Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Dhinojwala, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Dhinojwala, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The same but different: setal arrays of anoles and geckos indicate alternative approaches to achieving similar adhesive effectiveness

The functional morphology of squamate fibrillar adhesive systems has been extensively investigated and has indirectly and directly influenced the design of synthetic counterparts. Not surprisingly, the structure and geometry of exemplar fibrils (setae) have been the subject of the bulk of the attention in such research, although variation in setal morphology along the length of subdigital adhesive pads has been implicated in the effective functioning of these systems. Adhesive setal field configuration has been described for several geckos, but that of the convergent Anolis lizards, comprised of morphologically simpler fibrils, remains largely unexplored. Here we examine setal morphology along the proximodistal axis of the digits of Anolis equestris and compare our findings to those for a model gecko, Gekko gecko. Consistent with previous work, we found that the setae of A. equestris are generally thinner, shorter, and present at higher densities than those of G. gecko and terminate in a single spatulate tip. Contrastingly, the setae of G. gecko are hierarchically branched in structure and carry hundreds of spatulate tips. Although the splitting of contacts into multiple smaller tips is predicted to increase the adhesive performance of a fiber compared to an unbranched one, we posited that the adhesive performance of G. gecko and A. equestris would be relatively similar when the configuration of the setal fields of each was accounted for. We found that, as in geckos, setal morphology of A. equestris follows a predictable pattern along the proximodistal axis of the pad, although there are several critical differences in the configuration of the setal fields of these two groups. Most notably, the pattern of variation in setal length of A. equestris is effectively opposite to that exhibited by G. gecko. This difference in clinal variation mirrors the difference in the direction in which the setal fields of anoles and geckos are peeled from the substrate, consistent with the hypothesis that biomechanical factors are the chief determinants of these patterns of variation. Future empirical work, however, is needed to validate this. Our findings introduce Anolis lizards as an additional source of inspiration for bio-inspired design and set the stage for comparative studies investigating the functional morphology of these convergent adhesive apparatuses. Such investigations will lead to an enhanced understanding of the interactions between form, function, and environment of fibril-based biological adhesive systems.

zoology

Spider viscid silk sticks better to superhydrophobic surfaces

In a likely coevolutionary arms race, insects evolved a variety of counter strategies to avoid capture by spider webs, while spiders evolved innovations web structure and especially their adhesive silks. For instance, insects cuticles employ a variety of potential anti-adhesion mechanisms such as the detachable scales of moths and surface waxes and superhydrophobic structures that might resist spreading of glues. In contrast, the viscid capture threads of most spider orb webs are covered with aggregate glue droplets that absorb atmospheric water, tuning glue viscosity to balance the competing demands of surface spreading versus maintaining strong bulk cohesion. Here, we test the hypothesis that superhydrophobicity in insects acts as an anti-adhesion defense against spider silk. We used lotus leaves as a model substrate because its superhydrophobicity outperforms most known insect surfaces. The adhesion of spider capture silk from the web of Larinioides cornutus was studied against three substrates: raw lotus leaves, oxygen plasma treated lotus leaves (hydrophilic lotus), and smooth glass, differing in roughness and chemistry. We found that spider capture silk sticks better to the superhydrophobic lotus than to other surfaces. Both chemistry and physical properties of the leaves contribute to higher adhesion, as raw lotus showed a mean increase in adhesion of 74 % compared to glass, while the similar surface roughness of the hydrophilic lotus increased adhesion by 64 % compared to glass. Thus, evolving a hydrophobic cuticle is unlikely to be a defensive trait used to mitigate the effectiveness of spider webs.

evolutionary biology