Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network,

Publications and source records attributed to Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network,.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The NORAD-pumilio regulatory axis links lncRNA dysregulation to tau propagation-associated phenotypes

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are increasingly implicated in neurodegenerative disease, yet their roles in tauopathy remain poorly understood. Here, we defined the lncRNA landscape across iPSC-derived neurons, astrocytes, and microglia harboring the frontotemporal dementia-associated MAPT IVS10+16 mutation and investigated how lncRNA dysregulation interfaces with tau pathology. Transcriptomic analyses revealed extensive cell-type specific lncRNA expression changes, with neurons exhibiting the greatest degree of mutation-associated remodeling. Comparative analyses with MAPT IVS10+16 patient brain tissue identified NORAD and MIR22HG as lncRNAs significantly dysregulated across all three cell types and human brains. NORAD was also altered in Alzheimers disease and Parkinsons disease brains, suggesting a broader role in neurodegenerative disease. Mechanistically, NORAD-associated protein networks converged on pathways related to RNA regulation, cytoskeletal organization, proteostasis, and tau interaction networks. Given the established role of NORAD in regulating PUM1 and PUM2 RNA-binding (pumilio) proteins, we examined the NORAD-pumilio axis and identified enrichment of pumilio-associated pathways linked to autophagy, endocytosis, proteostasis, and cytoskeletal regulation. NORAD depletion reduced tau seeding and uptake, whereas functional depletion of PUM1 or PUM2 increased both processes, supporting an antagonistic relationship between NORAD and pumilio signaling in modulation of tau aggregation. Together, these findings identify widespread lncRNA dysregulation across neural cell types in the setting of a MAPT mutation and nominate the NORAD-pumilio axis as a regulatory pathway linking RNA homeostasis and tau propagation biology.

neuroscience↗

Increasing hub disruption parallels dementia severity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease

Hub regions in the brain, recognized for their roles in ensuring efficient information transfer, are vulnerable to pathological alterations in neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer Disease (AD). Given their essential role in neural communication, disruptions to these hubs have profound implications for overall brain network integrity and functionality. Hub disruption, or targeted impairment of functional connectivity at the hubs, is recognized in AD patients. Computational models paired with evidence from animal experiments hint at a mechanistic explanation, suggesting that these hubs may be preferentially targeted in neurodegeneration, due to their high neuronal activity levels--a phenomenon termed "activity-dependent degeneration". Yet, two critical issues were unresolved. First, past research hasnt definitively shown whether hub regions face a higher likelihood of impairment (targeted attack) compared to other regions or if impairment likelihood is uniformly distributed (random attack). Second, human studies offering support for activity-dependent explanations remain scarce. We applied a refined hub disruption index to determine the presence of targeted attacks in AD. Furthermore, we explored potential evidence for activity-dependent degeneration by evaluating if hub vulnerability is better explained by global connectivity or connectivity variations across functional systems, as well as comparing its timing relative to amyloid beta deposition in the brain. Our unique cohort of participants with autosomal dominant Alzheimer Disease (ADAD) allowed us to probe into the preclinical stages of AD to determine the hub disruption timeline in relation to expected symptom emergence. Our findings reveal a hub disruption pattern in ADAD aligned with targeted attacks, detectable even in pre-clinical stages. Notably, the disruptions severity amplified alongside symptomatic progression. Moreover, since excessive local neuronal activity has been shown to increase amyloid deposition and high connectivity regions show high level of neuronal activity, our observation that hub disruption was primarily tied to regional differences in global connectivity and sequentially followed changes observed in A{beta} PET cortical markers is consistent with the activity-dependent degeneration model. Intriguingly, these disruptions were discernible 8 years before the expected age of symptom onset. Taken together, our findings not only align with the targeted attack on hubs model but also suggest that activity-dependent degeneration might be the cause of hub vulnerability. This deepened understanding could be instrumental in refining diagnostic techniques and developing targeted therapeutic strategies for AD in the future.

neuroscience↗

Differentiating amyloid beta spread in autosomal dominant and sporadic Alzheimer's disease

Amyloid-beta (A{beta}) deposition is one of the hallmark pathologies in both sporadic Alzheimers disease (sAD) and autosomal dominant Alzheimers disease (ADAD), the latter of which is caused by mutations in genes involved in A{beta} processing. Despite A{beta} deposition being a centerpiece to both sAD and ADAD, some differences between these AD subtypes have been observed with respect to the spatial pattern of A{beta}. Previous work has shown that the spatial pattern of A{beta} in individuals spanning the sAD spectrum can be reproduced with high accuracy using an epidemic spreading model (ESM), which simulates the diffusion of A{beta} across neuronal connections and is constrained by individual rates of A{beta} production and clearance. However, it has not been investigated whether A{beta} deposition in the rarer ADAD can be modeled in the same way, and if so, how congruent the spreading patterns of A{beta} across sAD and ADAD are. We leverage the ESM as a data-driven approach to probe individual-level variation in the spreading patterns of A{beta} across three different large-scale imaging datasets (2 SAD, 1 ADAD). We applied the ESM separately to the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging initiative (N=737), the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (N=510), and the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimers Network (N=249), the latter two of which were processed using an identical pipeline. We assessed inter- and intra-individual model performance in each dataset separately, and further identified the most likely epicenter of A{beta} spread for each individual. Using epicenters defined in previous work in sAD, the ESM provided moderate prediction of the regional pattern of A{beta} deposition across all three datasets. We further find that, while the most likely epicenter for most A{beta}-positive subjects overlaps with the default mode network, 13% of ADAD individuals were best characterized by a striatal origin of A{beta} spread. These subjects were also distinguished by being younger than ADAD subjects with a DMN A{beta} origin, despite having a similar estimated age of symptom onset. Together, our results suggest that most ADAD patients express A{beta} spreading patters similar to those of sAD, but that there may be a subset of ADAD patients with a separate, striatal phenotype.

neuroscience↗