Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Esteve-Altava, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Esteve-Altava, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evolutionary parallelisms of pectoral and pelvic network-anatomy from fins to limbs

Pectoral and pelvic lobe-fins transformed into fore- and hindlimbs during the Devonian period, enabling the water-to-land transition in tetrapods. In the timespan of ~60 million years, transitional forms evolved, spanning a wide range of morphologies. Here we traced the evolution of well-articulated appendicular skeletons across the fins-to-limbs transition, using a network-based approach and phylogenetic tools to quantify and compare topological features of skeletal anatomy of fins and limbs. We show that the topological arrangement of bones in the pectoral and pelvic appendages evolved in parallel during the fins-to-limbs transition, occupying overlapping regions of the morphospace, following a directional mode of evolution, and decreasing their disparity over time. We identify the presence of digits as the morphological novelty triggering significant topological changes that clearly discriminated limbs from fins. The origin of digits caused an evolutionary shift towards appendages that were less densely and heterogeneously connected, but more assortative and modular. Topological disparity likewise decreased for both appendages: for the pectoral appendage, until the origin of amniotes; for the pelvic appendage, until a time concomitant with the earliest-known tetrapod tracks. Finally, we tested and rejected the presence of a pectoral-pelvic similarity bottleneck for the network-anatomy of appendages at the origin of tetrapods. We interpret our findings in the context of a dynamic compromise between possibly different functional demands in pectoral and pelvic appendages during the water-to-land transition and a shared developmental program constraining the evolvability of limbs.

evolutionary biology

Challenges in identifying and interpreting organizational modules in morphology

Form is a rich concept that agglutinates information about the proportions and topological arrangement of body parts. Modularity is readily observable in both the variation of proportions (variational modules) and the organization of topology (organizational modules). The study of variational modularity and of organizational modularity faces similar challenges regarding the identification of meaningful modules and the validation of generative processes; however, most studies in morphology focus solely on variational modularity, while organizational modularity is much less understood. A possible cause for this bias is the successful development in the last twenty years of morphometrics, and specially geometric morphometrics, to study patters of variation. This contrasts with the lack of a similar mathematical framework to deal with patterns of organization. Recently, a new mathematical framework has been proposed to study the organization of anatomical parts using tools from Network Theory, so-called anatomical network analysis. This essay explores the potential use of this new framework - and the challenges it faces in identifying and validating biologically meaningful modules in morphological systems -, by providing an example of a complete analysis of modularity of the human skull and upper limb. Finally, we suggest further directions of research that may bridge the gap between variational and organizational modularity studies.

zoology