Faurie, C. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Lack of Evidence for Local Adaptation in Risk Tolerance: A Genetic Study in Northern Senegal.

Risk tolerance is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors and may be shaped by local selective pressures in hazardous environments. In Northern Senegal, fishermen from the village of Guet Ndar are chronically exposed to high occupational mortality risk, making this population a potential model for local adaptation to risky environments. In a previous study, we showed that men from this fishing community were less risk-tolerant than men from a nearby farming village, although this difference could not be explained by variation at the DRD4 locus. Here, we investigated whether genetic variants previously associated with general risk tolerance in large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) exhibit signals of local adaptation in these Senegalese populations. We genotyped 44 candidate SNPs in 373 individuals sampled from the risky fishing area and the non-risky farming area. Population genetic analyses revealed extremely low and non-significant differentiation between the two populations (mean FST = 0.0003, p = 0.33), indicating that the two groups are genetically indistinguishable at these loci. Furthermore, none of the candidate SNPs showed a significant association with experimentally measured risk tolerance after correction for multiple testing. These results provide no evidence that local adaptation for risky behavior has occurred, several explanations may account for this negative result.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Females prefer cooperative males even when cooperative behavior is unobserved: evidence from the mound-building mouse, Mus spicilegus

Theoretical and empirical studies in humans suggest that cooperative behaviors may act as signals during mate choice. However, cooperation is not always observable by potential partners before mate choice. To address whether cooperative phenotypes are preferred based on cues different from cooperative behaviors per se, we designed an experimental paradigm using wild-born mound-building mice (Mus spicilegus), a species with biparental care. In this species, females cannot observe male cooperative behaviors: mate choice occurs in the spring, whereas mounds are cooperatively built in the fall. We first assessed the variation in mound building investment and identified males exhibiting high and low amounts of cooperation. Second, we presented these males to females during two-way choice tests. As offspring survival relies on mound protection, we hypothesized that mound building could be a form of paternal care and assessed whether cooperative males were more involved in offspring attendance using pup-retrieval experiments. Our results indicate that females were more attracted to highly cooperative males over less cooperative, even when they did not observe them build. This finding suggests that female mate choice is influenced either by cues of cooperativeness different than cooperative behaviors or by preferences for traits associated with cooperativeness. Moreover, male offspring attendance was negatively correlated with cooperativeness, suggesting the potential existence of two alternative paternal strategies in offspring care (mound building versus offspring attendance). Overall, our findings support the existence of preference for cooperative phenotypes in a non-human species and suggest that sexual selection might be involved in the evolution of cooperation.

animal behavior and cognition↗