Biology subjects

Ehrlich, K. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Ehrlich, K. C..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Promoter-adjacent DNA hypermethylation can downmodulate gene expression: TBX15 in the muscle lineage

TBX15, which encodes a differentiation-related transcription factor, displays promoter-adjacent DNA hypermethylation in myoblasts and skeletal muscle (psoas) that is absent from non-expressing cells in other lineages. By whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq), these hypermethylated regions were found to border both sides of a constitutively unmethylated promoter. To understand the functionality of this DNA hypermethylation, we cloned the differentially methylated sequences (DMRs) in CpG-free reporter vectors and tested them for promoter or enhancer activity upon transient transfection. These cloned regions exhibited strong promoter activity and, when placed upstream of a weak promoter, strong enhancer activity specifically in myoblast host cells. In vitro CpG methylation targeted to the DMR sequences in the plasmids resulted in 86 - 100% loss of promoter or enhancer activity, depending on the insert sequence. These results as well as chromatin epigenetic and transcription profiles for this gene in various cell types support the hypothesis that DNA hypermethylation immediately upstream and downstream of the unmethylated promoter region suppresses enhancer/extended promoter activity, thereby downmodulating, but not silencing, expression in myoblasts and certain kinds of skeletal muscle. This promoter-border hypermethylation is not found in cell types with a silent TBX15 gene probably because they have no transcription to modulate. TBX18, TBX2, TBX3 and TBX1 display TBX15-like hypermethylated DMRs at their promoter borders and preferential expression in myoblasts. Therefore, promoter-adjacent DNA hypermethylation for downmodulating transcription to prevent overexpression may be used more frequently for transcription regulation than currently appreciated.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Epigenomic and transcriptomic prioritization of candidate obesity-risk regulatory GWAS SNPs

Concern about rising rates of obesity has prompted searches for its genetic risk determinants in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Most genetic variants that contribute to the increased risk of a given trait are probably regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However, identifying plausible regulatory SNPs is difficult because of their varied locations relative to their target gene and linkage disequilibrium, which makes most GWAS-derived SNPs only proxies for many fewer functional SNPs. We developed a systematic approach to prioritizing GWAS-derived obesity SNPs using detailed epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis in adipose tissue vs. heterologous tissues. From 50 obesity-related GWAS and 121,064 expanded SNPs, we prioritized 47 potential causal regulatory SNPs (Tier-1 SNPs) for 14 gene loci. A detailed examination of seven of these genes revealed that four (CABLES1, PC, PEMT, and FAM13A) had Tier-1 SNPs that might regulate alternative use of transcription start sites resulting in different polypeptides being generated or different amounts of an intronic microRNA gene being expressed. HOXA11 and long noncoding RNA gene RP11-392O17.1 had Tier-1 SNPs in their 3 or promoter region, respectively, and strong preferences for expression in subcutaneous vs. visceral adipose tissue. ZBED3-AS1 had two intragenic Tier-1 SNPs, each of which might contribute to mediating obesity risk through modulating long-distance chromatin interactions. We conclude that prioritization of regulatory SNP candidates should focus on their surrounding epigenetic features in a trait-relevant tissue. Our approach not only revealed especially credible novel regulatory SNPs, but also helped evaluate previously highlighted obesity GWAS SNPs that were candidates for transcription regulation.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Epigenetics of skeletal muscle-associated genes in the ASB, LRRC, TMEM, and OSBPL gene families

Much remains to be discovered about the intersection of tissue-specific transcription control and the epigenetics of skeletal muscle (SkM), a very complex and dynamic organ. From four gene families, ASB, LRRC, TMEM, and OSBPL, we chose 21 genes that are preferentially expressed in human SkM relative to 52 other tissue types and analyzed relationships between their tissue-specific epigenetics and expression. We also compared their genetics, proteomics, and descriptions in the literature. For this study, we identified genes with little or no previous descriptions of SkM functionality (ASB4, ASB8, ASB10, ASB12, ASB16, LRRC14B, LRRC20, LRRC30, TMEM52, TMEM233, OSBPL6/ORP6, and OSBPL11/ORP11) and included genes whose SkM functions had been previously addressed (ASB2, ASB5, ASB11, ASB15, LRRC2, LRRC38, LRRC39, TMEM38A/TRIC-A, and TMEM38B/TRIC-B). Among the transcription-related SkM epigenetic features that we identified were super-enhancers, promoter DNA hypomethylation, lengthening of constitutive low-methylated promoter regions, and SkM-related enhancers for one gene embedded in a neighboring gene (e.g., ASB8-PFKM, LRRC39-DBT, and LRRC14B-PLEKHG4B gene-pairs). In addition, highly or lowly co-expressed long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes probably regulate several of these genes. Our findings give insights into tissue-specific epigenetic patterns and functionality of related genes in a gene family and can elucidate normal and disease-related regulation of gene expression in SkM.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Osteoporosis- and obesity-risk interrelationships: An epigenetic analysis of GWAS-derived SNPs at the developmental gene TBX15

A major challenge in translating findings from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to biological mechanisms is pinpointing functional variants because only a very small percentage of variants associated with a given trait actually impact the trait. We used an extensive epigenetics, transcriptomics, and genetics analysis of the TBX15/WARS2 neighborhood to prioritize this regions best-candidate causal variants for the genetic risk of osteoporosis (estimated bone density, eBMD) and obesity (waist-hip ratio or waist circumference adjusted for body mass index). TBX15 encodes a transcription factor that is important in bone development and adipose biology. Manual curation of 692 GWAS-derived variants gave eight strong candidates for causal SNPs that modulate TBX15 transcription in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) or osteoblasts, which highly and specifically express this gene. None of these SNPs were prioritized by Bayesian fine-mapping. The eight regulatory causal SNPs were in enhancer or promoter chromatin seen preferentially in SAT or osteoblasts at TBX15 intron-1 or upstream. They overlap strongly predicted, allele-specific transcription factor binding sites. Our analysis suggests that these SNPs act independently of two missense SNPs in TBX15. Remarkably, five of the regulatory SNPs were associated with eBMD and obesity and had the same trait-increasing allele for both. We found that WARS2 obesity-related SNPs can be ascribed to high linkage disequilibrium with TBX15 intron-1 SNPs. Our findings from GWAS index, proxy, and imputed SNPs suggest that a few SNPs, including three in a 0.7-kb cluster, act as causal regulatory variants to fine-tune TBX15 expression and, thereby, affect both obesity and osteoporosis risk.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Hypermethylation of human DNA: Fine-tuning transcription associated with development

Tissue-specific gene transcription can be affected by DNA methylation in ways that are difficult to discern from studies focused on genome-wide analyses of differentially methylated regions (DMRs). We studied 95 genes in detail using available epigenetic and transcription databases to detect and elucidate less obvious associations between development-linked hypermethylated DMRs in myoblasts (Mb) and cell-and tissue-specific expression. Many of these genes encode developmental transcription factors and display DNA hypermethylation also in skeletal muscle (SkM) and a few heterologous samples (e.g., aorta, mammary epithelial cells, or brain) among the 38 types of human cell cultures or tissues examined. Most of the DMRs overlapped transcription regulatory elements, including canonical, alternative, or cryptic promoters; enhancers; CTCF binding sites; and long-noncoding RNA (lncRNA) gene regions. Among the prominent relationships between DMRs and expression was promoter-region hypermethylation accompanying repression in Mb but not in many other repressed samples (26 genes). Another surprising relationship was down-modulated (but not silenced) expression in Mb associated with DNA hypermethylation at cryptic enhancers in Mb although such methylation was absent in both non-expressing samples and highly expressing samples (24 genes). The tissue-specificity of DNA hypermethylation can be explained for many of the genes by their roles in prenatal development or by the tissue-specific expression of neighboring genes. Besides elucidating developmental epigenetics, our study provides insights into the roles of abnormal DNA methylation in disease, e.g., cancer, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and congenital heart malformations.

genomics↗