Bumblebees flexibly adjust learning and decision strategies to sensory information content in a foraging task
When making decisions, humans and animals often rely on multiple sensory cues simultaneously. These provide complementary sources of information, which can help overcome ambiguity and noise, and increase the accuracy of decisions. While most studies have focused on the benefits of multimodal and within-mode integration for learning and decision making, their costs have received less attention. Processing, learning and memorizing multiple inputs requires more neural resources than for single cues, and might also require more time. In this study, we tested whether insects trade off the costs and benefits of learning multiple cues in a foraging task, using the buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris. To maximize comparability between cues, we presented combinations of visual-only features, as found on natural flowers: colours of varying discriminability, paired with shapes or patterns. We found that the bees relied exclusively on colours when these were easy to discriminate, and did not learn pattern or shape features presented simultaneously. With harder to discriminate colours, the bees learned both colour and shape or pattern features. Our results demonstrate that bumblebees flexibly adjust their learning strategies when presented with visual features of varying discriminability, to balance the costs and benefits of multi-cue learning. Our analysis of the learning rates of the bees with multi- and single attribute stimuli suggests that blocking could serve as a mechanism to implement this strategy switch. These results shed light on trade-offs in learning and decision making with multiple cues, and can directly be compared to studies in other insects, animals and humans. Significance StatementWhen making decisions, animals often rely on multiple sensory cues simultaneously. These complementary sources of information can increase decision accuracy. Unlike the benefits of cue integration, their costs have received less attention. In this study, we tested whether insects trade off the costs and benefits of learning multiple cues in a foraging task. We trained buff-tailed bumblebees, Bombus terrestris, to feature combinations of natural flowers. Bees flexibly switched from linear integration to winner-takes-all decision strategies depending on the sensory information available, thereby balancing accuracy and time investment in the task. We find that this switch can be explained by the cognitive phenomenon of blocking; providing the ground for future investigations into the underlying neural mechanisms of flexible decision strategies.