Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Engel, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Engel, P..

44 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Niche partitioning facilitates coexistence of closely related gut bacteria

Ecological processes underlying bacterial coexistence in the gut are not well understood. Here, we disentangled the effect of the host and the diet on the coexistence of four closely related Lactobacillus species colonizing the honey bee gut. We serially passaged the four species through gnotobiotic bees and in liquid cultures in the presence of either pollen (bee diet) or simple sugars. Although the four species engaged in negative interactions, they were able to stably coexist, both in vivo and in vitro. However, coexistence was only possible in the presence of pollen, and not in simple sugars, independent of the environment. Using metatranscriptomics and metabolomics, we found that the four species utilize different pollen-derived carbohydrate substrates indicating resource partitioning as the basis of coexistence. Our results show that despite longstanding host association, gut bacterial interactions can be recapitulated in vitro providing insights about bacterial coexistence when combined with in vivo experiments.

microbiology↗

Functional strain redundancy and persistent phage infection in Swiss hard cheese starter cultures

Undefined starter cultures are poorly characterized bacterial communities from environmental origin used in cheese making. They are phenotypically stable and have evolved through domestication by repeated propagation in closed and highly controlled environments over centuries. This makes them interesting for understanding eco-evolutionary dynamics governing microbial communities. While cheese starter cultures are known to be dominated by a few bacterial species, little is known about the composition, functional relevance, and temporal dynamics of strain-level diversity. Here, we applied shotgun metagenomics to an important Swiss cheese starter culture and analyzed historical and experimental samples reflecting 82 years of starter culture propagation. We found that the bacterial community is highly stable and dominated by only a few coexisting strains of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis. Genome sequencing, metabolomics analysis, and co-culturing experiments of 43 isolates show that these strains are functionally redundant, but differ tremendously in their phage resistance potential. Moreover, we identified two highly abundant Streptococcus phages that seem to stably coexist in the community without any negative impact on bacterial growth or strain persistence, and despite the presence of a large and diverse repertoire of matching CRISPR spacers. Our findings show that functionally equivalent strains can coexist in domesticated microbial communities and highlight an important role of bacteria-phage interactions that are different from kill-the-winner dynamics.

microbiology↗

A prevalent and culturable microbiota links ecological balance to clinical stability of the human lung after transplantation

There is accumulating evidence that the lower airway microbiota impacts lung health. However, the link between microbial community composition and lung homeostasis remains elusive. We combined amplicon sequencing and culturomics to characterize the viable bacterial community in 234 longitudinal bronchoalveolar lavage samples from 64 lung transplant recipients and established links to viral loads, host gene expression, lung function, and transplant health. We find that the lung microbiota post-transplant can be categorized into four distinct compositional states, pneumotypes. The predominant balanced pneumotype was characterized by a diverse bacterial community with moderate viral loads, and host gene expression profiles suggesting immune tolerance. The other three pneumotypes were characterized by being either microbiota-depleted, or dominated by potential pathogens, and were linked to increased immune activity, lower respiratory function, and increased risks of infection and rejection. Collectively, our findings establish a link between the lung microbial ecosytem, human lung function, and clinical stability post-transplant. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=191 SRC="FIGDIR/small/106211v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (57K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1df2be3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ba839dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@116f657org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@86d8ac_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

microbiology↗

Vast differences in strain-level diversity in the gut microbiota of two closely related honey bee species

Most bacterial species encompass strains with vastly different gene content. Strain diversity in microbial communities is therefore considered to be of functional importance. Yet, little is known about the extent to which related microbial communities differ in diversity at this level and which underlying mechanisms may constrain and maintain strain-level diversity. Here, we used shotgun metagenomics to characterize and compare the gut microbiota of two honey bee species, Apis mellifera and Apis cerana, which have diverged about 6 mio years ago. While both host species are colonized by largely overlapping bacterial 16S rRNA phylotypes, we find that their communities are highly host-specific when analyzed with genomic resolution. Despite their similar ecology, A. mellifera displayed a much higher extent of strain-level diversity and functional gene content in the microbiota than A. cerana, per colony and per individual bee. In particular, the gene repertoire for polysaccharide degradation was massively expanded in the microbiota of A. mellifera relative to A. cerana. Bee management practices, divergent ecological adaptation, or habitat size may have contributed to the observed differences in microbiota composition of these two key pollinator species. Our results illustrate that the gut microbiota of closely related animal hosts can differ vastly in genomic diversity despite sharing similar levels of diversity at the 16S rRNA gene. This is likely to have consequences for gut microbiota functioning and host-symbiont interactions, highlighting the need for metagenomic studies to understand the ecology and evolution of microbial communities.

microbiology↗

Acetobacteraceae in the honey bee gut comprise two distant clades with diverging metabolism and ecological niches

Various bacteria of the family Acetobacteraceae are associated with the gut environment of insects. Honey bees harbor two distinct Acetobacteraceae in their gut, Alpha2.1 and Alpha2.2. While Alpha2.1 seems to be a gut specialist, Alpha2.2 is also found in the diet (e.g. royal jelly), the hypopharyngeal glands, and the larvae of honey bees. Here, we combined amplicon and genome sequencing to better understand functional differences associated with the ecology of Alpha2.1 and Alpha2.2. We find that the two phylotypes are differentially distributed along the worker and queen bee gut. Phylogenetic analysis shows that Alpha2.2 is nested within the acetic acid bacteria and consists of two separate sub-lineages, whereas Alpha2.1 belongs to a basal lineage with an unusual GC content for Acetobacteraceae. Gene content analysis revealed major differences in the central carbon and respiratory metabolism between the two phylotypes. While Alpha2.2 encodes two periplasmic dehydrogenases to carry out oxidative fermentation, Alpha2.1 lacks this capability, but instead harbors a diverse set of cytoplasmic dehydrogenases. These differences are accompanied by the loss of the TCA cycle in Alpha2.2, but not in Alpha2.1. We speculate that Alpha2.2 has specialized for fast-resource utilization through incomplete carbohydrate oxidation, giving it an advantage in sugar-rich environments such as royal jelly. On the contrary, the broader metabolic range of Alpha2.1 may provide an advantage in the worker bee hindgut, where competition with other bacteria and flexibility in resource utilization may be relevant for persistence. Our results show that bacteria belonging to the same family may utilize vastly different strategies to colonize niches associated with the animal gut.

genomics↗

Gut microbiota structure differs between honey bees in winter and summer

Adult honey bees harbor a specialized gut microbiota of relatively low complexity. While seasonal differences in community composition have been reported, previous studies have focused on compositional changes rather than differences in absolute bacterial loads. Moreover, little is known about the gut microbiota of winter bees, which live much longer than bees during the foraging season, and which are critical for colony survival. We quantified seven core members of the bee gut microbiota in a single colony over two years and characterized the community composition in 14 colonies during summer and winter. Our data shows that total bacterial loads substantially differ between foragers, nurses, and winter bees. Long-lived winter bees had the highest bacterial loads and the lowest community -diversity, with a characteristic shift towards high levels of Bartonella and Commensalibacter, and a reduction of opportunistic colonizers. Using gnotobiotic bee experiments, we show that diet is a major contributor to the observed differences in bacterial loads. Overall, our study reveals that the gut microbiota of winter bees is remarkably different from foragers and nurses. Considering the importance of winter bees for colony survival, future work should focus on the role of the gut microbiota in winter bee health and disease.

microbiology↗

Genomic changes underlying host specialization in the bee gut symbiont Lactobacillus Firm5

Bacteria that engage in longstanding associations with particular hosts are expected to evolve host-specific adaptations that limit their capacity to thrive in other environments. Consistent with this, many gut symbionts seem to have a limited host range, based on community profiling and phylogenomics. However, few studies have experimentally investigated host specialization of gut symbionts and underlying mechanisms have largely remained elusive. Here, we studied host specialization of a dominant gut symbiont of social bees, Lactobacillus Firm5. We show that Firm5 strains isolated from honey bees and bumble bees separate into deep-branching phylogenetic lineages. Despite their divergent evolution, colonization experiments show that bumble bee strains are capable of colonizing the honey bee gut. However, they were less successful than honey bee strains, and competition with honey bee strains completely abolished their colonization, whereas honey bee strains were able to coexist. This suggests that both host selection and interbacterial competition play important roles for host specialization. Using comparative genomics of 27 Firm5 isolates, we identified candidate genomic changes underlying host specialization. We found that honey bee strains harbored a larger and more diverse gene pool of carbohydrate-related functions than bumble bee strains. As dietary-derived carbohydrates are the main energy source for strains of the Firm5 phylotype, the metabolic flexibility of honey bee strains may give these bacteria a competitive advantage over bumble bee strains in colonizing the gut niche and hence contribute to host specialization.

microbiology↗

Disentangling metabolic functions of bacteria in the honey bee gut

It is presently unclear how much individual community members contribute to the overall metabolic output of a gut microbiota. To address this question, we used the honey bee, which harbors a relatively simple and remarkably conserved gut microbiota with striking parallels to the mammalian system and importance for bee health. Using untargeted metabolomics, we profiled metabolic changes in gnotobiotic bees that were colonized with the complete microbiota reconstituted from cultured strains. We then determined the contribution of individual community members in mono-colonized bees, and recapitulated our findings using in vitro cultures. Our results show that the honey bee gut microbiota utilizes a wide range of pollen-derived substrates including flavonoids and outer pollen wall components, suggesting a key role for degradation of recalcitrant secondary plant metabolites and pollen digestion. In turn, multiple species were responsible for the accumulation of organic acids and polyphenol degradation products, and a specific gut symbiont, Bifidobacterium asteroides, stimulated the production of host hormones known to impact bee development. While we found evidence for cross-feeding interactions, [~]80% of the identified metabolic changes were also observed in mono-colonized bees with Lactobacilli being responsible for the largest share of the metabolic output. These results suggest that bacteria in the honey bee gut colonize largely independent metabolic niches, which may be a general characteristic of gut microbiomes. Our study reveals diverse metabolic functions of gut bacteria that are likely to contribute to bee health, and provide fundamental insights into how metabolic functions are partitioned within gut communities.\n\nAuthor summaryHoney bees are important pollinators that harbor a simple gut microbiota with striking parallels to the mammalian system. This makes them relevant models to study gut microbiota functions and its impact on host health. We applied untargeted metabolomics to characterize metabolic changes induced by the gut microbiota, and to characterize contributions of the major community members. We find that the gut microbiota digests recalcitrant substrates derived from the bees pollen-diet. Most metabolic changes could be explained by the activity of individual community members suggesting substrate specificity and independent metabolic niches. Our study provides novel insights into the functional understanding of the bee gut microbiota and provides a framework for applying untargeted metabolomics to disentangle metabolic functions of gut bacteria.

microbiology↗