Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dreiss, L. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Dreiss, L. M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A comprehensive analysis of grazing: Improving management for environmental health

In an effort to combat the dual climate and biodiversity crises, the international community has put forth targets to reduce emissions and protect species. Habitat degradation is at the fore in driving species extinctions and carbon loss, creating an urgent need to examine our land-use practices if we are to meet international goals. Individual nations will have differing needs and approaches to reaching these objectives based on their landscapes, industries, and levels of historic overuse. In the United States, grazing is the leading land-use, making up approximately one-third of the country. Here we present a broad-scale analysis of how grazing effects the environment and examine how this land-use plays out across the U.S. This review can help policy makers and land managers strategically assess grazing lands as we work towards a national landscape that supports equitable ecosystem services, sustainable livelihoods, and climate resilience. HighlightsO_LILivestock grazing can have a multitude of effects on local ecosystems often causing habitat degradation and loss. As this land-use makes up a third of U.S. lands, improving grazing practices could provide significant benefits for the environment. C_LIO_LITo our knowledge, this is the largest review of U.S. grazing to date. We explore how grazing affects six elements of the environment across the country. C_LIO_LIWhile the majority of literature discusses negative implications related to grazing, our results indicate that regions are affected differently, and that management and livestock-type also contribute to the overall environmental impact. C_LI

ecology↗

Targeting current species ranges and carbon stocks fails to conserve biodiversity in a changing climate: opportunities to support climate adaptation under 30x30

Protecting areas for climate adaptation will be essential to ensuring greater opportunity for species conservation well into the future. However, many proposals for protected areas expansion focus on our understanding of current spatial patterns, which may be ineffective surrogates for future needs. A science-driven call to address the biodiversity and climate crises by conserving at least 30% of lands and waters by 2030, 30x30, presents new opportunities to inform the siting of new protections globally and in the U.S. Here we identify climate refugia and corridors based on a weighted combination of currently available models; compare them to current biodiversity hotspots and carbon-rich areas to understand how 30x30 protections siting may be biased by data omission; and compare identified refugia and corridors to the Protected Areas Database to assess current levels of protection. Available data indicate that 20.5% and 27.5% of identified climate adaptation areas (refugia and/or corridor) coincides with current imperiled species hotspots and carbon-rich areas, respectively. With only 12.5% of climate refugia and corridors protected, a continued focus on current spatial patterns in species and carbon richness will not inherently conserve places critical for climate adaptation. However, there is ample opportunity for establishing future-minded protections: 52% of the contiguous U.S. falls into the top quartile of values for at least one class of climate refugia. Nearly 27% is already part of the protected areas network but managed for multiple uses that may limit their ability to contribute to the goals of 30x30. Additionally, nearly two-thirds of nationally identified refugia coincide with ecoregion-specific refugia suggesting representation of nearly all ecoregions in national efforts focused on conserving climate refugia. Based on these results, we recommend that land planners and managers make more explicit policy priorities and strategic decisions for future-minded protections and climate adaptation.

ecology↗

Degradation of visible autumn icons and conservation opportunities: trends in deciduous forest loss in the contiguous US

Temperate deciduous forests are one of the most visible biomes on Earth because of their autumn aesthetics and because they harbor some of the most heavily populated regions. Their ability to attract visitors may increase opportunities for people to experience nature, which has been linked to greater conservation action. Identifying regions with high leaf-peeping opportunities and regions where color has been lost to landscape conversion may help to inform these connections. We use spatial overlay analyses to quantify temperate deciduous forest coverage, disturbance, and protections in each U.S. ecoregion. We evaluated recent (1984-2016) and predicted (2016-2050) disturbance under extreme future scenarios. Almost all ecoregions saw a decline in deciduous forest cover between 1985 and 2016. Some ecoregions with the greatest opportunities for leaf-peeping are also underrepresented in the protected areas network and vulnerable to additional losses. Under economic-growth forecasting scenarios, losses are predicted to continue. However, environmentally focused scenarios suggest there is still opportunity to reverse deciduous forest loss in some ecoregions. Differences in forest loss between predictions scenarios emphasize the importance of human approaches in securing environmental stability. Increasing public exposure to temperate forests may help ensure conservation of more natural areas and preserve the quantity and quality of autumn forest viewing. Key PointsO_LITemperate deciduous forests aesthetics attract visitors to experience nature, but degradation and loss can hinder connections. C_LIO_LIUS ecoregions with the greatest leaf-peeping opportunities are underrepresented in the protected areas and vulnerable to additional losses. C_LIO_LIDifferences in predictions scenarios emphasize the importance of conservation action, which may be linked to human connections with nature. C_LI

ecology↗

Dimensions of passerine biodiversity along an elevational gradient: a nexus for historical biogeography and contemporary ecology

AimThe incorporation of functional and phylogenetic information is necessary to comprehensively characterize spatial patterns of biodiversity and to evaluate the relative importance of ecological and evolutionary mechanisms in molding such patterns. We evaluated the relative importance of mechanisms that shape passerine biodiversity along an extensive elevational gradient. LocationManu Biosphere Reserve in the Peruvian Andes TaxonSongbirds (order Passeriformes) MethodsWe quantified elevational gradients of species richness, phylogenetic biodiversity, and functional biodiversity for all passerines as well as separately for suboscines and oscines; determined if phylogenetic or functional biodiversity was consistent with random selection or if there was evidence of particular mechanisms dominating community assembly; and compared patterns for each dimension of biodiversity for the two suborders. ResultsFor all passerines and for suboscines, species richness decreased in a saturating fashion, phylogenetic biodiversity declined linearly, and functional biodiversity was stochastic along the elevation gradient. For oscines, species richness and phylogenetic biodiversity decreased linearly, and functional biodiversity decreased in a saturating fashion. Main conclusionsElevational gradients of biodiversity at Manu result from a combination of adaptations associated with radiations that occurred elsewhere (suboscines in Amazonian lowlands, oscines in colder climes of North America) and an in situ radiation in the Andes (tanagers). Our results suggest a combination of temperature-related physiological constraints and a reduction in functional redundancy associated with decreasing resource abundance at higher elevations molded the passerine assemblages along this elevational gradient. Explicit consideration of historical biogeography and conservatism of ancestral niches is necessary to comprehensively understand the mechanisms that mold gradients of biodiversity.

ecology↗

Integrating multiple dimensions of biodiversity to inform global parrot conservation

Because biodiversity is increasingly threatened by habitat destruction and climate change, conservation agencies face challenges associated with an uncertain future. In addition to changes associated with climate and land use, parrots are threatened by hunting and capture for the pet trade, making them the most at-risk order of birds in the world. Parrots provide key ecosystem services, but remain understudied compared to other major bird orders despite their high extinction risk and ecological importance. Species richness is often used to identify high priority areas for conserving biodiversity. By definition, richness considers all species to be equally different. However, ongoing research emphasizes the importance of incorporating ecological functions (functional diversity) or evolutionary relationships (phylogenetic diversity) to more fully understand patterns of biodiversity, suggesting that using functional and phylogenetic information could improve conservation strategies. These distinctions among dimensions of biodiversity are important, because (1) areas of high species richness do not always represent areas of high functional or phylogenetic diversity, and (2) functional or phylogenetic diversity may better predict ecosystem function and evolutionary potential, which are essential for effective long-term conservation policy and management.\n\nOur objective was to create a framework for identifying areas of high species richness, functional diversity, and phylogenetic diversity within the global distribution of parrots We combined species richness, functional diversity, and phylogenetic diversity into an Integrated Biodiversity Index (IBI) to identify global biodiversity hotspots for parrots. We found important spatial mismatches among dimensions, which demonstrate that species richness is not always an effective proxy for other dimensions of parrot biodiversity. The IBI is an integrative and flexible index that can incorporate multiple dimensions of biodiversity, resulting in an intuitive and more direct way of assessing comprehensive goals in conservation planning (i.e., healthy ecosystem functioning and climate change resilience).

ecology↗