Biology subjects

DelRosso, N.

Publications and source records attributed to DelRosso, N..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

High-throughput affinity measurements of direct interactions between activation domains and co-activators

Sequence-specific activation by transcription factors is essential for gene regulation1,2. Key to this are activation domains, which often fall within disordered regions of transcription factors3,4 and recruit co-activators to initiate transcription5. These interactions are difficult to characterize via most experimental techniques because they are typically weak and transient6,7. Consequently, we know very little about whether these interactions are promiscuous or specific, the mechanisms of binding, and how these interactions tune the strength of gene activation. To address these questions, we developed a microfluidic platform for expression and purification of hundreds of activation domains in parallel followed by direct measurement of co-activator binding affinities (STAMMPPING, for Simultaneous Trapping of Affinity Measurements via a Microfluidic Protein-Protein INteraction Generator). By applying STAMMPPING to quantify direct interactions between eight co-activators and 204 human activation domains (>1,500 Kds), we provide the first quantitative map of these interactions and reveal 334 novel binding pairs. We find that the metazoan-specific co-activator P300 directly binds >100 activation domains, potentially explaining its widespread recruitment across the genome to influence transcriptional activation. Despite sharing similar molecular properties (e.g. enrichment of negative and hydrophobic residues), activation domains utilize distinct biophysical properties to recruit certain co-activator domains. Co-activator domain affinity and occupancy are well-predicted by analytical models that account for multivalency, and in vitro affinities quantitatively predict activation in cells with an ultrasensitive response. Not only do our results demonstrate the ability to measure affinities between even weak protein-protein interactions in high throughput, but they also provide a necessary resource of over 1,500 activation domain/co-activator affinities which lays the foundation for understanding the molecular basis of transcriptional activation.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2023

High-throughput thermodynamic and kinetic measurements of transcription factor/DNA mutations reveal how conformational heterogeneity can shape motif selectivity

Transcription factors (TFs) bind DNA sequences with a range of affinities, yet the mechanisms determining energetic differences between high- and low-affinity sequences ( selectivity) remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated two basic helix-loop-helix TFs, MAX (H. sapiens) and Pho4 (S. cerevisiae), that bind the same high-affinity sequence with highly similar nucleotide-contacting residues and bound structures but are differentially selective for non-cognate sequences. By measuring >1700 Kds and >500 rate constants for Pho4 and MAX mutant libraries binding multiple DNA sequences and comparing these measurements with thermodynamic and kinetic models, we identify the biophysical mechanisms by which changes to TF sequence alter both bound and unbound conformational ensembles to shape specificity landscapes. These results highlight the importance of conformational heterogeneity in determining sequence specificity and selectivity and can guide future efforts to engineer nucleic acid-binding proteins with enhanced selectivity.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2023

Development of compact transcriptional effectors using high-throughput measurements in diverse contexts

Human nuclear proteins contain >1000 transcriptional effector domains that can activate or repress transcription of target genes. We lack a systematic understanding of which effector domains regulate transcription robustly across genomic, cell-type, and DNA-binding domain (DBD) contexts. Here, we developed dCas9-mediated high-throughput recruitment (HT-recruit), a pooled screening method for quantifying effector function at endogenous targets, and tested effector function for a library containing 5092 nuclear protein Pfam domains across varied contexts. We find many effectors depend on target and DBD contexts, such as HLH domains that can act as either activators or repressors. We then confirm these findings and further map context dependencies of effectors drawn from unannotated protein regions using a larger library containing 114,288 sequences tiling chromatin regulators and transcription factors. To enable efficient perturbations, we select effectors that are potent in diverse contexts, and engineer (1) improved ZNF705 KRAB CRISPRi tools to silence promoters and enhancers, and (2) a compact human activator combination NFZ for better CRISPRa and inducible circuit delivery. Together, this effector-by-context functional map reveals context-dependence across human effectors and guides effector selection for robustly manipulating transcription.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Large-scale mapping and systematic mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains

Human gene expression is regulated by over two thousand transcription factors and chromatin regulators1,2. Effector domains within these proteins can activate or repress transcription. However, for many of these regulators we do not know what type of transcriptional effector domains they contain, their location in the protein, their activation and repression strengths, and the amino acids that are necessary for their functions. Here, we systematically measure the transcriptional effector activity of >100,000 protein fragments (each 80 amino acids long) tiling across most chromatin regulators and transcription factors in human cells (2,047 proteins). By testing the effect they have when recruited at reporter genes, we annotate 307 new activation domains and 592 new repression domains, a [~]5-fold increase over the number of previously annotated effectors3,4. Complementary rational mutagenesis and deletion scans across all the effector domains reveal aromatic and/or leucine residues interspersed with acidic, proline, serine, and/or glutamine residues are necessary for activation domain activity. Additionally, the majority of repression domain sequences contain either sites for SUMOylation, short interaction motifs for recruiting co-repressors, or are structured binding domains for recruiting other repressive proteins. Surprisingly, we discover bifunctional domains that can both activate and repress and can dynamically split a cell population into high- and low-expression subpopulations. Our systematic annotation and characterization of transcriptional effector domains provides a rich resource for understanding the function of human transcription factors and chromatin regulators, engineering compact tools for controlling gene expression, and refining predictive computational models of effector domain function.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2020

High-throughput discovery and characterization of human transcriptional effectors

Thousands of proteins localize to the nucleus; however, it remains unclear which contain transcriptional effectors. Here, we develop HT-recruit - a pooled assay where protein libraries are recruited to a reporter, and their transcriptional effects are measured by sequencing. Using this approach, we measure gene silencing and activation for thousands of domains. We find a relationship between repressor function and evolutionary age for the KRAB domains, discover Homeodomain repressor strength is collinear with Hox genetic organization, and identify activities for several Domains of Unknown Function. Deep mutational scanning of the CRISPRi KRAB maps the co-repressor binding surface and identifies substitutions that improve stability/silencing. By tiling 238 proteins, we find repressors as short as 10 amino acids. Finally, we report new activator domains, including a divergent KRAB. Together, these results provide a resource of 600 human proteins containing effectors and demonstrate a scalable strategy for assigning functions to protein domains.

genetics↗