Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

De Villa, G. A. G.

Publications and source records attributed to De Villa, G. A. G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Biomechanical Hand Model to Quantify Finger Joint Kinematics Using a 3D Motion Capture System

The kinematics of rhythmic, speed-modulated finger and grasp-like movements were analyzed using a reduced biomechanical model of the hand and a marker-based optical motion-capture system. Twenty-one healthy participants performed eight hand motor tasks involving metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint flexion-extension (F-E) and carpometacarpal (CMC) thumb opposition-reposition (O-R) at two movement frequencies (0.50 and 0.75 Hz). Kinematic analysis quantified the range of movement (RoM), mean speed, and normalized total harmonic distortion (TDHN). Statistical analysis identified task type as the primary factor modulating all three metrics across digits, with large effect sizes [Formula]. Movement frequency significantly influenced mean speed [Formula] and moderately affected TDHN [Formula], while thumb RoM remained statistically unchanged across frequencies (p = 0.063). Participants consistently reproduced the intended sinusoidal trajectories, as indicated by low TDHN values (below 19%). The findings support the analysis of coordinated hand movements across various tasks under controlled time conditions. They also demonstrate that the simplified biomechanical model accurately captured both individual and co-ordinated finger movements. This provides a valuable reference for studies on motor control and for applications in rehabilitation and assistive technology.

bioengineering↗

Effects of additional load at different heights on gait initiation: a statistical parametric mapping of center of pressure and center of mass behavior

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different vertical positions of an asymmetrical load on the anticipatory postural adjustments phase of gait initiation. Sixty-eight college students (32 males, 36 females; age: 23.65 {+/-} 3.21 years old; weight: 69.98 {+/-} 8.15 kg; height: 1.74 {+/-} 0.08 m) were enrolled in the study. Ground reaction forces and moments were collected using two force platforms. The participants completed three trials under each of the following random conditions: no-load (NL), waist uniformly distributed load (WUD), shoulder uniformly distributed load (SUD), waist stance foot load (WST), shoulder stance foot load (SST), waist swing foot load (WSW), and shoulder swing foot load (SSW). The paired Hotellings T-square test was used to compare the experimental conditions. The center of pressure (COP) time series were significantly different for the SUD vs. NL, SST vs. NL, WST vs. NL, and WSW vs. NL comparisons. Significant differences in COP time series were observed for all comparisons between waist vs. shoulder conditions. Overall, these differences were greater when the load was positioned at the shoulders. For the center of mass (COM) time series, significant differences were found for the WUD vs. NL and WSW vs. NL conditions. However, no differences were observed with the load positioned at the shoulders. In conclusion, only asymmetrical loading at the waist produced significant differences, and the higher the extra load, the greater the effects on COP behavior. By contrast, only minor changes were observed in COM behavior, suggesting that the changes in COP (the controller) behavior are adjustments to maintain the COM (controlled object) unaltered.

bioengineering↗