Biology subjects

Dileep, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Dileep, V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Identification of cis elements for spatio-temporal control of DNA replication

The temporal order of DNA replication (replication timing, RT) is highly coupled with genome architecture, but cis-elements regulating spatio-temporal control of replication have remained elusive. We performed an extensive series of CRISPR mediated deletions and inversions and high-resolution capture Hi-C of a pluripotency associated domain (DppA2/4) in mouse embryonic stem cells. Whereas CTCF mediated loops and chromatin domain boundaries were dispensable, deletion of three intra-domain prominent CTCF-independent 3D contact sites caused a domain-wide delay in RT, shift in sub-nuclear chromatin compartment and loss of transcriptional activity, These \"early replication control elements\" (ERCEs) display prominent chromatin features resembling enhancers/promoters and individual and pair-wise deletions of the ERCEs confirmed their partial redundancy and interdependency in controlling domain-wide RT and transcription. Our results demonstrate that discrete cis-regulatory elements mediate domain-wide RT, chromatin compartmentalization, and transcription, representing a major advance in dissecting the relationship between genome structure and function.\n\nHighlightsO_LIcis-elements (ERCEs) regulate large scale chromosome structure and function\nC_LIO_LIMultiple ERCEs cooperatively control domain-wide replication\nC_LIO_LIERCEs harbor prominent active chromatin features and form CTCF-independent loops\nC_LIO_LIERCEs enable genetic dissection of large-scale chromosome structure-function.\nC_LI

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Single-cell replication profiling reveals stochastic regulation of the mammalian replication-timing program.

In mammalian cells, distinct replication domains (RDs), corresponding to structural units of chromosomes called topologically-associating domains (TADs), replicate at different times during S-phase1-4. Further, early/late replication of RDs corresponds to active/inactive chromatin interaction compartments5,6. Although replication origins are selected stochastically, such that each cell is using a different cohort of origins to replicate their genomes7-12, replication-timing is regulated independently and upstream of origin selection13 and evidence suggests that replication timing is conserved in consecutive cell cycles14. Hence, quantifying the extent of cell-to-cell variation in replication timing is central to studies of chromosome structure and function. Here we devise a strategy to measure variation in single-cell replication timing using DNA copy number. We find that borders between replicated and un-replicated DNA are highly conserved between cells, demarcating active and inactive compartments of the nucleus. Nonetheless, measurable variation was evident. Surprisingly, we detected a similar degree of variation in replication timing from cell-to-cell, between homologues within cells, and between all domains genome-wide regardless of their replication timing. These results demonstrate that stochastic variation in replication timing is independent of elements that dictate timing or extrinsic environmental variation.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

An Integrative Framework For Detecting Structural Variations In Cancer Genomes

Structural variants can contribute to oncogenesis through a variety of mechanisms, yet, despite their importance, the identification of structural variants in cancer genomes remains challenging. Here, we present an integrative framework for comprehensively identifying structural variation in cancer genomes. For the first time, we apply next-generation optical mapping, high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), and whole genome sequencing to systematically detect SVs in a variety of cancer cells.\n\nUsing this approach, we identify and characterize structural variants in up to 29 commonly used normal and cancer cell lines. We find that each method has unique strengths in identifying different classes of structural variants and at different scales, suggesting that integrative approaches are likely the only way to comprehensively identify structural variants in the genome. Studying the impact of the structural variants in cancer cell lines, we identify widespread structural variation events affecting the functions of non-coding sequences in the genome, including the deletion of distal regulatory sequences, alteration of DNA replication timing, and the creation of novel 3D chromatin structural domains.\n\nThese results underscore the importance of comprehensive structural variant identification and indicate that non-coding structural variation may be an underappreciated mutational process in cancer genomes.

genomics↗