Biology subjects

Duronio, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Duronio, R. J..

17 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Differential control of both cell cycle-regulated and quantitative histone mRNA expression by Drosophila Mute

Coupling histone gene expression to S phase of the cell cycle is essential for genome duplication and stability. Activation of Cyclin E/Cdk2 at the G1-S transition stimulates high-level expression of histone genes during S phase, but how histone genes are turned off at the end of S phase is not understood. Here we demonstrate that the essential Drosophila gene mute functions to repress inappropriate histone mRNA accumulation outside of S phase by counteracting Cyclin E/Cdk2-dependent phosphorylation of Mxc, which activates histone gene expression. Additionally, Mute plays contrasting roles in histone gene expression during S phase by promoting high levels of H1, H2a and H2b expression but not H3 and H4. Although Mute is present only at replication-dependent histone genes, its loss leads to 801 differentially regulated genes, primarily those involved in muscle related processes in late-stage embryos. Thus, disruptions of histone gene expression control alters the transcriptome resulting in developmental defects.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Histone H3 availability is more important for development than H3.2 versus H3.3 subtype identity

The distinct contributions of replication-dependent and replication-independent histones to development and genome function remain unclear. In this study, we investigate how the distinct protein identities of the histone H3.2 and H3.3 subtypes contribute to development and gene regulation in Drosophila. Comparing animals in which the replication-independent H3.3 genes were mutated to produce the replication-dependent H3.2 protein with those carrying deletions of the replication-independent H3.3 genes revealed that replication-independent H3.3 is essential for fertility, adult locomotor behavior, and normal longevity. However, development to adulthood does not depend on which replication-independent H3 subtype is expressed from the H3.3 loci. Moreover, replication-independent H3.3 is not required to establish or maintain global patterns of chromatin accessibility or gene expression in the adult brain. Surprisingly, we find that expression of H3.2 from the replication-dependent HisC locus is essential in post-replicative cells in the absence of replication-independent H3.3, and we uncover a critical role for the HIRA histone chaperone complex in preserving genome function when replication-independent H3.3 is deleted. We conclude that an available pool of H3 is more critical than the specific identity of H3 in the pool.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2024

Cell cycle-regulated transcriptional pausing of Drosophila replication-dependent histone genes

Coordinated expression of replication-dependent (RD) histones genes occurs within the Histone Locus Body (HLB) during S phase, but the molecular steps in transcription that are cell cycle regulated are unknown. We report that Drosophila RNA Pol II promotes HLB formation and is enriched in the HLB outside of S phase, including G1-arrested cells that do not transcribe RD histone genes. In contrast, the transcription elongation factor Spt6 is enriched in HLBs only during S phase. Proliferating cells in the wing and eye primordium express full-length histone mRNAs during S phase but express only short nascent transcripts in cells in G1 or G2 consistent with these transcripts being paused and then terminated. Full-length transcripts are produced when Cyclin E/Cdk2 is activated as cells enter S phase. Thus, activation of transcription elongation by Cyclin E/Cdk2 and not recruitment of RNA pol II to the HLB is the critical step that links histone gene expression to cell cycle progression in Drosophila.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Dual roles of histone H3 lysine-4 in antagonizing Polycomb group function and promoting target gene expression

Tight control over cell identity gene expression is necessary for proper adult form and function. The opposing activities of Polycomb and trithorax complexes determine the ON/OFF state of targets like the Hox genes. Trithorax encodes a methyltransferase specific to histone H3 lysine-4 (H3K4). However, there is no direct evidence that H3K4 regulates Polycomb group target genes in vivo. Here, we demonstrate two key roles for replication-dependent histone H3.2K4 in target control. We find that H3.2K4 antagonizes Polycomb group catalytic activity and that it is required for proper target gene activation. We conclude that H3.2K4 directly regulates expression of Polycomb targets.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2024

Redesigning the Drosophila histone gene cluster: An improved genetic platform for spatiotemporal manipulation of histone function

Mutating replication-dependent (RD) histone genes is an important tool for understanding chromatin-based epigenetic regulation. Deploying this tool in metazoan models is particularly challenging because RD histones in these organisms are typically encoded by many genes, often located at multiple loci. Such RD histone gene arrangements make the ability to generate homogenous histone mutant genotypes by site-specific gene editing quite difficult. Drosophila melanogaster provides a solution to this problem because the RD histone genes are organized into a single large tandem array that can be deleted and replaced with transgenes containing mutant histone genes. In the last [~]15 years several different RD histone gene replacement platforms have been developed using this simple strategy. However, each platform contains weaknesses that preclude full use of the powerful developmental genetic capabilities available to Drosophila researchers. Here we describe the development of a newly engineered platform that rectifies many of these weaknesses. We used CRISPR to precisely delete the RD histone gene array (HisC), replacing it with a multifunctional cassette that permits site-specific insertion of either one or two synthetic gene arrays using selectable markers. We designed this cassette with the ability to selectively delete each of the integrated gene arrays in specific tissues using site-specific recombinases. We also present a method for rapidly synthesizing histone gene arrays of any genotype using Golden Gate cloning technologies. These improvements facilitate generation of histone mutant cells in various tissues at different stages of Drosophila development and provide an opportunity to apply forward genetic strategies to interrogate chromatin structure and gene regulation.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2024

Drosophila melanogaster Set8 and L(3)mbt function in gene expression independently of histone H4 lysine 20 methylation

Mono-methylation of Lysine 20 of histone H4 (H4K20me1) is catalyzed by Set8 and thought to play important roles in many aspects of genome function that are mediated by H4K20me-binding proteins. We interrogated this model in a developing animal by comparing in parallel the transcriptomes of Set8null, H4K20R/A, and l(3)mbt mutant Drosophila melanogaster. We found that the gene expression profiles of H4K20A and H4K20R larvae are markedly different than Set8null larvae despite similar reductions in H4K20me1. Set8null mutant cells have a severely disrupted transcriptome and fail to proliferate in vivo, but these phenotypes are not recapitulated by mutation of H4K20 indicating that the developmental defects of Set8null animals are largely due to H4K20me1-independent effects on gene expression. Further, the H4K20me1 binding protein L(3)mbt is recruited to the transcription start sites of most genes independently of H4K20me even though genes bound by L(3)mbt have high levels of H4K20me1. Moreover, both Set8 and L(3)mbt bind to purified H4K20R nucleosomes in vitro. We conclude that gene expression changes in Set8null and H4K20 mutants cannot be explained by loss of H4K20me1 or L(3)mbt binding to chromatin, and therefore that H4K20me1 does not play a large role in gene expression.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

Reduced histone gene copy number disrupts Drosophila Polycomb function

The chromatin of animal cells contains two types of histones: canonical histones that are expressed during S phase of the cell cycle to package the newly replicated genome, and variant histones with specialized functions that are expressed throughout the cell cycle and in non-proliferating cells. Determining whether and how canonical and variant histones cooperate to regulate genome function is integral to understanding how chromatin-based processes affect normal and pathological development. Here, we demonstrate that variant histone H3.3 is essential for Drosophila development only when canonical histone gene copy number is reduced, suggesting that coordination between canonical H3.2 and variant H3.3 expression is necessary to provide sufficient H3 protein for normal genome function. To identify genes that depend upon, or are involved in, this coordinate regulation we screened for heterozygous chromosome 3 deficiencies that impair development of flies bearing reduced H3.2 and H3.3 gene copy number. We identified two regions of chromosome 3 that conferred this phenotype, one of which contains the Polycomb gene, which is necessary for establishing domains of facultative chromatin that repress master regulator genes during development. We further found that reduction in Polycomb dosage decreases viability of animals with no H3.3 gene copies. Moreover, heterozygous Polycomb mutations result in de-repression of the Polycomb target gene Ubx and cause ectopic sex combs when either canonical or variant H3 gene copy number is also reduced. We conclude that Polycomb-mediated facultative heterochromatin function is compromised when canonical and variant H3 gene copy number falls below a critical threshold.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2022

Distinct roles for canonical and variant histone H3 lysine 36 in Polycomb silencing

Polycomb complexes regulate cell-type specific gene expression programs through heritable silencing of target genes. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) is essential for this process. Perturbation of H3K36 is thought to interfere with H3K27me3. We show that mutants of Drosophila replication-dependent (H3.2K36R) or -independent (H3.3K36R) histone H3 genes generally maintain Polycomb silencing and reach later stages of development. In contrast, combined (H3.3K36RH3.2K36R) mutants display widespread Hox gene misexpression and fail to develop past the first larval stage. Chromatin profiling revealed that the H3.2K36R mutation disrupts H3K27me3 levels broadly throughout silenced domains, whereas these regions are mostly unaffected in H3.3K36R animals. Analysis of H3.3 distributions showed that this histone is enriched at presumptive PREs (Polycomb Response Elements) located outside of silenced domains but relatively depleted from those inside. We conclude that H3.2 and H3.3 K36 residues collaborate to repress Hox genes using different mechanisms. Short summaryHistone H3.2 and H3.3 K36 residues ensure Hox gene silencing and enable development by different, but synergistic mechanisms.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

Distinct developmental phenotypes result from mutation of Set8/KMT5A and histone H4 lysine 20 in Drosophila melanogaster

Mono-methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 (H4K20me1) is catalyzed by Set8/KMT5A and regulates numerous aspects of genome organization and function. Loss-of-function mutations in Drosophila melanogaster Set8 or mammalian KMT5A prevent H4K20me1 and disrupt development. Set8/KMT5A also has non-histone substrates, making it difficult to determine which developmental functions of Set8/KMT5A are attributable to H4K20me1 and which to other substrates or to non-catalytic roles. Here, we show that human KMT5A can functionally substitute for Set8 during Drosophila development and that the catalytic SET domains of the two enzymes are fully interchangeable. We also uncovered a role in eye development for the N-terminal domain of Set8 that cannot be complemented by human KMT5A. Whereas Set8null mutants are inviable, we found that an R634G mutation in the SET domain predicted to ablate catalytic activity resulted in viable adults, suggesting important non-catalytic functions of Set8. Similarly, flies that were engineered to express only unmodifiable H4 histones (H4K20A) can also complete development, but they are phenotypically distinct from H4K20R, Set8null, and Set8R634G animals. Taken together, our results demonstrate functional conservation of KMT5A and Set8 enzymes, as well as distinct roles for Set8 and H4K20me1 in Drosophila development.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2022

Mandatory coupling of zygotic transcription to DNA replication in early Drosophila embryos

Collisions between transcribing RNA polymerases and DNA replication forks are disruptive. The threat of collisions is particularly acute during the rapid early embryonic cell cycles of Drosophila when S phase occupies the entirety of interphase. We hypothesized that collision-avoidance mechanisms safeguard the onset of zygotic transcription in these cycles. To explore this hypothesis, we used real-time imaging of transcriptional events at the onset of each interphase. Endogenously tagged RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) abruptly formed clusters before nascent transcripts accumulated, indicating recruitment prior to transcriptional engagement. Injection of inhibitors of DNA replication prevented RNAPII clustering, blocked formation of foci of the pioneer factor Zelda, and largely prevented expression of transcription reporters. Knockdown of Zelda or the histone acetyltransferase CBP prevented RNAPII cluster formation except at the replication-dependent (RD) histone gene locus. We suggest a model in which the passage of replication forks allows Zelda and a distinct pathway at the RD histone locus to reconfigure chromatin to nucleate RNAPII clustering and promote transcriptional initiation. The replication dependency of these events defers initiation of transcription and ensures that RNA polymerases transcribe behind advancing replication forks. The resulting coordination of transcription and replication explains how early embryos circumvent collisions and promote genome stability.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

SUMM4 complex couples insulator function and DNA replication timingcontrol

AbstractAsynchronous replication of chromosome domains during S phase is essential for eukaryotic genome function, but the mechanisms establishing which domains replicate early versus late in different cell types remain incompletely understood. Drosophila SNF2-related factor SUUR imparts under- replication of late-replicating intercalary heterochromatin in polytene chromosomes. SUUR negatively regulates DNA replication fork progression; however, its mechanism of action remains obscure. Here we developed a novel method termed MS-Enabled Rapid protein Complex Identification (MERCI) to isolate a stable stoichiometric native complex SUMM4 that comprises SUUR and a chromatin boundary protein Mod(Mdg4)-67.2. Mod(Mdg4) stimulates SUUR ATPase activity and is required for a normal spatiotemporal distribution of SUUR in vivo. SUUR and Mod(Mdg4)-67.2 together mediate the activities of gypsy insulator that prevent certain enhancer-promoter interactions and establish euchromatin-heterochromatin barriers in the genome. Furthermore, SuUR or mod(mdg4) mutations reverse under-replication of intercalary heterochromatin. Thus, SUMM4 can impart late replication of intercalary heterochromatin by attenuating the progression of replication forks through euchromatin/heterochromatin boundaries. Our findings reveal that DNA replication can be delayed by a chromatin barrier and uncover a critical role for architectural proteins in replication control. They suggest a mechanism for replication timing that does not depend on an asynchronous firing of replication origins.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2020

Drosophila Histone Locus Body assembly and function involves multiple interactions

The histone locus body (HLB) assembles at replication-dependent (RD) histone loci and concentrates factors required for RD histone mRNA biosynthesis. The D. melanogaster genome has a single locus comprised of [~]100 copies of a tandemly arrayed repeat unit containing one copy of each of the 5 RD histone genes. To determine sequence elements required for D. melanogaster HLB formation and histone gene expression, we used transgenic gene arrays containing 12 copies of the histone repeat unit that functionally complement loss of the [~]200 endogenous RD histone genes. A 12x histone gene array in which all H3-H4 promoters were replaced with H2a-H2b promoters does not form an HLB or express high levels of RD histone mRNA in the presence of the endogenous histone genes. In contrast, this same transgenic array is active in HLB assembly and RD histone gene expression in the absence of the endogenous RD histone genes and rescues the lethality caused by homozygous deletion of the RD histone locus. The HLB formed in the absence of endogenous RD histone genes on the mutant 12x array contains all known factors present in the wild type HLB including CLAMP, which normally binds to GAGA repeats in the H3-H4 promoter. These data suggest that multiple protein-protein and/or protein-DNA interactions contribute to HLB formation, and that the large number of endogenous RD histone gene copies sequester available factor(s) from attenuated transgenic arrays, thereby preventing HLB formation and gene expression.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Rif1 functions in a tissue-specific manner to control replication timing through its PP1-binding motif

Replication initiation in eukaryotic cells occurs asynchronously throughout S phase, yielding early and late replicating regions of the genome, a process known as replication timing (RT). RT changes during development to ensure accurate genome duplication and maintain genome stability. To understand the relative contributions that cell lineage, cell cycle, and replication initiation regulators have on RT, we utilized the powerful developmental systems available in Drosophila melanogaster. We generated and compared RT profiles from mitotic cells of different tissues and from mitotic and endocycling cells of the same tissue. Our results demonstrate that cell lineage has the largest effect on RT, whereas switching from a mitotic to an endoreplicative cell cycle has little to no effect on RT. Additionally, we demonstrate that the RT differences we observed in all cases are largely independent of transcriptional differences. We also employed a genetic approach in these same cell types to understand the relative contribution the eukaryotic RT control factor, Rif1, has on RT control. Our results demonstrate that Rif1 can function in a tissue-specific manner to control RT. Importantly, the Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding motif of Rif1 is essential for Rif1 to regulate RT. Together, our data support a model in which the RT program is primarily driven by cell lineage and is further refined by Rif1/PP1 to ultimately generate tissue-specific RT programs.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2019

CDK-regulated phase separation seeded by histone genes ensures precise growth and function of Histone Locus Bodies

Many membrane-less organelles form through liquid-liquid phase separation, but how their size is controlled and whether size is linked to function remain poorly understood. The Histone Locus Body (HLB) is an evolutionarily conserved nuclear body that regulates the transcription and processing of histone mRNAs. Here, we show that Drosophila HLBs form through phase separation of the scaffold protein multi-sex combs (Mxc). The size of HLBs is controlled in a precise and dynamic manner that is dependent on the cell cycle and zygotic gene activation. Control of HLB growth is achieved by a mechanism integrating nascent mRNAs at the histone locus, which catalyzes phase separation, and the nuclear concentration of Mxc, which is controlled by the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases. Reduced Cdk2 activity results in smaller HLBs and the appearance of nascent, misprocessed histone mRNAs. Our experiments thus identify a mechanism linking nuclear body growth and size with gene expression.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Functional redundancy of variant and canonical histone H3 lysine 9 modification in Drosophila

Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) and differential incorporation of variant and canonical histones into chromatin are central modes of epigenetic regulation. Despite similar protein sequences, histone variants are enriched for different suites of PTMs compared to their canonical counterparts. For example, variant histone H3.3 occurs primarily in transcribed regions and is enriched for \"active\" histone PTMs like Lys9 acetylation (H3.3K9ac), whereas the canonical histone H3 is enriched for Lys9 methylation (H3K9me), which is found in transcriptionally silent heterochromatin. To determine the functions of K9 modification on variant versus canonical H3, we compared the phenotypes caused by engineering H3.3K9R and H3K9R mutant genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Whereas most H3.3K9R and a small number of H3K9R mutant animals are capable of completing development and do not have substantially altered protein coding transcriptomes, all H3.3K9R H3K9R combined mutants die soon after embryogenesis and display decreased expression of genes enriched for K9ac. These data suggest that the role of K9ac in gene activation during development can be provided by either H3 or H3.3. Conversely, we found that H3.3K9 is methylated at telomeric transposons, and this mark contributes to repressive chromatin architecture, supporting a role for H3.3 in heterochromatin that is distinct from that of H3. Thus, our genetic and molecular analyses demonstrate that K9 modification of variant and canonical H3 have overlapping roles in development and transcriptional regulation, though to differing extents in euchromatin and heterochromatin.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Transcription start site profiling uncovers divergent transcription and enhancer-associated RNAs in Drosophila melanogaster

BackgroundHigh-resolution transcription start site (TSS) mapping in D. melanogaster embryos and cell lines has revealed a rich and detailed landscape of both cis- and trans-regulatory elements and factors. However, TSS profiling has not been investigated in an orthogonal in vivo setting. Here, we present a comprehensive dataset that links TSS dynamics with nucleosome occupancy and gene expression in the wandering third instar larva, a developmental stage characterized by large-scale shifts in transcriptional programs in preparation for metamorphosis.\n\nResultsThe data recapitulate major regulatory classes of TSSs, based on peak width, promoter-proximal polymerase pausing, and cis-regulatory element density. We confirm the paucity of divergent transcription units in D. melanogaster, but also identify notable exceptions. Furthermore, we identify thousands of novel initiation events occurring at unannotated TSSs that can be classified into functional categories by their local density of histone modifications. Interestingly, a sub-class of these unannotated TSSs overlaps with functionally validated enhancer elements, consistent with a regulatory role for \"enhancer RNAs\" (eRNAs) in defining transcriptional programs that are important for animal development.\n\nConclusionsHigh-depth TSS mapping is a powerful strategy for identifying and characterizing low-abundance and/or low-stability RNAs. Global analysis of transcription initiation patterns in a developing organism reveals a vast number of novel initiation events that identify potential eRNAs as well as other non-coding transcripts critical for animal development.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Histone gene replacement reveals a post-transcriptional role for H3K36 in maintaining metazoan transcriptome fidelity

Histone H3 lysine 36 methylation (H3K36me) is thought to participate in a host of co-transcriptional regulatory events. To study the function of this residue independent from the enzymes that modify it, we used a \"histone replacement\" system in Drosophila to generate a non-modifiable H3K36 lysine-to-arginine (H3K36R) mutant. We observed global dysregulation of mRNA levels in H3K36R animals that correlates with the incidence of H3K36me3. Similar to previous studies, we found that mutation of H3K36 also resulted in H4 hyperacetylation. However, neither cryptic transcription initiation, nor alternative pre-mRNA splicing, contributed to the observed changes in expression, in contrast with previously reported roles for H3K36me. Interestingly, knockdown of the RNA surveillance nuclease, Xrn1, and members of the CCR4-Not deadenylase complex, restored mRNA levels for a class of downregulated, H3K36me3-rich genes. We propose a posttranscriptional role for modification of replication-dependent H3K36 in the control of metazoan gene expression.\n\nImpact StatementPost-translational modification of histone H3K36 is neither required to suppress cryptic transcription initiation nor to include alternative exons in Drosophila; instead it promotes expression of active genes by stimulating polyadenylation.

molecular biology↗