Biology subjects

Di Florio, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Di Florio, A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Developmental profile of psychiatric risk associated with voltage-gated cation channel activity

BackgroundRecent breakthroughs in psychiatric genetics have implicated biological pathways onto which genetic risk for psychiatric disorders converges. However, these studies do not reveal the developmental time point(s) at which these pathways are relevant. MethodsWe aimed to determine the relationship between psychiatric risk and developmental gene expression relating to discrete biological pathways. We used post-mortem RNA sequencing data (BrainSeq and BrainSpan) from brain tissue at multiple pre- and post-natal timepoints and summary statistics from recent genome-wide association studies of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. We prioritised gene sets for overall enrichment of association with each disorder, and then tested the relationship between the association of each of their constituent genes with their relative expression at each developmental stage. ResultsWe observed relationships between the expression of genes involved in voltage-gated cation channel activity during Early Midfetal, Adolescence and Early Adulthood timepoints and association with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, such that genes more strongly associated with these disorders had relatively low expression during Early Midfetal development and higher expression during Adolescence and Early Adulthood. The relationship with schizophrenia was strongest for the subset of genes related to calcium channel activity, whilst for bipolar disorder the relationship was distributed between calcium and potassium channel activity genes. ConclusionsOur results indicate periods during development when biological pathways related to the activity of calcium and potassium channels may be most vulnerable to the effects of genetic variants conferring risk to psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, they indicate key time points and potential targets for disorder-specific therapeutic interventions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Genetic association of FMRP targets with psychiatric disorders

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWGenes encoding the mRNA targets of Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) are enriched for genetic association with psychiatric disorders. However, many FMRP targets possess functions that are themselves genetically associated with psychiatric disorders, including synaptic transmission and plasticity, making it unclear whether the genetic risk is truly related to binding by FMRP or is alternatively mediated by the sampling of genes better characterised by another trait or functional annotation. Using published common variant, rare coding variant and copy number variant data, we examined the relationship between FMRP binding and genetic association with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. We then explored the partitioning of genetic association between overrepresented functional categories. High-confidence targets of FMRP were enriched for common schizophrenia risk alleles, as well as rare loss-of-function and de novo nonsynonymous variants in cases. Similarly, through common variation, FMRP targets were associated with major depressive disorder, and we present novel evidence of association with bipolar disorder. These relationships could not be explained by membership of other functional annotations known to be associated with psychiatric disorders, including those related to synaptic structure and function. This study reinforces the evidence that targeting by FMRP captures a subpopulation of genes enriched for genetic association with a range of psychiatric disorders, across traditional diagnostic boundaries.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Differences in Genetic Liability for Insomnia and Hypersomnia in Bipolar Disorder Subtypes

BackgroundInsomnia and hypersomnia are common in bipolar disorder (BD) but it is unclear whether genetic factors influence this association. Stratifying by bipolar subtypes could elucidate the nature of this association and inform research on sleep and BD. We therefore aimed to determine whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) for insomnia, daytime sleepiness and sleep duration differ according to bipolar subtypes (bipolar I disorder, BD-I or bipolar II disorder, BD-II).\n\nMethodsIn this case-control study, we used multinomial regression to determine whether PRS for insomnia, daytime sleepiness, and sleep duration were associated with risk of BD-I or BD-II when compared to each other and to controls. Cases (n=4672) were recruited within the United Kingdom from the Bipolar Disorder Research Network. Controls (n=5714) were recruited from the 1958 British Birth Cohort and UK Blood Service. All participants were of European ancestry. Clinical subtypes of BD were determined by semi-structured psychiatric interview (the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry) and case notes.\n\nResultsWithin cases, 3404 and 1268 met DSM-IV criteria for BD-I and BD-II, respectively. Insomnia PRS was associated with increased risk of BD-II (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.07-1.21, P = 8.26 x 10-5) but not BD-I (RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.94-1.03, P = .409) relative to controls. In contrast, sleep duration PRS was associated with increased relative risk of BD-I (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06-1.15, P = 1.13 x 10-5), but not BD-II (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.93-1.06, P = .818). Daytime sleepiness PRS was associated with an increased risk of BD-I (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11, P = .005) and BD-II (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.07-1.22, P = 3.22 x 10-5) compared to controls, but did not distinguish subtypes from each other.\n\nConclusionsBipolar subtypes differ in genetic liability to insomnia and sleep duration. Our findings provide further evidence that the distinction between BD-I and BD-II has biological and genetic validity. This distinction will be critical in the selection of participants for future research on the role of sleep disturbance in BD.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Dynamic expression of risk genes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder across development

AO_SCPCAPBSTRACTC_SCPCAPCommon genetic variation contributes a substantial proportion of risk for both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Furthermore, there is evidence of significant, but not complete, overlap in genetic risk between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. It has been hypothesised that genetic variants conferring risk for these disorders do so by influencing brain development, leading to the later emergence of symptoms. The comparative profile of risk gene expression for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder across development over different brain regions however remains unclear. Using genotypes derived from genome wide associations studies of the largest available cohorts of patients and control subjects, we investigated whether genes enriched for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder association show a bias for expression across any of 13 developmental stages in prefrontal cortical and subcortical brain regions. We show that genes associated with schizophrenia have a strong bias towards increased expression in the prefrontal cortex during early midfetal development and early infancy, and decreased expression during late childhood which normalises in adolescence. Risk-associated genes for bipolar disorder shared this postnatal expression profile but did not exhibit a bias towards expression at any prenatal stage. These results emphasise the dynamic expression of genes harbouring risk for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder across prefrontal cortex development and support the view that prenatal neurodevelopmental events are more strongly associated with schizophrenia than bipolar disorder.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Psychosis and the level of mood incongruence in Bipolar Disorder are related to genetic liability for Schizophrenia

ImportanceBipolar disorder (BD) overlaps schizophrenia in its clinical presentation and genetic liability. Alternative approaches to patient stratification beyond current diagnostic categories are needed to understand the underlying disease processes/mechanisms.\n\nObjectivesTo investigate the relationship between common-variant liability for schizophrenia, indexed by polygenic risk scores (PRS) and psychotic presentations of BD, using clinical descriptions which consider both occurrence and level of mood-incongruent psychotic features.\n\nDesignCase-control design: using multinomial logistic regression, to estimate differential associations of PRS across categories of cases and controls.\n\nSettings & Participants4399 BDcases, mean [sd] age-at-interview 46[12] years, of which 2966 were woman (67%) from the BD Research Network (BDRN) were included in the final analyses, with data for 4976 schizophrenia cases and 9012 controls from the Type-1 diabetes genetics consortium and Generation Scotland included for comparison.\n\nExposureStandardised PRS, calculated using alleles with an association p-value threshold < 0.05 in the second Psychiatric Genomics Consortium genome-wide association study of schizophrenia, adjusted for the first 10 population principal components and genotyping-platform.\n\nMain outcome measureMultinomial logit models estimated PRS associations with BD stratified by (1) Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) BD subtypes (2) Lifetime occurrence of psychosis.(3) Lifetime mood-incongruent psychotic features and (4) ordinal logistic regression examined PRS associations across levels of mood-incongruence. Ratings were derived from the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry interview (SCAN) and the Bipolar Affective Disorder Dimension Scale (BADDS).\n\nResultsAcross clinical phenotypes, there was an exposure-response gradient with the strongest PRS association for schizophrenia (RR=1.94, (95% C.1.1.86, 2.01)), then schizoaffective BD (RR=1.37, (95% C.I. 1.22, 1.54)), BD I (RR= 1.30, (95% C.I. 1.24, 1.36)) and BD II (RR=1.04, (95% C.1. 0.97, 1.11)). Within BD cases, there was an effect gradient, indexed by the nature of psychosis, with prominent mood-incongruent psychotic features having the strongest association (RR=1.46, (95% C.1.1.36, 1.57)), followed by mood-congruent psychosis (RR= 1.24, (95% C.1. 1.17, 1.33)) and lastly, BD cases with no history of psychosis (RR= 1.09, (95% C.1. 1.04, 1.15)).\n\nConclusionWe show for the first time a polygenic-risk gradient, across schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, indexed by the occurrence and level of mood-incongruent psychotic symptoms.

genetics↗