Ferreira, G. B. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Sustainable cattle management by communities supports African wildlife

Community-based conservation (CBC) initiatives aim to reconcile biodiversity protection with local livelihoods, yet their effectiveness in protecting wildlife remains uncertain, often hinging on local management1,2. We evaluated a globally significant CBC model in Kenyas Greater Maasai Mara Ecosystem (GME), where conservancies, run jointly by Maasai landowners and the tourism sector, employ rotational cattle grazing to support both wildlife and pastoralism3,4. Using a [~]1200 km2 grid of 180 camera traps across gradients of livestock pressure in Maasai Mara National Reserve and three conservancies in 2018, we collected and analysed over 2 million images with a customised AI-powered pipeline. We found a positive impact of observed cattle pressure on mammal community occupancy and species richness, except for at the highest levels of cattle grazing. However, sheep and goat grazing and proximity to infrastructure had a negative impact. These results provide evidence that wildlife and pastoralism can coexist under community-led stewardship5, but only with active management and targeted control of emerging threats. AI tools such as our image classifier may contribute to more adaptive community-led management of these areas6. As conservation policy shifts beyond formal protected areas, our findings support CBC as a scalable model for conserving biodiversity within working landscapes, offering a pathway to meet global targets while maintaining local livelihoods7.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Biodiversity shows unique responses to land-use change across regional biomes

Biogeography has a critical influence on how ecological communities respond to threats and how effective conservation interventions are designed. For example, the resilience of ecological communities is linked to environmental and climatic features, and the nature of threats impacting ecosystems also varies geographically. Understanding community-level threat responses may be most accurate at fine spatial scales, however collecting detailed ecological data at such a high resolution would be prohibitively resource intensive. In this study, we aim to find the spatial scale that could best capture variation in community-level threat responses whilst keeping data collection requirements feasible. Using a database of biodiversity records with extensive global coverage, we modelled species richness and total abundance (the responses) across land-use types (reflecting threats), considering three different spatial scales: biomes, biogeographical realms, and regional biomes (the interaction between realm and biome). We then modelled data from three highly sampled biomes separately to ask how responses to threat differ between regional biomes and taxonomic group. We found strong support for regional biomes in explaining variation in species richness and total abundance compared to biomes or realms alone. Our biome case studies demonstrate that there is a high variation in magnitude and direction of threat responses across both regional biomes and taxonomic group, but all groups in tropical forest showed a consistently negative response, whilst many taxon-regional biome groups showed no clear response to threat in temperate forest and tropical grassland. Our results suggest that the taxon-regional biome unit has potential as a reasonable spatial and ecological scale for understanding how ecological communities respond to threats and designing effective conservation interventions to bend the curve on biodiversity loss.

ecology↗