Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Dworkin, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Dworkin, I..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The Sheep and the Goats: Distinguishing transcriptional enhancers in a complex chromatin landscape

Predicting regulatory function of non-coding DNA using genomic information remains a major goal in genomics, and an important step in interpreting the cis-regulatory code. Regulatory capacity can be partially inferred from transcription factor occupancy, histone modifications, motif enrichment, and evolutionary conservation. However, combinations of these features in well-studied systems such as Drosophila have limited predictive accuracy. Here we examine the current limits of computational enhancer prediction by applying machine-learning methods to an extensive set of genomic features, validating predictions with the Fly Enhancer Resource, which characterized the transcriptional activity of approximately fifteen percent of the genome. Supervised machine learning trained on a range of genomic features identify active elements with a high degree of accuracy, but are less successful at distinguishing tissue-specific expression patterns. Consistent with previous observations of their widespread genomic interactions, many transcription factors were associated with enhancers not known to be direct functional targets. Interestingly, no single factor was necessary for enhancer identification, although binding by the 'pioneer' transcription factor Zelda was the most predictive feature for enhancer activity. Using an increasing number of predictive features improved classification with diminishing returns. Thus, additional single-timepoint ChIP data may have only marginal utility for discerning true regulatory regions. On the other hand, spatially- and temporally-differentiated genomic features may provide more power for this type of computational enhancer identification. Inclusion of new types of information distinct from current chromatin-immunoprecipitation data may enable more precise identification of enhancers, and further insight into the features that distinguish their biological functions.

genomics

Compensatory evolution via cryptic genetic variation: Distinct trajectories to phenotypic and fitness recovery

Populations are constantly exposed to deleterious alleles, most of which are purged via natural selection. However, deleterious fitness effects of alleles can also be suppressed by compensatory adaptation. Compensatory mutations can act directly to reduce deleterious effects of an allele. Alternatively, compensation may also occur by altering other aspects of an organisms phenotype or performance, without suppressing the phenotypic effects of the deleterious allele. Moreover, the origin of allelic variation contributing to compensatory adaptation remains poorly understood. Compensatory evolution driven by mutations that arise during the selective process are well studied. However less is known about the role standing (cryptic) genetic variation plays in compensatory adaptation. To address these questions, we examined evolutionary trajectories of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster fixed for mutations that disrupt wing morphology, resulting in deleterious effects on several components of fitness. Lineages subjected only to natural selection, evolved modifications to courtship behavior and several life history traits without compensation in wing morphology. Yet, we observed rapid phenotypic compensation of wing morphology under artificial selection, consistent with segregating variation for compensatory alleles. We show that alleles contributing to compensation of wing morphology have deleterious effects on other fitness components. These results demonstrate the potential for multiple independent avenues for rapid compensatory adaptation from standing genetic variation, which ultimately may reveal novel adaptive trajectories.

evolutionary biology

How Well Do You Know Your Mutation? Complex Effects Of Genetic Background On Expressivity, Complementation, And Ordering Of Allelic Effects

For a given gene, different mutations influence organismal phenotypes to varying degrees. However, the expressivity of these variants not only depends on the DNA lesion associated with the mutation, but also on factors including the genetic background and rearing environment. The degree to which these factors influence related alleles, genes, or pathways similarly, and whether similar developmental mechanisms underlie variation in the expressivity of a single allele across conditions and variation across alleles is poorly understood. Besides their fundamental biological significance, these questions have important implications for the interpretation of functional genetic analyses, for example, if these factors alter the ordering of allelic series or patterns of complementation. We examined the impact of genetic background and rearing environment for a series of mutations spanning the range of phenotypic effects for both the scalloped and vestigial genes, which influence wing development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetic background and rearing environment influenced the phenotypic outcome of mutations, including intra-genic interactions, particularly for mutations of moderate expressivity. We examined whether cellular correlates (such as cell proliferation during development) of these phenotypic effects matched the observed phenotypic outcome. While cell proliferation decreased with mutations of increasingly severe effects, surprisingly it did not co-vary strongly with the degree of background dependence. We discuss these findings and propose a phenomenological model to aid in understanding the biology of genes, and how this influences our interpretation of allelic effects in genetic analysis.

genetics

The power of a multivariate approach to genome-wide association studies: an example with Drosophila melanogaster wing shape

Due to the complexity of genotype-phenotype relationships, simultaneous analyses of genomic associations with multiple traits will be more powerful and more informative than a series of univariate analyses. In most cases, however, studies of genotype-phenotype relationships have analyzed only one trait at a time, even as the rapid advances in molecular tools have expanded our view of the genotype to include whole genomes. Here, we report the results of a fully integrated multivariate genome-wide association analysis of the shape of the Drosophila melanogaster wing in the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel. Genotypic effects on wing shape were highly correlated between two different labs. We found 2,396 significant SNPs using a 5% FDR cutoff in the multivariate analyses, but just 4 significant SNPs in univariate analyses of scores on the first 20 principal component axes. A key advantage of multivariate analysis is that the direction of the estimated phenotypic effect is much more informative than a univariate one. Exploiting this feature, we show that the directions of effects were on average replicable in an unrelated panel of inbred lines. Effects of knockdowns of genes implicated in the initial screen were on average more similar than expected under a null model. Association studies that take a phenomic approach in considering many traits simultaneously are an important complement to the power of genomics. Multivariate analyses of such data are more powerful, more informative, and allow the unbiased study of pleiotropy.

genetics