Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ehbrecht, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Ehbrecht, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Forest biodiversity benefits from warmer microclimate, but only in colder regions

The diversity of many forest-dwelling organisms depends on forest structure, but it remains unknown to which degree this is mediated by microclimatic temperature, and whether microclimatic buffering is universally beneficial for forest biodiversity. In 234 broad-leaved forest plots across nine climatically differing regions in Germany, we measured micro- and macroclimatic temperatures, canopy cover, and deadwood volume after experimental manipulations of forest structure through thinning operations and gap cuts. We surveyed 21 taxonomic groups, representing plants, bacteria, fungi, and animals, to assess how their diversity depended on the predictors. Multi-taxon diversity, and diversity of ten separate taxonomic groups, increased from closed to open canopies. Only necrophagous beetles were more diverse in closed stands. These effects of canopy cover on diversity were partly mediated by microclimatic temperatures. Thereby, diversity responses to microclimatic temperature depended on the macroclimatic context. In regions with colder summers, locally warmer microclimates in canopy gaps had strong positive effects on biodiversity, while these effects were not found in regions with warmer summers. Consequently, management strategies aimed at multi-taxon forest diversity conservation should be chosen based on the regional climate, favoring canopy gaps primarily in colder regions, and taking future climate warming into consideration.

ecology↗

Microclimatic heterogeneity is associated with forest structural complexity and biodiversity

Forest microclimates, their dependence on forest structure, and their impact on biodiversity are crucial for future forest management under climate change. However, standard approaches for measuring forest microclimates do not capture within-plot heterogeneity, which, according to the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis, is a key driver of local biodiversity. We quantified horizontal and vertical microclimatic heterogeneity within 30 broad-leaved forest plots in Central Europe using a three-dimensional design with high spatial resolution. Moreover, we examined whether microclimatic heterogeneity differs among silvicultural treatments and whether it can be predicted using forest structure indices derived from laser scanning. Additionally, we explored the relationship between microclimatic heterogeneity and biodiversity. In the understory of canopy gaps, warm and cold habitats co-existed in close proximity, leading to a high horizontal microclimatic heterogeneity. In closed stands with high structural complexity, we found steep gradients of increasing temperature and vapor pressure deficit from the ground to the canopy during mid-day. Canopy cover and forest structural complexity were strong indicators of microclimatic heterogeneity. We found positive relationships between herb layer temperature heterogeneity and the diversity of plants, Hymenoptera, and Diptera. Our results demonstrate that single-point measurements fail to capture the substantial microclimatic heterogeneity within plots, potentially misrepresenting the conditions experienced by forest species. However, laser scanning provides reliable indicators for within- plot microclimatic heterogeneity. With canopy gaps featuring high horizontal microclimatic heterogeneity and promoting the biodiversity of several taxonomic groups, we argue that managing forests for maximized temperature buffering should not be the only strategy to conserve forest biodiversity. HighlightsO_LIHigh small-scale horizontal microclimatic heterogeneity in canopy gaps C_LIO_LISteep vertical microclimatic gradients in closed-canopy forests C_LIO_LICanopy cover and structural complexity: indicators for microclimatic heterogeneity C_LIO_LIPositive relationship between herb layer temperature heterogeneity and biodiversity C_LI

ecology↗