Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Devilliers, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Devilliers, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A Fatty Acid Anabolic Pathway in Specialized-Cells Remotely Controls Oocyte Activation in Drosophila

Pheromone-mediated partner recognition is crucial for maintenance of animal species. Here, we discover a metabolic link between pheromone and gamete physiology. In female genital tract, oocyte maturation is arrested at a specific meiotic-phase. Release of this arrest, called oocyte-activation, is triggered by a species-dependent signal. We show in Drosophila melanogaster that oenocytes, which produce the fatty acids (FAs) used as precursors of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), including pheromones, are also essential for oocyte activation. We identified a set of FA-anabolic enzymes required within oenocytes for the synthesis of a particular FA that is not a CHC precursor but controls oocyte activation. Our study thus reveals that two tightly linked FA-anabolic pathways act in parallel, one to produce sexual pheromones, the other to initiate embryonic development. Given that pheromone-deficient Drosophila melanogaster females are highly attractive for males irrespective of their species, this oenocyte function might have evolved to prevent hybrid development.

physiology↗

Differential Metabolic Sensitivity of mTORC1- and mTORC2-Dependent Overgrowth

The glycolytic/lipogenic axis promotes the synthesis of energetic molecules and building blocks necessary to support cell growth, although the absolute requirement of this metabolic axis must be deeply investigated. Here, we used Drosophila genetics and focus on the mTOR signaling network that controls cell growth and homeostasis. mTOR is present in two distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2. The former directly responds to amino acids and energetic levels, whereas the latter is required to sustain the signaling response downstream of insulin-like-peptide (Ilp) stimulation. Either signaling branch can be independently modulated in most Drosophila tissues. We confirm this independency in the fat tissue. We show that ubiquitous over-activation of mTORC1 or Ilp signaling affects carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, supporting the use of Drosophila as a powerful model to study the link between growth and metabolism. We show that cell-autonomous restriction of glycolysis or lipogenesis in fat cells impedes overgrowth dependent on Ilp-but not mTORC1-signaling. Additionally, ubiquitous deficiency of lipogenesis (FASN mutants) results in a drop in mTORC1 but not Ilp signaling, whereas, at the cell-autonomous level, lipogenesis deficiency affects none of these signals in fat cells. These findings thus, reveal differential metabolic sensitivity of mTORC1- and Ilp-dependent overgrowth. Furthermore, they suggest that local metabolic defects may elicit compensatory pathways between neighboring cells, whereas enzyme knockdown in the whole organism results in animal death. Importantly, our study weakens the use of single inhibitors to fight mTOR-related diseases and strengthens the use of drug combination and selective tissue-targeting.

cell biology↗

The Relationship Between Cancer Progression And Social Environment In Drosophila

The influence of oncogenic phenomena on the ecology and evolution of animal species is fast becoming an important research topic. Similar to host-pathogen interactions, cancer negatively affects host fitness, which should lead to the selection of host control mechanisms, including behavioral traits that best minimize the proliferation of malignant cells. Social behavior is one such trait, which is suggested to influence cancer progression. While the ecological benefits of sociality in gregarious species are widely acknowledged, only limited data are available on the role of the social environment on cancer progression. Here, we exposed adult Drosophila, with colorectal-like tumors, to different social environments. First, we show that cancerous flies kept in complete isolation exhibit increased tumor progression. Yet, more surprisingly, we find that cancerous flies, kept in groups with other noncancerous individuals, also develop tumors at a faster rate compared to those kept with other cancerous conspecifics, suggesting a strong impact of social group composition on cancer growth. Finally, we show that flies can discriminate between individuals at different stages of tumor growth and selectively choose their social environment accordingly. Control flies actively avoid flies with cancer but only at the later stages of tumor development, whereas cancerous flies display strong social interactions with cancerous flies in the early stages of tumor growth. Our study demonstrates the reciprocal links between cancer and social interactions, as well as highlighting how sociality impacts health and fitness in animals and its potential implications for disease ecology and ecosystem dynamics.

animal behavior and cognition↗