Biology subjects

Feenstra, K. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Feenstra, K. A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

PIPENN-EMB: ensemble net and protein embeddings generalise protein interface prediction beyond homology

Protein interactions are crucial for understanding biological functions and disease mechanisms, but predicting these remains a complex task in computational biology. Increasingly, Deep Learning models are having success in interface prediction. This study presents PIPENN-EMB which explores the added value of using embeddings from the ProtT5-XL protein language model. Our results show substantial improvement over the previously published PIPENN model for protein interaction interface prediction, reaching an MCC of 0.313 vs. 0.249, and AUC-ROC 0.800 vs. 0.755 on the BIO_DL_TE test set. We furthermore show that these embeddings cover a broad range of hand-crafted protein features in ablation studies. PIPENN-EMB reaches state-of-the-art performance on the ZK448 dataset for protein-protein interface prediction. We showcase predictions on 25 resistance-related proteins from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Furthermore, whereas other state-of-the-art sequence-based methods perform worse for proteins that have little recognisable homology in their training data, PIPENN-EMB generalises to remote homologs, yielding stable AUC-ROC across all three test sets with less than 30% sequence identity to the training dataset, and even to proteins with less than 15% sequence identity. AvailabilityWebserver, source code and datasets at www.ibi.vu.nl/programs/pipennemb/

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

ProteinGLUE: A multi-task benchmark suite for self-supervised protein modeling.

Self-supervised language modeling is a rapidly developing approach for the analysis of protein sequence data. However, work in this area is heterogeneous and diverse, making comparison of models and methods difficult. Moreover, models are often evaluated only on one or two downstream tasks, making it unclear whether the models capture generally useful properties. We introduce the ProteinGLUE benchmark for the evaluation of protein representations: a set of seven tasks for evaluating learned protein representations. We also offer reference code, and we provide two baseline models with hyperparameters specifically trained for these benchmarks. Pre-training was done on two tasks, masked symbol prediction and next sentence prediction. We show that pre-training yields higher performance on a variety of downstream tasks such as secondary structure and protein interaction interface prediction, compared to no pre-training. However, the larger base model does not outperform the smaller medium. We expect the ProteinGLUE benchmark dataset introduced here, together with the two baseline pre-trained models and their performance evaluations, to be of great value to the field of protein sequence-based property prediction. Availabilitycode and datasets from https://github.com/ibivu/protein-glue

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

SeRenDIP-CE: Sequence-based Interface Prediction for Conformational Epitopes

MotivationAntibodies play an important role in clinical research and biotechnology, with their specificity determined by the interaction with the antigens epitope region, as a special type of protein-protein interaction (PPI) interface. The ubiquitous availability of sequence data, allows us to predicting epitopes from sequence in order to focus time-consuming wet-lab experiments onto the most promising epitope regions. Here, we extend our previously developed sequence-based predictors for homodimer and heterodimer PPI interfaces to predict epitope residues that have the potential to bind an antibody. ResultsWe collected and curated a high quality epitope dataset from the SAbDaB database. Our generic PPI heterodimer predictor obtained an AUC-ROC of 0.666 when evaluated on the epitope test set. We then trained a random forest model specifically on the epitope dataset, reaching AUC 0.694. Further training on the combined heterodimer and epitope datasets, improves our final predictor to AUC 0.703 on the epitope test set. This is better than the best state-of-the-art sequence-based epitope predictor BepiPred-2.0. On one solved antibody-antigen structure of the COVID19 virus spike RNA binding domain, our predictor reaches AUC 0.778. We added the SeRenDIP-CE Conformational Epitope predictors to our webserver, which is simple to use and only requires a single antigen sequence as input, which will help make the method immediately applicable in a wide range of biomedical and biomolecular research. AvailabilityWebserver, source code and datasets are available at www.ibi.vu.nl/programs/serendipwww/ Contactk.a.feenstra@vu.nl

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

The ability of transcription factors to differentially regulate gene expression is a crucial component of the mechanism underlying inversion, a frequently observed genetic interaction pattern

Genetic interactions, a phenomenon whereby combinations of mutations lead to unexpected effects, reflect how cellular processes are wired and play an important role in complex genetic diseases. Understanding the molecular basis of genetic interactions is crucial for deciphering pathway organization as well as understanding the relationship between genetic variation and disease. Several putative molecular mechanisms have been linked to different genetic interaction types. However, differences in genetic interaction patterns and their underlying mechanisms have not yet been compared systematically between different functional gene classes. Here, differences in the occurrence and types of genetic interactions are compared for two classes, gene-specific transcription factors (GSTFs) and signaling genes (kinases and phosphatases). Genome-wide gene expression data for 63 single and double deletion mutants in bakers yeast reveals that the two most common genetic interaction patterns are buffering and inversion. Buffering is typically associated with redundancy and is well understood. In inversion, genes show opposite behavior in the double mutant compared to the corresponding single mutants. The underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Although both classes show buffering and inversion patterns, the prevalence of inversion is much stronger in GSTFs. To decipher potential mechanisms, a Petri Net modeling approach was employed, where genes are represented as nodes and relationships between genes as edges. This allowed over 9 million possible three and four node models to be exhaustively enumerated. The models show that a quantitative difference in interaction strength is a strict requirement for obtaining inversion. In addition, this difference is frequently accompanied with a second gene that shows buffering. Taken together, these results provide a mechanistic explanation for inversion. Furthermore, the ability of transcription factors to differentially regulate expression of their targets provides a likely explanation why inversion is more prevalent for GSTFs compared to kinases and phosphatases.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe relationship between genotype and phenotype is one of the major challenges in biology. While many previous studies have identified genes involved in complex genetic diseases, there is still a gap between genotype and phenotype. One of the difficulties in filling this gap has been attributed to genetic interactions. Large-scale studies have revealed that genetic interactions are widespread in model organisms such as bakers yeast. Several molecular mechanisms have been proposed for different genetic interaction types. However, differences in occurrence and underlying molecular mechanism of genetic interactions have not yet been compared between gene classes of different function. Here, we compared genetic interaction patterns identified using gene expression profiling for two classes of genes: gene specific transcription factors and signaling related genes. We modelled all possible molecular networks to unravel putative molecular differences underlying different genetic interaction patterns. Our study proposes a new mechanistic explanation for a certain genetic interaction pattern that is more strongly associated with transcription factors compared to signaling related genes. Overall, our findings and the computational methodologies implemented here can be valuable for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying genetic interactions.

genetics↗