Eisenbrandt, M. R. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

To jump or not to jump: Comparing effects of phenotypic plasticity on the visual responses and escape behavior of locusts and grasshoppers

Locusts exhibit remarkable phenotypic plasticity changing their appearance and behavior from solitary grasshoppers to gregarious locusts when population density increases. These changes include morphological differences in the size and shape of brain regions, but little is known about plasticity within individual neurons and alterations in behavior not directly related to aggregation or swarming. We examined looming escape behavior and the properties of a well-studied collision-detection neuron in gregarious and solitarious animals of three closely related species, the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria), the Central American locust (S. piceifrons) and the American bird grasshopper (S. americana). For this neuron, the lobula giant movement detector (LGMD), we examined dendritic morphology, membrane properties, gene expression, and looming responses. Gregarious animals reliably jumped in response to looming stimuli, but surprisingly solitarious desert locusts did not produce escape jumps. These solitarious animals also had smaller LGMD dendrites. This is the first study done on three different species of grasshoppers to observe the effects of phenotypic plasticity on the jump escape behavior, physiology and transcriptomics of these animals. Surprisingly, there were little differences in these properties between the two phases except for behavior. For all the three species, gregarious animals jumped more than solitarious animals, but no significant differences were found between the two phases of animals in the electrophysiological and transcriptomics studies. Our results suggest that phase change impacts mainly the motor system and that the physiological properties of motor neurons need to be characterized to understand fully the variation in jump escape behavior across phases. New & Noteworthy (74 words): Swarming is observed in some grasshopper species, called locusts. We compared jump escape behavior between gregarious and solitarious grasshoppers and locusts, as well as LGMD responses to looming stimuli, and analyzed the morphological differences in this neuron. This study provides insights into the effects of phase change on the visual system of locusts and grasshoppers as it relates to looming-evoked jump escape behavior. In this context, our results suggest that phenotypic plasticity mainly impacts the motor system.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Convergent escape behavior from distinct visual processing of impending collision in fish and grasshoppers

In animal species ranging from invertebrate to mammals, visually guided escape behaviors have been studied using looming stimuli, the two-dimensional expanding projection on a screen of an object approaching on a collision course at constant speed. The peak firing rate or membrane potential of neurons responding to looming stimuli often tracks a fixed threshold angular size of the approaching stimulus that contributes to the triggering of escape behaviors. To study whether this result holds more generally, we designed stimuli that simulate acceleration or deceleration over the course of object approach on a collision course. Under these conditions, we found that collision detecting neurons in grasshoppers were sensitive to acceleration whereas the triggering of escape behaviors was less so. In contrast, neurons in goldfish identified indirectly through the characteristic features of the escape behaviors they trigger, showed little sensitivity to acceleration. This closely mirrored a broader lack of sensitivity to acceleration of the goldfish escape behavior. Thus, although the sensory coding of simulated colliding stimuli with non-zero acceleration likely differs in grasshoppers and goldfish, the triggering of escape behaviors converges towards similar characteristics. Approaching stimuli with non-zero acceleration may help refine our understanding of neural computations underlying escape behaviors in a broad range of animal species. Key pointsO_LIA companion manuscript showed that two mathematical models of collision-detecting neurons in grasshoppers and goldfish make distinct predictions for their responses to simulated objects approaching on a collision course with non-zero acceleration. C_LIO_LITesting these experimental predictions showed that grasshopper neurons are sensitive to acceleration while goldfish neurons are not, in agreement with the distinct models proposed previously in these species using constant velocity approaches. C_LIO_LIBoth the escape behaviors of grasshopper and goldfish were insensitive to acceleration suggesting a further transformation downstream in grasshopper motor circuits that matches the computation observed in the goldfish Mauthner cell. C_LIO_LIThus, in spite of different sensory processing in the two species, escape behaviors converge towards similar solutions. C_LIO_LIThe use of object acceleration during approach on a collision course may help better understand the neural computations implemented for collision avoidance in a broad range of species. C_LI

neuroscience↗