Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Doebele, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Doebele, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

EGFR suppression and drug-induced potentiation are widespread features of oncogenic RTK fusions

Regulation of cancer cells by their environment contributes to tumorigenesis and drug response, though the extent to which the oncogenic state can alter a cells perception of its environment is not clear. Prior studies found that EML4-ALK, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusion oncoprotein, suppresses transmembrane receptor signaling through EGFR. Moreover, suppression was reversed with targeted ALK inhibition, thereby promoting survival and drug tolerance. Here we tested whether such modulation of EGFR was common among other RTK fusions, which collectively are found in [~]5% of all cancers. Using live- and fixed-cell microscopy in isogenic and patient-derived cell lines, we found that a wide variety of RTK fusions suppress transmembrane EGFR and sequester essential adaptor proteins in the cytoplasm, as evidenced by the localization of endogenous Grb2. Targeted therapies rapidly released Grb2 from sequestration and potentiated EGFR. Synthetic optogenetic analogs of RTK fusions confirmed that cytoplasmic sequestration of Grb2 was sufficient to suppress perception of extracellular EGF and could do so without driving signaling from the synthetic fusion itself, demonstrating that fusion signaling and suppression of EGFR could be functionally decoupled. Our study uncovers that a large number of RTK fusions simultaneously act as both activators and suppressors of signaling, the mechanisms of which could be exploited for new biomimetic therapies that enhance cell killing and suppress drug tolerance.

cancer biology↗

Evolution and clinical impact of genetic epistasis within EGFR-mutant lung cancers

Introductory paragraph Introductory paragraph Main text Methods Author Contributions Author Information References The current understanding of tumorigenesis is largely centered on a monogenic driver oncogene model. This paradigm is incompatible with the prevailing clinical experience in most solid malignancies: monotherapy with a drug directed against an individual oncogenic driver typically results in incomplete clinical responses and eventual tumor progression1-7. By profiling the somatic genetic alterations present in over 2,000 cases of lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide8,9, we show that combinations of functional genetic alterations, i.e. genetic collectives dominate the landscape of ...

cancer biology↗