Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dorfmeyer, R. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Dorfmeyer, R. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-domain analysis of the fecal microbiome of dairy heifers, beef heifers, bred beef heifers, and adult beef cows in the central United States using paired 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA metabarcoding

The growth and performance of cattle is dependent on efficient feed conversion, facilitated by the gut microbiome, including both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Extrinsic factors such as management practices and intrinsic factors like age and genetics can shape these communities. To characterize the relative effects of such factors on the prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes, fresh fecal samples from dairy heifers (n = 8), beef heifers (n = 8), bred beef heifers (n = 8), and adult beef cows (n = 8) were subjected to paired 16S rRNA (V4) and a novel 18S rRNA (V4-V5) metabarcoding assay, and 18S rRNA amplicons were annotated using two databases in parallel. Taxonomic resolution of 18S rRNA amplicons was excellent, with SILVA and EUKARYOME databases each providing better resolution of different groups of organisms. While no differences in eukaryotic richness or alpha diversity were detected, beta diversity differed in all pairwise comparisons except between beef heifers and bred beef heifers. Prokaryotic richness was lower in adult beef cows than the other groups, and beta diversity differed in all pairwise comparisons. Adult beef cows were the most distinct, characterized by replacement of fungal organisms with protozoa and loss of thermophilic bacteria in the eukaryotic and prokaryotic compartments, respectively. Among numerous differentially abundant features, dairy heifers harbored greater abundance of Cooperia oncophora while beef heifers contained greater abundance of Buxtonella sulcata and Mucor. Correlation network analysis revealed multiple significant positive and negative associations between bacterial, fungal, and protozoal features during maturation of the fecal microbiome. Collectively, these data highlight the richness and diversity of both the prokaryotic and eukaryotic compartments of the bovine fecal microbiome, and the influence of management practices and age on both communities. From a technical standpoint, these data demonstrate the ability to resolve fungal, protozoal, and metazoan organisms, including potential parasites and pathogens, with a single metabarcoding assay. They also highlight the nuanced differences between databases and the value of parallel analyses using more than one database.

systems biology↗

A novel dataset of 2,362 equine fecal microbiomes from eight veterinary teaching hospital on three continents reveals dominant effects of geography, breed, and disease

Horses and other equids are reliant on the gut microbiome for health, and studies have reported associations between certain clinical conditions and features of the fecal microbiome. However, research to date on the equine fecal microbiome has often relied on small sample sizes collected from single and relatively localized geographic regions. Previous work largely employs single timepoint analyses, or horses selected based on limited health criteria. To address these issues and expand our understanding of the core microbiome in health, and the changes associated with adverse outcomes, the Equine Gut Group (EGG) has collected and performed 16S rRNA sequencing on 2,362 fecal samples from 1,190 healthy and affected horses. Here we present the EGG database and demonstrate its utility in characterizing the equine microbiome in health and acute gastrointestinal disease. The EGG 16S rRNA database is a valuable resource to study the equine microbiome and its role in equine health.

microbiology↗

Effect size of delayed freezing, diurnal variation, and hindgut location on the mouse fecal microbiome relative to a standardized biological variable

BackgroundWhile murine fecal collection is central to microbiome research, there are a number of practical considerations that may vary during fecal sample collection, including time to sample storage, time of day the sample is collected, and position within the colon during terminal collections. While the need to control these factors is recognized, the relative effect on microbial community of duration at room temperature, time of day, and hindgut position, in the context of a known biological variable, is unclear. To answer these questions, and assess reproducibility of results across different microbiome compositions, parallel experiments were performed to investigate the effect of those factors on the microbiome of age- and sex-matched isogenic mice colonized with two different vendor-origin microbiomes. Results16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data from flash-frozen fecal samples showed no statistical difference in alpha or beta diversity compared to samples incubated for 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 hours at room temperature. Overall, samples collected in the AM period showed greater richness and alpha-diversity compared to samples collected in the PM period. While a significant effect of time was detected in all hindgut regions, the effect increased from cecum to distal colon. When using two vendor-origin microbiomes as a biological variable, its effect size vastly outweighed the effect size of the time samples spent at room temperature, the time of day samples were collected, and the position within the colon from which samples were collected. ConclusionsThis study has highlighted multiple scenarios encountered in microbiome research that may affect outcome measures of microbial diversity and composition. Unexpectedly, delayed time to sample cold storage up to nine hours did not affect the alpha or global beta diversity of fecal sample. We then presented evidence of location- and time-dependent effects within the hindgut on microbial richness, diversity, and composition. We finally demonstrated a relatively low effect size of these technical factors when compared to a primary experimental factor with large intergroup variability.

microbiology↗