Dunn, J. L. M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Metabolite mimicry identifies butyrate analogs with select protective functions in the intestinal mucosa

Microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids regulate a variety of pathways in the healthy colonic mucosa. In particular, butyrate serves as the primary energy source for colonocytes and regulates gene transcription by stabilizing the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible-factors (HIF) and functioning as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. A limitation of butyrate as a therapeutic is its rapid metabolism in differentiated colonocytes. Furthermore, intestinal stem cells (ISCs) respond differently to butyrate, preferentially using glucose for energy procurement. To address these limitations, we explored metabolite-mimicry to discover compounds with potent or selective biological responses within the butyrate pathway(s). We discovered an analog, 3-chlorobutyrate (3-Cl BA), that significantly enhances epithelial barrier formation and wound healing in vitro. Mechanistically, we revealed that 3-Cl BA is a potent HDAC inhibitor. Furthermore, unlike butyrate, 3-Cl BA does not stabilize HIF and it is not used as metabolic fuel. In vivo studies in a DSS-colitis model revealed that contrary to butyrate, 3-Cl BA is protective. Studies in stem-like colonoids demonstrated that only butyrate inhibits ISC proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, it was recently reported that HIF stabilization inhibits ISCs activity. Given the fact that butyrate but not 3-Cl BA stabilizes HIF, we surmised that 3-Cl BA would circumvent these detrimental functional consequences. We demonstrate here that pharmacologic HIF stabilization inhibits colonoid differentiation and that genetic loss of HIF significantly promotes ISC differentiation. This study reveals a promising butyrate analog protective in colitis and demonstrates the advantages of metabolite-mimicry to dissect selective biological functions from major metabolites in the gut. Significance statementButyrate is a well-studied microbial short-chain fatty acid that regulates a number of mucosal pathways and is paramount in maintaining intestinal integrity. In health, it is a major source of energy for colonocytes and regulates gene transcription. The role of butyrate in disease is still controversial and not well understood. When butyrate is not metabolized or well-utilized (e.g. disease), it accumulates in intestinal stem cells leading to reduced cell proliferation and differentiation, thereby hampering intestinal barrier recovery. In this study, we describe a butyrate analog that enhances epithelial barrier formation and wound healing. Furthermore, as opposed to native butyrate, this butyrate analog is protective in a colitis mouse model and does not exhibit detrimental influences on intestinal stem cells. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=140 SRC="FIGDIR/small/697087v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dd0f0borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d27forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e5d07corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dab74f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstractC_FLOATNO Microbially derived butyrate plays a key role in intestinal homeostasis. It is the primary source of energy for colonocytes, contributing to a metabolic and oxygen gradient as it is metabolized by differentiated cells along the intestinal crypt. Through the regulation of transcription factors such as HIF and the inhibition of HDAC, it regulates barrier formation and wound healing promoting a strong tight junction profile. Furthermore, well oxygenated ISCs at the bottom of the crypt are unaccustomed to the effects of butyrate, including HIF stabilization (left). In disease, loss of intestinal architecture leads to a disrupted metabolic/oxygen gradient where butyrate accumulates in stem cells leading to decreased proliferation, differentiation, and increases in apoptosis. 3-Cl BA selectively acts as an HDACi and does not stabilize HIF, exhibiting no significant detrimental effects on ISCs (right). Created in BioRender. Ornelas, A. (2026) https://BioRender.com/x9cy8mw C_FIG

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Three Distinct Transcriptional Profiles of Monocytes Correlate with Disease Activity in SSc Patients

Background/PurposePatients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) display a complex clinical phenotype. There are numerous studies that relate transcriptional signatures from PBMC or whole skin of SSc patients to disease activity. However, analyses of whole tissue RNA-sequencing studies are subjected to changes in cellular composition that can drive gene expression signatures and a loss of the ability to detect biologically important transcriptional changes within minority cell populations. Here, we focused on circulating monocytes, which have been shown to exist as two central populations classical (CM) and non-classical (NCM). MethodsSSc patients were recruited from four different sites that form PRESS: Northwestern University, University of Texas, University of Michigan and University of Utah. Comprehensive clinical data was collected for all patients. We isolated CM and NCM from these patients and age, sex, and race-matched healthy volunteers were used as controls. RNA-seq was performed on CM and NCM populations as well as on isolated bulk macrophages from skin. ResultsWe first performed RNA-seq on CM, which are the predominant population in circulation. In order to capture the variability across the SSc cohort, we defined 1790 differentially expressed genes in each patient. We then used these genes to cluster patients into 3 subgroups: Groups A-C. Group A exhibited the strongest interferon signature and innate immune pathways. Group B patients expressed genes in the same pathways but was also enriched for response to cAMP and corticosteroids. Both Group B and Group C exhibited upregulation of genes associated with vasculature development and blood vessel formation. Group C uniquely upregulated TGFB pathways. Next, we performed RNA-seq on NCM isolated from the same patients. When NCM were clustered based on the same 1790 genes as CM, we found that Groups A and C were recapitulated, while Group B was less cohesive. Our analysis stratified SSc patients based on their transcriptional profiles in monocytes but was agnostic to their clinical presentation. We found that Group B and C patients exhibited significantly worsened lung function at the time of monocyte isolation than Group A patients. However, there were no significant differences in skin disease. We then isolated macrophages from skin biopsies of SSc patients and showed that the transcriptional profile of Group A and C in SSc patients was conserved. We also used gene expression data from another study on monocytes which stratified patients based on disease presentation. We found that Group A accurately distinguished dcSSc and ncSSc patients from controls, but not lcSSc. ConclusionWe are the first to show that transcriptomic analysis of classical and non-classical circulating monocytes can unbiasedly stratify SSc patients and correlate with disease activity outcome measures.

genomics↗