the pattern of results observed by Filmer et al. [2]. ObjectiveFassi and Cohen Kadosh [1] did not assess the key contrast between conditions in Filmer et al. (2019) - 2mA vs sham - rather they examined all stimulation conditions. Here, we consider the relationship between objective and subjective intervention in this key contrast. MethodsWe replicated the analysis and findings of both Filmer et al. [2] and Fassi and Cohen Kadosh [1] before assessing 2mA vs. sham via Bayesian ANOVA on subjective belief regarding stimulation type and dosage. ResultsOur results support objective intervention as the strongest predictor of stimulation effects on mind-wandering when 2mA vs sham was examined, over and above that of subjective intervention. ConclusionsThe conclusions made by Filmer et al. [2] are confirmed. However, it is important to control for and understand the possible effects of subjective beliefs in sham-controlled studies. Best practice to prevent these issues remains the inclusion of active control conditions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Age-related differences in the role of the prefrontal cortex in sensory-motor training gains: A tDCS study

The ability to process multiple sources of information concurrently is particularly impaired as individuals age and such age-related increases in multitasking costs have been linked to impairments in response selection. Previous neuroimaging studies with young adults have implicated the left hemisphere prefrontal cortex (PFC) as a key neural substrate of response selection. In addition, several transcranial direct current stimulation studies (tDCS) have provided causal evidence implicating this region in response selection and multitasking operations. For example, Filmer at al. (2013b) demonstrated that typically observed response selection learning/training gains in young adults were disrupted via offline transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of left, but not right, PFC. Here, considering evidence of functional dedifferentiation in the brains of older adults, we assessed if this pattern of response selection learning disruption via tDCS to the left PFC is observed in older adults, testing if this region remains a key response selection node as individuals age. In a pre-registered study with 58 older adults, we applied anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation to left and right PFC, and measured performance as participants trained on low- and high-response selection load tasks. Active stimulation did not disrupt training in older adults as compared to younger adults. However, there was evidence of enhanced training gains via tDCS, which scaled with response selection task difficulty. The results highlight age-related differences in the casual neural substrates that subserve response selection and learning.

neuroscience↗