Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Edwards, P. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Edwards, P. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hippocampal epigenetic changes associated with population cycle phase in wild voles

Vole and lemming population cycles are an enigma in ecology. Decades of field observations and experimental manipulations have revealed that cycles cannot always be explained by extrinsic factors in the environment, including food availability or predator numbers. Thus, it has been proposed that intrinsic mechanisms, such as adaptive alterations in phenotype during different phases of the cycle, drive population dynamics. However, the mechanisms underlying such phenotypic changes have not been elucidated. We test the hypothesis that epigenetic changes occur over population cycles by comparing whole epigenome DNA methylation changes in brain tissue collected from northern red-backed voles (Clethrionomys rutilus) in a wild, naturally cycling population during the peak, decline, and low years. Overall, the greatest number of differentially methylated CG sites (DMCs) and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were detected in comparisons between voles from the peak phase and low phase of the cycle. We highlight methylation differences in the promoter region of ATP synthase subunit c (Atp5g3) and an intron of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (Igf1R), which may be associated with growth, development, and bioenergetics. There were additional changes in the promoters of members of the cytochrome P450 enzyme family, including Cyp1a1, associated with estrogen metabolism, as well as the promoter of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (Mif), and in an exon of serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase (Sgk1), which may link changes in stressors to direct brain changes. Our study is the first interrogation into broad epigenetic changes associated with natural population cycle phase in a wild mammal.

ecology↗

Hormones do not make the mole-rat: no steroid hormone signatures of subordinate behavioral phenotypes

In some cooperatively breeding groups, individuals have distinct behavioral characteristics that are often stable and predictable across time. However, in others, like the eusocial naked mole-rat, evidence for behavioral phenotypes is ambiguous. Here, we study whether the naked mole-rat can be divided into discrete phenotypes and if circulating hormone levels underpin these differences. Naked mole-rat colonies consist of a single breeding female and dozens to hundreds of non-reproductive subordinates. The subordinates can potentially be divided into soldiers, who defend the colony; workers, who maintain it; and dispersers, who want to leave it. We established six colonies de novo, tracked them over three years, and assessed the behavior and hormone levels of the subordinates. We found that soldiers tended to be from earlier litters and were higher ranked compared to workers, whereas dispersers were distributed throughout litters and rankings. There was no difference in estradiol, testosterone, or dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels amongst phenotypes. Progesterone levels were higher in soldiers but this difference appeared to be driven by a few individuals. Principal component analysis demonstrated that soldiers separated into a discrete category relative to workers/dispersers, with the highest ranked loadings being age, weight, and testosterone levels. However, the higher testosterone in soldiers was correlated with large body size instead of strictly behavioral phenotype. Workers and dispersers have more overlap with each other and no hormonal differences. Thus the behavioral variation in subordinate naked mole-rats is likely not driven by circulating steroid hormone levels but rather stems from alternative neural and/or neuroendocrine mechanisms.

animal behavior and cognition↗