Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Farquhar, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Farquhar, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Exploiting Electrophysiological Measures of Semantic Processing for Auditory Attention Decoding

In Auditory Attention Decoding, a users electrophysiological brain responses to certain features of speech are modelled and subsequently used to distinguish attended from unattended speech in multi-speaker contexts. Such approaches are frequently based on acoustic features of speech, such as the auditory envelope. A recent paper shows that the brains response to a semantic description (i.e., semantic dissimilarity) of narrative speech can also be modelled using such an approach. Here we use the (publicly available) data accompanying that study, in order to investigate whether combining this semantic dissimilarity feature with an auditory envelope approach improves decoding performance over using the envelope alone. We analyse data from their Cocktail Party experiment in which 33 subjects attended to one of two simultaneously presented audiobook narrations, for 30 1-minute fragments. We find that the addition of the dissimilarity feature to an envelope-based approach significantly increases accuracy, though the increase is marginal (85.4% to 86.6%). However, we subsequently show that this dissimilarity feature, in which the degree of dissimilarity of the current word with regard to the previous context is tagged to the onsets of each content word, can be replaced with a binary content-word-onset feature, without significantly affecting the results (i.e., modelled responses or accuracy), putting in question the added value of the dissimilarity information for the approach introduced in this recent paper.

neuroscience↗

Semantic Probing: Feasibility of using sequential probes to decode what is on a user’s mind

In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using multiple sequential probe words to decode their relatedness to an active semantic concept on a users mind from the respective electrophysiological brain responses. If feasible, this relatedness information could be used by a Brain Computer Interface to infer that semantic concept, by integrating the knowledge of the relationship between the multiple probe words and the unknown target. Such a BCI can take advantage of the N400: an event related potential that is sensitive to semantic content of a stimulus in relation to an established semantic context. However, it is unknown whether the N400 is suited for the multiple probing paradigm we propose, as other intervening words might distract from the established context (i.e., the target word). We perform an experiment in which we present up to ten words after an initial target word, and find no attenuation of the strength of the N400 in grand average ERPs and no decrease in classification accuracy for probes occurring later in the sequences. These results lay the groundwork for the development of a BCI that infers the concept on a users mind through repeated probing.

neuroscience↗

Monitoring of language selection errors in switching: Not all about conflict

Although bilingual speakers are very good at selectively using one language rather than another, sometimes language selection errors occur. To investigate how bilinguals monitor their speech errors and control their languages in use, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in unbalanced Dutch-English bilingual speakers in a cued language-switching task. We tested the conflict-based monitoring model by investigating the error-related negativity (ERN) and comparing the effects of the two switching directions (i.e., to the first language, L1 vs. to the second language, L2). Results show that the speakers made more language selection errors when switching from their L2 to the L1 than vice versa. In the EEG, we observed a robust ERN effect following language selection errors compared to correct responses, reflecting monitoring of speech errors. Most interestingly, the ERN effect was enlarged when the speakers were switching to their L2 (less conflict) compared to switching to the L1 (more conflict). Our findings do not support the conflict-based monitoring model. We discuss an alternative account in terms of error prediction and reinforcement learning.

neuroscience↗