Dujardin, K. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2019

Detecting M/EEG modular brain states in rest and task

The human brain is a dynamic networked system that continually reconfigures its connectivity patterns over time. Thus, developing approaches able to adequately detect fast brain dynamics is critical. Of particular interest are the methods that analyze the modular structure of brain networks, i.e. the presence of clusters of regions that are densely inter-connected. In this paper, we propose a novel framework to identify fast modular states that dynamically fluctuate over time during rest and task. We validated our method using MEG data recorded during a finger movement task, identifying modular states linking somatosensory and primary motor regions. The algorithm was also validated on dense-EEG data recorded during picture naming task, revealing the sub-second transition between several modular states which relate to visual processing, semantic processing and language. Next, we validated our method on a dataset of resting state dense-EEG signals recorded from 124 patients with Parkinson disease and different cognitive phenotypes. Results disclosed brain modular states that differentiate cognitively intact patients, patients with moderate cognitive deficits and patients with severe cognitive deficits. Our new approach tracks the brain modular states, in healthy subjects and patients, on an adequate task-specific timescale.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Small effect size leads to reproducibility failure in resting-state fMRI studies

Thousands of papers using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) have been published on brain disorders. Results in each paper may have survived correction for multiple comparison. However, since there have been no robust results from large scale meta-analysis, we do not know how many of published results are truly positives. The present meta-analytic work included 60 original studies, with 57 studies (4 datasets, 2266 participants) that used a between-group design and 3 studies (1 dataset, 107 participants) that employed a within-group design. To evaluate the effect size of brain disorders, a very large neuroimaging dataset ranging from neurological to psychiatric isorders together with healthy individuals have been analyzed. Parkinsons disease off levodopa (PD-off) included 687 participants from 15 studies. PD on levodopa (PD-on) included 261 participants from 9 studies. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) included 958 participants from 27 studies. The meta-analyses of a metric named amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) showed that the effect size (Hedges g) was 0.19 - 0.39 for the 4 datasets using between-group design and 0.46 for the dataset using within-group design. The effect size of PD-off, PD-on and ASD were 0.23, 0.39, and 0.19, respectively. Using the meta-analysis results as the robust results, the between-group design results of each study showed high false negative rates (median 99%), high false discovery rates (median 86%), and low accuracy (median 1%), regardless of whether stringent or liberal multiple comparison correction was used. The findings were similar for 4 RS-fMRI metrics including ALFF, regional homogeneity, and degree centrality, as well as for another widely used RS-fMRI metric namely seed-based functional connectivity. These observations suggest that multiple comparison correction does not control for false discoveries across multiple studies when the effect sizes are relatively small. Meta-analysis on un-thresholded t-maps is critical for the recovery of ground truth. We recommend that to achieve high reproducibility through meta-analysis, the neuroimaging research field should share raw data or, at minimum, provide un-thresholded statistical images.

neuroscience↗