Biology subjects

Decock, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Decock, J..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Anti-tumor effects of a novel cell penetrating peptide-based therapeutic approach to target Lactate Dehydrogenase C (LDHC) in triple negative breast cancer.

BackgroundLactate Dehydrogenase C (LDHC) is a promising candidate for therapeutic targeting thanks to its highly tumor-specific expression, immunogenicity, and pro-tumorigenic functions. Aberrant LDHC expression is associated with poor clinical outcomes in multiple cancers, including breast cancer. However, no specific LDHC inhibitors are currently available, highlighting the need for novel strategies to selectively target LDHC in tumor cells. This study explores the anti-tumor potential of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) to target LDHC in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). MethodsFour CPPs were evaluated for their ability to deliver LDHC siRNA to tumor cells, including the positively charged 10R peptide (10R) and three bifunctional peptides containing the integrin v{beta}3 recognition motif Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD): 10R-RGD, cyclicRGD-10R (cRGD-10R), and internalizing RGD-10R (iRGD-10R). We characterized the physicochemical properties of all CPP:siRNA complexes, and determined their serum stability, cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and LDHC silencing efficiency in vitro. The anti-tumor effects and cytotoxicity of cRGD-10R:siRNA and iRGD-10R:siRNA complexes were further assessed in a TNBC xenograft zebrafish model. ResultsAll four CPPs formed stable nanocomplexes with favorable safety profiles. The 10R-RGD and cRGD-10R peptides demonstrated the most efficient LDHC knockdown, reduced the clonogenic ability of TNBC cells and enhanced their treatment response to the chemotherapeutic drug olaparib in vitro. Treatment of TNBC xenograft zebrafish with 10R-RGD:siRNA and cRGD-10R:siRNA complexes significantly reduced tumor burden without inducing major toxicity. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that CPP-based siRNA delivery provides a novel and safe approach to target LDHC, either as a monotherapy or in combination with common anti-cancer drugs, to enhance treatment outcomes.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Longitudinal cellular and humoral immune responses following Covid-19 BNT162b2-mRNA-based booster vaccination of craft and manual workers in Qatar.

IntroductionIn March 2020, the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 prompted global vaccination campaigns to mitigate COVID-19 disease severity and mortality. The 2-dose BNT162b2- mRNA vaccine effectively reduced infection and mortality rates, however, waning vaccine effectiveness necessitated the introduction of a third vaccine dose or booster. To assess the magnitude and longevity of booster-induced immunity, we conducted a longitudinal study of SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular and humoral immune responses among Qatars vulnerable craft and manual worker community. We also investigated the impact of prior naturally acquired immunity on booster vaccination efficacy. MethodsSeventy healthy participants were enrolled in the study, of whom half had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood samples were collected before and after booster vaccination to evaluate immune responses through SARS- CoV-2 specific ELISpots, IgG ELISA, neutralization assays, and flow cytometric immunophenotyping ResultsT cell analysis revealed increased Th1 cellular responses, marked by enhanced IFN-{gamma} release, in recently infected participants, which was further enhanced by booster vaccination for up to 6-months. Furthermore, booster vaccination stimulated cytotoxic T cell responses in infection-naive participants, characterized by granzyme B production. Both natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and booster vaccination induced robust and durable SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral immune responses, with high neutralizing antibody levels. Prior natural infection was also linked to an increased number of class- switched B cells prior to booster vaccination. ConclusionThese findings underscore the importance of booster vaccination in enhancing anti-viral immunity across both infection-naive and previously infected individuals, enhancing distinct arms of the anti-viral immune response and prolonging naturally acquired immunity.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2024

Immunomodulatory effects of tumor Lactate Dehydrogenase C (LDHC) in breast cancer

BackgroundImmunotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for cancer patients; however, its clinical benefits vary among patients and its effectiveness across breast cancer subtypes remains uncertain. To enhance its efficacy, it is important to gain more insight into tumor-intrinsic immunomodulatory factors that could be used as therapeutic targets. We previously identified Lactate Dehydrogenase C (LDHC) to be a promising anti-cancer target due to its role in regulating cancer cell genomic integrity. In this study, we investigated the effects of tumor LDHC expression on immune responses. MethodsTIMER AND TIDE deconvolution methods were used to investigate the relationship between tumor LDHC expression, immune cell infiltration and T cell dysfunction. Multiplex cytokine assays and flow cytometry analyses of breast cancer cell monocultures, and direct and indirect cancer cell-immune cell co-culture models were performed to assess the effect of LDHC knockdown on the secretion of inflammatory mediators and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. T cell activity was determined by IFN-{gamma} ELISPot assays and 7-AAD viability flow cytometry of cancer cells in direct co-culture. ResultsTIMER and TIDE analyses revealed that tumor LDHC expression is associated with T cell dysfunction in breast cancer and worse post-immunotherapy survival in melanoma. Depletion of LDHC in three breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-468, BT-549, HCC-1954) enhanced T cell activation and cytolytic function (4-hour direct co-culture). Analysis of cancer cell monocultures revealed an increase in secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-{gamma}, GM- CSF, MCP-1, CXCL1), a decrease in immunosuppressive factors (IL-6, Gal-9) and a reduction in tumor cell surface PD-L1 expression following LDHC knockdown. Using 72-hour direct co- cultures with LDHC-silenced cancer cells, we observed a decrease in tumor-promoting cytokines (IL-1{beta}, IL-4 and IL-6) and an increase in the tumor-inhibiting cytokine CXCL1. Furthermore, LDHC knockdown reduced the number of CD8+ T cells expressing PD-1 and CTLA-4, as well as the cell surface expression of CTLA-4, TIGIT, TIM3, and VISTA. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that targeting LDHC may improve anti-tumor immune responses by modulating the secretion of pro- and anti-tumorigenic cytokines and impairing immune checkpoint signaling. Further studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which LDHC modulates these responses in breast cancer.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Modulation of SLFN11 induces changes in DNA Damage response

BackgroundLack of Schlafen family member 11 (SLFN11) expression has been recently identified as a dominant genomic determinant of response to DNA damaging agents in numerous cancer types. Thus, strategies aimed at increasing SLFN11 could be used to restore chemosensitivity of refractory cancers. As oncogenic downregulation is often driven by methylation of the promotor region, we explore the demethylation effect of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (decitabine), on the SLFN11 gene methylation. Since SLFN11 has been reported as an interferon inducible gene, and interferon is secreted during an active anti-tumor immune response, we investigated the in vitro effect of IFN-{gamma} on SLFN11 expression in breast cancer cell lines. A second broader approach to show cross talk between immune cells and SLFN11 expression is indirect co-culture of breast cancer cells with activated PBMCs and evaluate if this can drive SLFN11 upregulation. Finally, as a definitive and specific way to modulate SLFN11 expression we implemented SLFN11 dCas9 (dead CRISPR associated protein 9) systems to specifically increase or decrease SLFN11 expression. ResultsWe first confirmed a correlation previously reported between methylation of SLFN11 promoter and its expression across multiple cell lines. We showed in-vitro that decitabine and IFN-{gamma} could increase moderately the expression of SLFN11 in both BT- 549 and T47D cell lines, but not in strongly methylated cell lines such as MDA-MB-231. Though, in-vitro, the co-culture of the same cell lines with CD8-CD25 activated PBMC failed to increase SLFN11 expression. On the one hand, the use of a CRISPR-dCas9 UNISAM system could increase SLFN11 expression significantly (up to 5-fold), stably and specifically in BT-549 and T47D cancer cell lines. Though, this system also failed to force a strong expression of SLFN11 in cell lines with robust SLFN11 promoter methylation such as MDA-MB-231. On the other hand, the use of CRISPR-dCas9 KRAB could significantly reduce the expression of SLFN11 in BT-549 and T47D. We then used the modified cell lines to confirm the alteration in chemo sensitivity of those cells to treatment with DNA Damaging Agents (DDAs) such as Cisplatin and Epirubicin or DNA Damage Response (DDRs) drugs like Olaparib. RNAseq was used to elucidate the mechanisms of action affected by the alteration in SLFN11 expression. ConclusionTo our knowledge this is the first report of the stable non-lethal increase of SLFN11 expression in a cancer cell line. Our results show that induction of SLFN11 expression can enhance DDA and DDR sensitivity in breast cancer cells and dCas9 systems may represent a novel approach to increase SLFN11 and achieve higher sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, improving outcome or decreasing required drug concentrations. SLFN11-targeting therapies might be explored pre-clinically to develop personalized approaches.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Targeting LDHC dysregulates the cell cycle and improves sensitivity to cisplatin and olaparib

The cancer testis antigen (CTA) lactate dehydrogenase C (LDHC) is a promising anti-cancer target with tumor-specific expression, immunogenicity and a role in metabolic reprogramming. Interrogation of the TCGA breast cancer cohort demonstrates upregulation of LDHC expression, conferring unfavorable prognosis. Although the role of LDHC is well characterized in spermatocytes, its role in tumors remains largely unknown. We investigated whether LDHC is involved in regulating genomic stability and may be targeted to affect tumor cellular fitness. Silencing LDHC in four breast cancer cell lines significantly increased the presence of giant cells and nuclear aberrations, DNA damage and apoptosis. LDHC silenced cells demonstrated aberrant cell cycle progression with differential expression of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA damage response regulators. In addition, LDHC silencing induced microtubule destabilization, culminating in increased mitotic catastrophe and reduced long-term survival. Notably, cisplatin and olaparib treatment further reduced survival of LDHC silenced cells. This study supports the therapeutic potential of targeting LDHC to mitigate cancer cell survival, and improve sensitivity to DNA damaging and DNA damage repair inhibiting agents.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Conditional activation of immune-related signatures and prognostic significance: a pan-cancer analysis

BackgroundIt is becoming clear that tumor immune T cell infiltration and its functional orientation have substantial effect on cancer progression, influencing both response to therapy and prognosis. In this pan-cancer study, the previously described Immunologic Constant of Rejection (ICR) signature is used to define opposing immune phenotypes (i.e., immuneactive and immune-silent) across 31 different histologies. We systematically analyze the interconnections between the genetic programming of neoplasms and their immune orientation across different histologies, and the prognostic impact of such interplay. Moreover, we investigated the predictive value of ICR classification across various public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. MethodsRNA-seq data of samples from a total of 9,282 patient tumor samples representing 31 cancer types were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We classified each cancer type based on the expression of the ICR gene signature. Oncogenic pathway gene set enrichment and mutational status were analyzed in relation to ICR phenotypes. To explore whether tumorintrinsic attributes associate with the prognostic value of ICR across cancers, we compared mutational load, oncogenic alterations and expression of oncogenic pathways between cancer types using an integrative bioinformatic pipeline. ResultsOur analyses identified a distinct prognostic connotation of ICR depending on cancer histology. We identified several oncogenic pathways whose enrichment inversely correlated with ICR in multiple tumor types. We found several cancer specific pathways that were differentially enriched between tumors in which ICR had a prognostic impact versus the ones in which ICR did not bear any prognostic connotation such as proliferation and TGF-beta signaling. Importantly, this conditional impact of ICR was also validated in the context of immune checkpoint inhibition treatment. ConclusionsWe identified tumor-intrinsic attributes that correlate with immune phenotypes and potentially influence their development. In addition, a relationship was observed between the enrichment of oncogenic pathways and the prognostic significance of the ICR and its predictive value for patients treated with anti-CTLA4 immune checkpoint inhibition. Such information can be used to prioritize potential candidates for therapies aimed at converting immune-silent into immuneactive tumors and to refine stratification algorithms.

cancer biology↗