Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fagan, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Fagan, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Multispecies, Modality-Agnostic Scalable In Vivo Mosaic Screening Platform for Therapeutic Target Discovery

Validating therapeutic targets for complex diseases requires investigating gene functions within native tissue architectures rather than reductionist in vitro models. Here we present a modality-agnostic AAV-based in vivo high-throughput screening platform capable of delivering knockouts, gain-of-function, and synthetic miRNA knockdowns directly to cells within the diseased environment. This system scales to hundreds of perturbations and is adaptable to diverse species and organ systems. To translate high-dimensional screen data into therapeutic assessment, we established a curated analysis framework that scores single-cell transcriptomes against human disease-specific molecular signatures. This method enables quantitative ranking of targets across distinct biological domains ranging from structural fibrosis to inflammatory signaling, to narrow in on the therapeutic potential of each intervention. We applied this strategy to screen loss- and gain-of-function libraries in a murine pulmonary fibrosis model and within the spontaneously osteoarthritic joints of aged horses, identifying metabolic, antifibrotic, and immunomodulatory targets. Importantly, our analysis framework successfully predicted functional outcomes in orthogonal human ex vivo tissue models, including soluble collagen reduction in lung slices and glycosaminoglycan restoration in cartilage, thus establishing a powerful paradigm for prioritizing therapeutic targets by uniting human disease signatures with highly multiplexed in vivo functional genomics.

systems biology↗

Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists' use and perception of preprints

This qualitative study explores how and why journalists use preprints -- unreviewed research papers -- in their reporting. Through thematic analysis of interviews conducted with 19 health and science journalists in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, it applies a theoretical framework that conceptualizes COVID-19 preprint research as a form of post-normal science, characterized by high scientific uncertainty and societal relevance, urgent need for political decision-making, and value-related policy considerations. Findings suggest that journalists approach the decision to cover preprints as a careful calculation, in which the potential public benefits and the ease of access preprints provided were weighed against risks of spreading misinformation. Journalists described viewing unreviewed studies with extra skepticism and relied on diverse strategies to find, vet, and report on them. Some of these strategies represent standard science journalism, while others, such as labeling unreviewed studies as preprints, mark a departure from the norm. However, journalists also reported barriers to covering preprints, as many felt they lacked the expertise or the time required to fully understand or vet the research. The findings suggest that coverage of preprints is likely to continue post-pandemic, with important implications for scientists, journalists, and the publics who read their work.

scientific communication and education↗