Biology subjects

Elmas, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Elmas, A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Master regulators governing protein abundance across ten human cancer types

Protein abundance correlates only moderately with mRNA levels, and are modulated post-transcriptionally by a network of regulators including ribosomes, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and the proteasome. Here, we identified Master Protein abundance Regulators (MaPRs) across ten cancer types by devising a new computational pipeline that jointly analyzed transcriptomes and proteomes from 1,305 tumor samples. We identified 232 to 1,394 MaPRs per cancer type, mediating up to 79% of post- transcriptional regulatory networks. MaPRs exhibit high network connectivity, strong genetic dependency in cancer cells, and significant enrichment for RBPs. Combining tumor up-regulation, druggability, and target network analyses identified cancer-specific vulnerabilities. MaPRs predict tumor proteomic subtypes more accurately than other proteins. Finally, significant portions of RBP MaPR-target relationships were validated by experimental evidence from eCLIP binding and knockdown assays. Our findings uncover central MaPRs that govern post-transcriptional networks, highlighting diverse processes underlying human proteome regulation and identifying key regulators in cancer biology.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Expression-Driven Genetic Dependency Reveals Targets for Precision Medicine

Cancer cells are heterogeneous, each harboring distinct molecular aberrations and are dependent on different genes for their survival and proliferation. While successful targeted therapies have been developed based on driver DNA mutations, many patient tumors lack druggable mutations and have limited treatment options. Here, we hypothesize that new precision oncology targets may be identified through "expression-driven dependency", whereby cancer cells with high expression of a targeted gene are more vulnerable to the knockout of that gene. We introduce a Bayesian approach, BEACON, to identify such targets by jointly analyzing global transcriptomic and proteomic profiles with genetic dependency data of cancer cell lines across 17 tissue lineages. BEACON identifies known druggable genes, e.g., BCL2, ERBB2, EGFR, ESR1, MYC, while revealing new targets confirmed by both mRNA- and protein-expression driven dependency. Notably, the identified genes show an overall 3.8-fold enrichment for approved drug targets and enrich for druggable oncology targets by 7 to 10-fold. We experimentally validate that the depletion of GRHL2, TP63, and PAX5 effectively reduce tumor cell growth and survival in their dependent cells. Overall, we present the catalog of express-driven dependency targets as a resource for identifying novel therapeutic targets in precision oncology.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

Mutation Impact on mRNA Versus Protein Expression across Human Cancers

Cancer mutations are often assumed to alter proteins, thus promoting tumorigenesis. However, how mutations affect protein expression has rarely been systematically investigated. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of mutation impacts on mRNA- and protein-level expressions of 953 cancer cases with paired genomics and global proteomic profiling across six cancer types. Protein-level impacts are validated for 47.2% of the somatic expression quantitative trait loci (seQTLs), including mutations from likely "long-tail" driver genes. Devising a statistical pipeline for identifying somatic protein-specific QTLs (spsQTLs), we reveal several gene mutations, including NF1 and MAP2K4 truncations and TP53 missenses showing disproportional influence on protein abundance not readily explained by transcriptomics. Cross-validating with data from massively parallel assays of variant effects (MAVE), TP53 missenses associated with high tumor TP53 proteins were experimentally confirmed as functional. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering protein-level expression to validate mutation impacts and identify functional genes and mutations.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

Structural Analysis of Genomic and Proteomic Signatures Reveal Dynamic Expression of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Breast Cancer and Tissue

Structural features of proteins capture underlying information about protein evolution and function, which enhances the analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data. Here we develop Structural Analysis of Gene and protein Expression Signatures (SAGES), a method that describes expression data using features calculated from sequence-based prediction methods and 3D structural models. We used SAGES, along with machine learning, to characterize tissues from healthy individuals and those with breast cancer. We analyzed gene expression data from 23 breast cancer patients and genetic mutation data from the COSMIC database as well as 17 breast tumor protein expression profiles. We identified prominent expression of intrinsically disordered regions in breast cancer proteins as well as relationships between drug perturbation signatures and breast cancer disease signatures. Our results suggest that SAGES is generally applicable to describe diverse biological phenomena including disease states and drug effects.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2021

Spatially Interacting Phosphorylation Sites and Mutations in Cancer

Advances in mass-spectrometry have generated increasingly large-scale proteomics datasets containing tens of thousands of phosphorylation sites (phosphosites) that require prioritization. We develop a bioinformatics tool called HotPho and systematically discover 3D co-clustering of phosphosites and cancer mutations on protein structures. HotPho identifies 474 such hybrid clusters containing 1,255 co-clustering phosphosites, including RET p.S904/Y928, the conserved HRAS/KRAS p.Y96, and IDH1 p.Y139/IDH2 p.Y179 that are adjacent to recurrent mutations on protein structures not found by linear proximity approaches. Hybrid clusters, enriched in histone and kinase domains, frequently include expression-associated mutations experimentally shown as activating and conferring genetic dependency. Approximately 300 co-clustering phosphosites are verified in patient samples of 5 cancer types or previously implicated in cancer, including CTNNB1 p.S29/Y30, EGFR p.S720, MAPK1 p.S142, and PTPN12 p.S275. In summary, systematic 3D clustering analysis highlights nearly 3,000 likely functional mutations and over 1,000 cancer phosphosites for downstream investigation and evaluation of potential clinical relevance.

bioinformatics↗