Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Derycke, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Derycke, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

An accessible metagenomic strategy allows for better characterization of invertebrate bulk samples

DNA-based techniques are a popular approach for assessing biodiversity in ecological research, especially for organisms which are difficult to detect or identify morphologically. Metabarcoding, the most established method for determining species composition and relative abundance in bulk samples, can be more sensitive and time- and cost effective than traditional morphological approaches. However, one drawback of this method is PCR bias caused by between-species variation in the amplification efficiency of a marker gene. Metagenomics, bypassing PCR amplification, has been proposed as an alternative to overcome this bias. Several studies have already shown the promising potential of metagenomics, but they all indicate the unavailability of reference genomes for most species in any ecosystem as one of the primary bottlenecks preventing its wider implementation. In this study, we present a strategy that uses unassembled reads of low-coverage whole genome sequencing to construct a genomic reference database, thus circumventing high sequencing costs and intensive bioinformatic processing. We show that this approach is superior to metabarcoding for approximating relative biomass of macrobenthos species from bulk samples. Furthermore, these results can be obtained with a sequencing effort comparable to metabarcoding. The strategy presented here can thus accelerate the implementation of metagenomics in biodiversity assessments, as it should be relatively easy to adopt by laboratories familiar with metabarcoding and can be used as an accessible alternative.

ecology↗

The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridize in Ophthalmotilapia.

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCichlid radiations often harbour closely related species with overlapping niches and distribution ranges. Such species sometimes hybridise in nature, which raises the question how can they coexist. This also holds for the Tanganyika mouthbrooders Ophthalmotilapia ventralis and O. nasuta. Earlier studies found indications of asymmetrical hybridisation with females of O. ventralis accepting males of O. nasuta, but not the other way around. We hypothesised that this was due to differences in the capacity for species recognition. Given the higher propensity of O. ventralis females towards hybridisation, we expect a reduced ability for species recognition in O. ventralis females, compared to O. nasuta females. We staged two experiments, one focusing on 22 female O. nasuta and one on 21 female O. ventralis. These fish were placed in one half of a tank and briefly exposed to a conspecific or a heterospecific male, a conspecific female, or nothing (control). Female response was evaluated by scoring six tracking parameters and by noting the occurrence of ten discrete behaviours before and during the encounter. Females always responded to the presence of another fish by approaching it. Remarkably, for both O. nasuta and O. ventralis, we did not find a different response between encounters with conspecific males and females. However, in agreement with our hypothesis, O. nasuta females behaved differently towards conspecific or heterospecific males, whereas O. ventralis females did not. When presented with a heterospecific male, O. nasuta females performed a lower number of ram behaviours. Additionally, they never displayed the flee behaviour, a component of the species mating repertoire that was seen in all but one of the presentations with a conspecific male. Our findings show that differences in species recognition at first encounter predict to a large degree the outcome of the mating process, even in the absence of mating behaviour.

animal behavior and cognition↗