Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Engelhard, I. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Engelhard, I. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The rosy future paradox: Positive future thinking without task relevance enhances negative biases and anxiety for aversive events

Expectations have an important role in guiding behavior and the interpretation of novel information, but can contain negative biases such as is the case in anxiety disorders. Positive future thinking may provide an accessible way to attenuate these negatively biases. However, much is still unclear about the optimal form of such positive interventions, and it is unknown if the effects go beyond subjective experience. Here, we used a positive future thinking intervention to adapt the way a stressful event is experienced. Participants imagined either task-relevant (N = 21) or irrelevant (N = 21) positive future events before being subjected to the Trier Social Stress Task, or did not receive the intervention (N= 20). We recorded resting state EEG during the anticipation and recovery phases of the TSST to assess intervention and trait anxiety related differences in the level of frontal delta-beta coupling, which is considered a neurobiological substrate of emotion regulation. Results show that the intervention reduces event-related stress and anxiety, and increases social fixation behavior and task performance, but only if future thinking is task relevant. Paradoxically, task-irrelevant positive future thoughts enhance negative perceptual biases and stress reactivity. This increase in stress reactivity in the task-irrelevant group was corroborated by the elevated levels frontal delta-beta coupling during event anticipation, especially for those with high trait anxiety. This suggests an increased demand for emotion regulation following the task-irrelevant intervention, possibly due to the contextual incongruence between positive imagery and the stressor. Together, these results show that positive future thinking can mitigate the negative emotional, behavioral and neurobiological consequences of a stressful event, but that it should not be applied indiscriminately. Task-relevant positive future thinking can be an accessible way to boost efficacy of exposure therapy for pathological anxiety, and can help people deal with negative anticipation in daily life.

neuroscience↗

The effect of stress on memory for temporal context: an exploratory study

Stress and emotional arousal interfere with encoding of temporal context memory for episodic events. However, it remains unclear how stress affects more fine-grained temporal memory, such as episodic events sequences and event times. Here, 86 healthy participants (M age = 22.5; 46% women, 54% men) were subjected to either a stress condition (socially evaluated cold pressor test) or a control condition, directly after or at a delay of 30 minutes they were presented the temporal structure of four virtual days. In these virtual days, time was scaled and participants could use clock cues to construe the passage of time within a day. We examined whether acute stress would interfere with encoding of episodic event sequences and temporal memory. Our results show that when learning took place directly after a stressor, virtual time estimates were more strongly biased towards a generalized timeline but temporal memory overall was not differentially affected between the stress and control groups. Exploratory analyses suggest that memory accuracy improved in men and deteriorated in women as a function of subjective stress levels following acute stress. In conclusion, acute stress amplified memory generalization but we found no stress related differences in memory accuracy across levels of temporal granularity.

neuroscience↗