Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

FOURCASSIE, V.

Publications and source records attributed to FOURCASSIE, V..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Differential thermal sensitivity may explain the temporal distribution of foraging activity among different-sized workers in a polymorphic ant species

One of the most stressful factors for insects is increasing temperature because of the risk of potentially fatal dehydration linked to their small size. We used respirometry to study the effect of both temperature and body mass on water loss and metabolic rate in individual workers of the polymorphic ant species Messor barbarus. As expected, we found that large ants exposed to increasing temperatures have a lower rate of water loss than small ants and that their mass-specific metabolic rate increases more slowly. However, counterintuitively, the measure of worker sensitivity to changes in temperature, as assessed by the instantaneous Q10 value (i.e., the rate of change across 10{degrees}C temperature intervals), shows that large ants are more sensitive than small ants to changes in temperature in terms of both water loss and metabolic rate. Such differential thermal sensitivity allows to make testable predictions on the temporal distribution of foraging activity among workers of different sizes in polymorphic ant species, as well as how these species may alter their colony demographics in response to rising temperatures.

physiology↗

Clearing the way to the external world: do ants make optimal decisions when removing obstacles from their subterranean galleries?

Transport tasks are simple tasks whose cost can be easily measured and that are thus well suited to test optimality hypotheses. Here we focus on a particular type of transport that occur when ants are clearing obstacles from their subterranean galleries. In the laboratory we studied how they extract an object from a gallery of various inclinations. We expected that if ants behave optimally, they should remove the object by the gallery extremity requiring the lower energetic effort. At the colony-level, we found that the obstacle was more often extracted by the lower end of the tube, even if this required a higher amount of mechanical work. At the individual level however, ants showed mechanically optimal pulling behaviours in 75% of cases. Our results suggest that individual ants take into account both the inclination of the gallery and the position of the obstacle in it to decide in which direction they pull. In addition, they seem to base their decision to release the obstacle on the relative effort they perceive while pulling. Using a simple simulation model, we argue that the suboptimal extraction bias observed at the colony-level can be explained by the sequential nature of the extraction task.

animal behavior and cognition↗