Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Deisseroth, C. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Deisseroth, C. A..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Transcriptomic data and biomedical literature synergize in finding pharmacologic gene regulators

Most disorders caused by a deficiency or excess of one gene product lack targeted therapies. Since these disorders can be modeled with a gene overexpression, knockout, or knockdown, drugs that oppose the transcriptomic effects of such perturbations may be promising therapeutic candidates. RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) studies can fuel this drug-prioritization, but their labels, written in plain language, must be annotated manually. Hence, we introduce Signature-based Networks from Automatically Curated Knockout, Knockdown, and Small-molecule Studies (SNACKKSS), which automatically curates gene-disruption and drug-treatment studies from the Gene Expression Omnibus and, in partnership with uniformly computed read count datasets, feeds the labels and RNA-Seq data directly into regulatory relationship predictions. Through cross-validation, we show that SNACKKSS predictions (specifically, from a variation called "SA4") make a unique contribution to finding protein-inhibiting compounds, even alongside existing predictors. We demonstrate the benefit of aggregating multiple predictive tools, and provide this powerful ensemble alongside SNACKKSS. Importantly, we advise researchers to test complex machine learning models on multiple devices, since the hardware architecture can affect their output. Nonetheless, the downstream predictive ability was striking, and our findings support the value of integrating automatically curated RNA-Seq signatures with literature- and co-expression-based predictors for drug-repurposing prioritization.

genomics↗

Literature-based predictions of treatments for genetic disease pathology

Identifying genetic modifiers of disease-causing genes can guide drug discovery for treatment of genetic disorders, but selecting promising drugs to test requires extensive and up-to-date knowledge of drug-gene and gene-gene relationships. To address this challenge, we present PARsing ModifiErS via Abstract aNnotations (PARMESAN), a computational tool that searches PubMed for information on these relationships, and assembles them into one knowledgebase. PARMESAN then hypothesizes on undiscovered drug-gene relationships, assigning an evidence-based score to each hypothesis. We compare PARMESANs drug-gene hypotheses to all of the drug-gene relationships displayed by DrugBank, and see a strong correlation between the prediction score and the predictive accuracy--such that predictions scoring above 10 are 11 times more likely to be correct than incorrect. This publicly available tool provides an automated way to prioritize drug screens to target the most-promising drugs to test, thereby saving time and resources in the development of therapeutics for genetic disorders.

bioinformatics↗

AMELIE 2 speeds up Mendelian diagnosis by matching patient phenotype & genotype to primary literature

The diagnosis of Mendelian disorders requires labor-intensive literature research. Trained clinicians can spend hours looking for the right publication/s supporting a single gene that best explains a patients disease. AMELIE (Automatic Mendelian Literature Evaluation) greatly accelerates this process. AMELIE parses all 29 million PubMed abstracts, downloads and further parses hundreds of thousands of full text articles in search of information supporting the causality and associated phenotypes of any published genetic variant. AMELIE then prioritizes patient candidate variants for their likelihood of explaining any patients given set of phenotypes. Diagnosis of singleton patients (without relatives exomes) is the most time-consuming scenario. AMELIE ranked the causative gene at the very top in 2/3 of 215 diagnosed singleton Mendelian patients. Evaluating only the top 11 AMELIE scored genes of 127 (median) candidate genes per patient results in rapid diagnosis for 90+% of cases. AMELIE-based evaluation of all cases is 3-19x more efficient than hand-curated database-based approaches. We replicate these results on a cohort of clinical cases from Stanford Childrens Health and the Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research. An analysis web portal with our most recent update, programmatic interface and code will be available at AMELIE.stanford.edu. A pilot run of the web portal has already served many thousands of job submissions from dozens of countries.

genetics↗

AVADA Enables Automated Genetic Variant Curation Directly from the Full Text Literature

PurposeThe primary literature on human genetic diseases includes descriptions of pathogenic variants that are essential for clinical diagnosis. Variant databases such as ClinVar and HGMD collect pathogenic variants by manual curation. We aimed to automatically construct a freely accessible database of pathogenic variants directly from full-text articles about genetic disease.\n\nMethodsAVADA (Automatically curated VAriant DAtabase) is a novel machine learning tool that uses natural language processing to automatically identify pathogenic variants and genes in full text of primary literature and converts them to genomic coordinates for rapid downstream use.\n\nResultsAVADA automatically curated almost 60% of pathogenic variants deposited in HGMD, a 4.4-fold improvement over the current state of the art in automated variant extraction. AVADA also contains more than 60,000 pathogenic variants that are in HGMD, but not in ClinVar. In a cohort of 245 diagnosed patients, AVADA correctly annotated 38 previously described diagnostic variants, compared to 43 using HGMD, 20 using ClinVar and only 13 (wholly subsumed by AVADA and ClinVars) using the best automated abstracts-only based approach.\n\nConclusionAVADA is the first machine learning tool that automatically curates a variants database directly from full text literature. AVADA is available upon publication at http://bejerano.stanford.edu/AVADA.

genetics↗

ClinPhen extracts and prioritizes patientphenotypes directly from medical records to accelerate genetic disease diagnosis

PurposeSevere genetic diseases affect 7 million births per year, worldwide. Diagnosing these diseases is necessary for optimal care, but it can involve the manual evaluation of hundreds of genetic variants per case, with many variants taking an hour to evaluate. Automatic gene-ranking approaches shorten this process by reporting which of the genes containing variants are most likely to be causing the patients symptoms. To use these tools, busy clinicians must manually encode patient phenotypes, which is a cumbersome and imprecise process. With 60 million patients expected to be sequenced in the next 7 years, a fast alternative to manual phenotype extraction from the clinical notes in patients medical records will become necessary.\n\nMethodsWe introduce ClinPhen: a fast, high-accuracy tool that automatically converts the clinical notes into a prioritized list of patient symptoms using HPO terms.\n\nResultsClinPhen shows superior accuracy to existing phenotype extractors, and when paired with a gene-ranking tool it significantly improve the latters performance.\n\nConclusionCompared to manual phenotype extraction, ClinPhen saves more than 5 hours per case in Mendelian diagnosis alone. Summing over millions of forthcoming cases whose medical notes await phenotype encoding, ClinPhen makes a substantial contribution towards ending all patients diagnostic odyssey.

genomics↗

Phrank measures phenotype sets similarity to greatly improve Mendelian diagnostic disease prioritization

PurposeExome sequencing and diagnosis is beginning to spread across the medical establishment. The most time-consuming part of genome based diagnosis is the manual step of matching the potentially long list of patient candidate genes to patient phenotypes to identify the causative disease.\n\nMethodsWe introduce Phrank (for phenotype ranking), an information-theory inspired method that utilizes a Bayesian Network to prioritize candidate diseases or genes, as a stand-alone module that can be run with any underlying knowledgebase and any variant filtering scheme.\n\nResultsPhrank outperforms existing methods at ranking the causative disease or gene when applied to 169 real patient exomes with Mendelian diagnoses. Phranks greatest improvement is in disease space, where across all 169 patients it ranks only 3 diseases on average ahead of the true diagnosis, whereas Phenomizer ranks 32 diseases ahead of the causal one.\n\nConclusionUsing Phrank to rank all patient candidate genes or diseases, as they start working through a new case, will save the busy clinician much time in deriving a genetic diagnosis.

genomics↗

AMELIE accelerates Mendelian patient diagnosis directly from the primary literature

The diagnosis of Mendelian disorders requires labor-intensive literature research. Our software system AMELIE (Automatic Mendelian Literature Evaluation) greatly automates this process. AMELIE parses hundreds of thousands of full text articles to find an underlying diagnosis to explain a patients phenotypes given the patients exome. AMELIE prioritizes patient candidate genes for their likelihood of causing the patients phenotypes. Diagnosis of singleton patients (without relatives exomes) is the most time-consuming scenario. AMELIEs gene ranking method was tested on 215 singleton Mendelian patients with a clinical diagnosis. AMELIE ranked the causal gene among the top 2 in the majority (63%) of cases. Examining AMELIEs top 10 genes, amounting to 8% of 124 candidate genes with rare functional variants per patient, results in diagnosis for 95% of cases. Strikingly, training only on gene pathogenicity knowledge from 2011 leads to identical performance compared to training on current data. An accompanying analysis web portal has launched at AMELIE.stanford.edu.

genetics↗