Biology subjects

Ebner-Priemer, U.

Publications and source records attributed to Ebner-Priemer, U..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Neurostructural correlates of real-life social drinking risk in alcohol use disorder

The social context of alcohol consumption is increasingly recognized as an important factor in the development of alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, individuals with AUD may differ in how strongly alcohol use by people around them is associated with their own drinking, and the neurostructural basis of this variation remains unclear. Here we studied 83 individuals with AUD (53 men, 30 women; mean [SD] age, 37.20 [12.42] years; median DSM-5 AUD criteria, 4) using six weeks of ecological momentary assessment and structural magnetic resonance imaging (n = 80). Across 5,221 non-solitary observations, greater exposure to surrounding drinkers was associated with increased odds of momentary drinking (odds ratio, 4.23; 95% CI, 3.60-4.97), with significant between-person variation that we quantified as social drinking risk (SDR). Higher SDR was associated with lower gray matter volume in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (T = 5.40; P < .001) and weaker pregenual anterior cingulate cortex-ventral striatum structural covariance (T = 3.15; P = .032). These findings support SDR as an ecologically grounded phenotype linking daily-life social-context sensitivity to cingulostriatal structure, with potential relevance for mechanistic and interventional research in AUD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Real-time individual benefit from social interactions before and during the lockdown: The crucial role of personality, neurobiology and genes.

BackgroundSocial integration is a major resilience factor for staying healthy. However, the COVID-19-pandemic led to unprecedented restrictions in social life. The consequences of these social lockdowns on momentary well-being are yet not fully understood. MethodWe investigated the individual affective benefit from social interactions in a longitudinal birth cohort study. We used two real-time, real-life ecological momentary assessments once before and once during the initial lockdown of the pandemic (N~6800 total observations) to determine the protective role of social interactions on well-being. Moreover, we used a multimethod approach combining the ecological assessment data with individual risk and resilience factors to analyze the moderating mechanisms of personality, neurobiology and genes. ResultsSocial contacts were linked to higher positive affect both during normal times and during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the beneficial role of social embedding. Moreover, this relationship was moderated by amygdala volume, neuroticism and polygenic risk for schizophrenia. In detail, participants with a larger left amygdala volume and higher trait neuroticism exhibited an affective benefit from more social interactions prior to the pandemic. This pattern changed during the pandemic with participants with smaller amygdala volumes and lower neurotic traits showing a social affective gain during the pandemic. Moreover, participants with low genetic risk for schizophrenia showed an affective benefit from social interactions irrespective of the time point. ConclusionOur results highlight the protective role of social integration on momentary well-being. Thereby, we offer new insights into how this relationship is differently affected by a persons, neurobiology, personality, and genes under adverse circumstances.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Studying global processing in autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with gaze movements: The example of a copying task

Recent discussions in the literature, along with the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) [2], suggest aetiological commonalities between the highly comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Addressing this discussion requires studying these disorders together by comparing constructs typical to each of them. In the present study, we investigate global processing, known to be difficult for participants with ASD, and Intra-Subject Variability (ISV), known to be consistently increased in participants with ADHD, in groups, aged 10-13 years, with ADHD (n=25), ASD without comorbid ADHD (ASD-) (n=13) and ASD with ADHD (ASD+) (n=18) in comparison with a typically developing group (n=22). A Copying task, typically requiring global processing and in this case particularly designed using equally complex stimuli to also measure ISV across trials, was selected. Oculomotor measures in this task proved to be particularly sensitive to group differences. While increased ISV was not observed in the present task in participants with ADHD, both ASD groups needed to look longer on the figure to be drawn, indicating that global processing takes longer in ASD. However, the ASD+ group needed to fixate on the figure only between drawing movements, whereas the ASD-group needed to do this throughout the drawing process. The present study provides evidence towards ASD and ADHD being separate, not-overlapping, disorders. Since the pure ASD-group was affected more by central coherence problems than the ASD+ group, it may suggest that neuropsychological constructs interact differently in different clinical groups and sub-groups.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Response to Therapeutic Sleep Deprivation: A Naturalistic Study of Clinical and Genetic Factors and Post-Treatment Depressive Symptom Trajectory

Research has shown that therapeutic sleep deprivation (SD) has rapid antidepressant effects in the majority of depressed patients. Investigation of factors preceding and accompanying these effects may facilitate the identification of the underlying biological mechanisms. This exploratory study aimed to examine clinical and genetic factors predicting response to SD and determine the impact of SD on illness course. Mood and tiredness during SD were also assessed via visual analogue scales (VAS). Depressed inpatients (n = 78) and healthy controls (n = 15) underwent ~36hrs of SD. Response to SD was defined as a score of [≤]2 on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Global Improvement. Depressive symptom trajectories were evaluated for up to a month using self/expert ratings. Impact of genetic burden was calculated using polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder. 72% of patients responded to SD. Responders and nonresponders did not differ in baseline self/expert depression symptom ratings, but mood subjectively measured by VAS scale differed. Response was associated with lower age (p = 0.007) and later age at life-time disease onset (p = 0.003). Higher genetic burden of depression was observed in non-responders than healthy controls. Up to a month post-SD, depressive symptoms decreased in both patients groups, but more in responders, in whom effects were sustained. The present findings suggest that re-examining SD with a greater focus on biological mechanisms will lead to better understanding of mechanisms of depression.

epidemiology↗