Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Edelaar, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Edelaar, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tracking morphological development in stony corals

The shape of reef-building corals largely determines how they interact with their environment and the ecosystem services they provide. However, morphology is not fixed. As corals grow and develop from singular polyps to mature adult colonies, they experience pronounced changes in their morphology. This developmental trait variation remains poorly quantified in corals, despite their importance as ecosystem engineers. To address this gap, we used photogrammetry to track the morphological development of wild coral colonies across six size-independent metrics designed to capture variation in volume compactness, surface complexity, and top-heaviness. Size-trait models and analyses of colony movement through morphological trait space revealed that small colonies shared compact morphologies and only later diverged along growth-form-specific developmental trajectories. Massive corals largely retained stable shapes as they grew, whereas non-massive colonies became less compact, more top-heavy, and in most cases, more complex. Despite these differences, there was still overlap between growth forms in their developmental trajectories through morphospace. These findings highlight that traditional categorical growth forms mask important developmental variation, particularly early in coral ontogeny. By applying a quantitative trait-based framework, this study improves understanding of coral morphological development and provides a foundation for linking individual growth trajectories to broader reef ecosystem dynamics.

ecology↗

Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity

Over the last few years, matching habitat choice has gained attention as a mechanism for maintaining biodiversity and driving speciation. It revolves around the idea that individuals select the habitat in which they perceive to obtain greater fitness after a prior evaluation of their local performance across heterogeneous environments. This results in individuals with similar ecological traits converging to the same patches, and hence could indirectly cause assortative mating when mating occurs in those patches. White-eyed mutants of Drosophila fruit flies have a series of disadvantages compared to wild type flies, including a poorer performance under bright light. It has been previously reported that, when given a choice, wild type Drosophila simulans preferred a brightly lit habitat while white-eyed mutants occupied a dimly lit one. This spatial segregation allowed the eye color polymorphism to be maintained for several generations, whereas normally it is quickly replaced by the wild type. Here we compare the habitat choice decisions of white-eyed and wild type flies in another species, D. melanogaster. We released groups of flies in a light gradient and recorded their departure and settlement behavior. Departure depended on sex and phenotype, but not on the light conditions of the release point. Settlement depended on sex, and on the interaction between phenotype and light conditions of the point of settlement. Nonetheless, simulations showed that this differential habitat use by the phenotypes would only cause a minimal degree of assortative mating in this species.

evolutionary biology↗