Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dean, D. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Dean, D. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources
bioRxiv2024

A Water Relaxation Atlas for Age and Region specific Metabolite Concentration Correction

Metabolite concentration estimates from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) are typically quantified using water referencing, correcting for relaxation-time differences between metabolites and water. One common approach is to correct the water reference signal for differential relaxation within three tissue compartments (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) using fixed literature values. However, water relaxation times (T1 and T2) vary between brain locations, in pathology, and with age. MRS studies, even those measuring metabolite levels across the lifespan, often ignore these effects, because of a lack of reference data. The purpose of this study is to develop a water relaxometry atlas and to integrate location- and age-appropriate relaxation values into the MRS analysis workflow. 101 volunteers (51 men, 50 women; [~]10 male and 10 female participants per decade (from the 20s to 60s), were recruited. T1-weighted MPRAGE images ((1-mm)3 isotropic resolution) were acquired. Whole-brain water T1 and T2 measurements were made with DESPOT ((1.4 mm)3 isotropic resolution). T1 and T2 maps were registered to the JHU MNI-SS/EVE atlas using affine and LDDMM transformation. The atlass 268 parcels were reduced to 130 by combining homologous parcels. Mean T1 and T2 values were calculated for each parcel in each subject. Linear models of T1 and T2 as functions of age were computed, using age - 30 as the predictor. Reference atlases of "age-30-intercept" and age-slope for T1 and T2 were generated. The atlas-based workflow was integrated into Osprey, which co-registers MRS voxels to the atlas and calculates location- and age-appropriate water relaxation parameters for quantification. The water relaxation aging atlas revealed significant regional and tissue differences in water relaxation behavior across adulthood. Using location- and subject-appropriate reference values in the MRS analysis workflow removes a current methodological limitation and is expected to reduce quantification biases associated with water-referenced tissue correction, especially for studies of aging.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2024

Comparison of test-retest reproducibility of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for water T1 and T2 mapping

PurposeRelaxometry, specifically T1 and T2 mapping, has become an essential technique for assessing the properties of biological tissues related to various physiological and pathological conditions. Many techniques are being used to estimate T1 and T2 relaxation times, ranging from the traditional inversion or saturation recovery and spin-echo sequences to more advanced methods. Choosing the appropriate method for a specific application is critical since the precision and accuracy of T1 and T2 measurements are influenced by a variety of factors including the pulse sequence and its parameters, the inherent properties of the tissue being examined, the MRI hardware, and the image reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the test-retest reproducibility of two advanced MRI relaxometry techniques (Driven Equilibrium Single Pulse Observation of T1 and T2, DESPOT, and 3D Quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition Sequence with a T2 preparation pulse, QALAS), for T1 and T2 mapping in a healthy volunteer cohort. Methods10 healthy volunteers underwent brain MRI at 1.3 mm3 isotropic resolution, acquiring DESPOT and QALAS data ([~]11.8 and [~]5 minutes duration, including field maps, respectively), test-retest with subject repositioning, on a 3.0 Tesla Philips Ingenia Elition scanner. To reconstruct the T1 and T2 maps, we used an equation-based algorithm for DESPOT and a dictionary-based algorithm that incorporates inversion efficiency and B1-field inhomogeneity for QALAS. The test-retest reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. ResultsOur results indicate that both the DESPOT and QALAS techniques demonstrate good levels of test-retest reproducibility for T1 and T2 mapping across the brain. Higher whole-brain voxel-to-voxel ICCs are observed in QALAS for T1 (0.84 {+/-} 0.039) and in DESPOT for T2 (0.897 {+/-} 0.029). The Bland-Altman plots show smaller bias and variability of T1 estimates for QALAS (mean of -0.02 s, and upper and lower limits of -0.14 and 0.11 s, 95% CI) than for DESPOT (mean of -0.02 s, and limits of -0.31 and 0.27 s). QALAS also showed less variability (mean 1.08 ms, limits -1.88 to 4.04 ms) for T2 compared to DESPOT (mean of 2.56 ms, and limits -17.29 to 22.41 ms). The within-subject CoVs for QALAS range from 0.6% (T2 in CSF) to 5.8% (T2 in GM), while for DESPOT they range from 2.1% (T2 in CSF) to 6.7% (T2 in GM). The between-subject CoVs for QALAS range from 2.5% (T2 in GM) to 12% (T2 in CSF), and for DESPOT they range from 3.7% (T2 in WM) to 9.3% (T2 in CSF). ConclusionOverall, QALAS demonstrated better reproducibility for T1 and T2 measurements than DESPOT, in addition to reduced acquisition time.

neuroscience↗