Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Demidova, E. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Demidova, E. V..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Co-occurring mutations in the POLE exonuclease and non-exonuclease domains define a unique subset of highly mutagenic tumors.

Somatic POLE mutations in the exonuclease domain (ExoD) are prevalent in colorectal cancer (CRC), endometrial cancer (EC), and others and typically lead to dramatically increased tumor mutation burden (TMB). To understand whether non-ExoD mutations also play a role in mutagenesis, we assessed TMB in 447/14541 POLE-mutated CRCs, ECs, and ovarian cancers (OC) based on classification TMB-High (TMB-H) or TMB-Low (TMB-L). TMB-H tumors were segregated as POLE ExoD driver, POLE ExoD driver plus POLE Variant, and POLE Variant TMB-H. Intriguingly, TMB was highest in tumors bearing POLE ExoD driver plus POLE Variant (p<0.001 in CRC and EC, p<0.05 in OC). Integrated analysis of AlphaFold2-modeled POLE models and quantitative estimate of stability indicated that multiple variants had significant impact on functionality. These data indicate that co-occurring POLE variants categorize a unique subset of POLE-driven tumors defined by ultra-high TMB, which has implications for abundance of tumor neoantigens, therapeutic response, and patient outcomes. SignificanceSomatic POLE ExoD driver mutations cause proofreading deficiency that induces high tumor mutation burden (TMB). This study defines a novel modifier role for non-ExoD mutations in POLE ExoD-driven tumors, associated with ultra-high TMB. These data may inform acquisition of tumor neoantigens, tumor classification, therapeutic response, and patient outcomes.

cancer biology↗

Prevalence of pathogenic variants in DNA damage response genes in patients undergoing cancer risk assessment and reporting a personal history of early-onset renal cancer

PurposePathogenic variants (PVs) in a number of genes are known to increase the risk of hereditary renal cancer (hRC). However, many early-onset RC (eoRC) patients undergoing genetic testing lack PVs in hRC genes; thus, their genetic risk remains undefined. To determine if PVs in DNA damage response (DDR) genes are enriched in a convenience sample of eoRC patients undergoing genetic testing. Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of results for 844 unselected eoRC patients, undergoing genetic testing with a multi-gene cancer panel by Ambry Genetics [between July 2012 and December 2016]. The patients were tested with CancerNext and/or CancerNext Expanded panels for a variety of indications. Identified PVs were compared with patient characteristics. ResultsMean age of RC diagnosis was 48 years [range 24-60]. In addition to eoRC, 57.9% patients tested reported at least one additional cancer; breast cancer being the most common (40.1% of females, 2.5% of males). PVs in cancer risk genes were identified in 12.8% of patients--3.7% in RC-specific genes, and 8.55% in DDR genes. DDR gene PVs were most commonly identified in CHEK2, BRCA1/2, and ATM. Among the 2.1% of patients with a BRCA1/2 PV, <50% reported a personal history of hereditary breast/ovarian-associated cancer. No association between age of RC diagnosis, and prevalence of PVs in RC-specific or DDR genes was observed. ConclusionsMulti-gene panel testing including DDR genes may provide a more comprehensive risk assessment in unselected eoRC patients, and their families. Validation in larger datasets is needed to characterize the association with eoRC.

genetics↗