Biology subjects

De Kegel, B.

Publications and source records attributed to De Kegel, B..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Paralog protein compensation preserves protein-protein interaction networks following gene loss in cancer

Proteins operate within dense interconnected networks, where interactions are necessary both for stabilising proteins and for enabling them to execute their molecular functions. Remarkably, protein-protein interaction networks operating within tumour cells continue to function despite widespread genetic perturbations. Previous work has demonstrated that tumour cells tolerate perturbations of paralogs better than perturbations of singleton genes, but the mechanisms behind this genetic robustness remains poorly understood. Here, we systematically profile the proteomic response of tumours and tumour cell lines to gene loss. We find many examples of active compensation, where deletion of one paralog results in increased abundance of another, and collateral loss, where deletion of one paralog results in reduced abundance of another. Compensation is enriched among sequence-similar paralog pairs that are central in the protein-protein interaction network and widely conserved across evolution. Compensation is also significantly more likely to be observed for gene pairs with a known synthetic lethal relationship. Our results support a model whereby loss of one gene results in increased protein abundance of its paralog, stabilising the protein-protein interaction network. Consequently, tumour cells may become dependent on the paralog for survival, creating potentially targetable vulnerabilities.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Paralog dispensability shapes homozygous deletion patterns in tumor genomes

Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer, resulting in tumor genomes having large numbers of genetic aberrations, including homozygous deletions of protein coding genes. That tumor cells remain viable in the presence of such gene loss suggests high robustness to genetic perturbation. In model organisms and cancer cell lines, paralogs have been shown to contribute substantially to genetic robustness - they are generally more dispensable for growth than singletons. Here, by analyzing copy number profiles of >10,000 tumors, we test the hypothesis that the increased dispensability of paralogs shapes tumor genome evolution. We find that genes with paralogs are more likely to be homozygously deleted and that this cannot be explained by other factors known to influence copy number variation. Furthermore, features that influence paralog dispensability in cancer cell lines correlate with paralog deletion frequency in tumors. Finally, paralogs that are broadly essential in cancer cell lines are less frequently deleted in tumors than non-essential paralogs. Overall our results suggest that homozygous deletions of paralogs are more frequently observed in tumor genomes because paralogs are more dispensable.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

KBoost: a new method to infer gene regulatory networks from gene expression data

Reconstructing gene regulatory networks is crucial to understand biological processes and holds potential for developing personalized treatment. Yet, it is still an open problem as state-of-the-art algorithms are often not able to process large amounts of data within reasonable time. Furthermore, many of the existing methods predict numerous false positives and have limited capabilities to integrate other sources of information, such as previously known interactions. Here we introduce KBoost, an algorithm that uses kernel PCA regression, boosting and Bayesian model averaging for fast and accurate reconstruction of gene regulatory networks. We have benchmarked KBoost against other high performing algorithms using three different datasets. The results show that our method compares favorably to other methods across datasets. We have also applied KBoost to a large cohort of close to 2000 breast cancer patients and 24000 genes in less than 2 hours on standard hardware. Our results show that molecularly defined breast cancer subtypes also feature differences in their GRNs. An implementation of KBoost in the form of an R package is available at: https://github.com/Luisiglm/KBoost.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

Comprehensive prediction of synthetic lethality between paralog pairs in cancer cell lines

Pairs of paralogs may share common functionality and hence display synthetic lethal interactions. As the majority of human genes have an identifiable paralog, exploiting synthetic lethality between paralogs may be a broadly applicable approach for targeting gene loss in cancer. However only a biased subset of human paralog pairs has been tested for synthetic lethality to date. Here, by analysing genome-wide CRISPR screens and molecular profiles of over 700 cancer cell lines, we identify features predictive of synthetic lethality between paralogs, including shared protein-protein interactions and evolutionary conservation. We develop a machine-learning classifier based on these features to predict which paralog pairs are most likely to be synthetic lethal and to explain why. We show that our classifier accurately predicts the results of combinatorial CRISPR screens in cancer cell lines and furthermore can distinguish pairs that are synthetic lethal in multiple cell lines from those that are cell-line specific.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Paralog buffering contributes to the variable essentiality of genes in cancer cell lines

What makes a gene essential for cellular survival? In model organisms, such as budding yeast, systematic gene deletion studies have revealed that paralog genes are less likely to be essential than singleton genes and that this can partially be attributed to the ability of paralogs to buffer each others loss. However, the essentiality of a gene is not a fixed property and can vary significantly across different genetic backgrounds. It is unclear to what extent paralogs contribute to this variation, as most studies have analyzed genes identified as essential in a single genetic background. Here, using gene essentiality profiles of 558 genetically heterogeneous tumor cell lines, we analyze the contribution of paralogy to variable essentiality. We find that, compared to singleton genes, paralogs are less frequently essential and that this is more evident when considering genes with multiple paralogs or with highly sequence similar paralogs. We determine that paralogs derived from whole genome duplication exhibit more variable essentiality than those derived from small-scale duplications. We estimate that in 13-17% of cases the variable essentiality of paralogs can be attributed to buffering relationships between paralog pairs, as evidenced by synthetic lethality. Paralog pairs derived from whole genome duplication and pairs that function in protein complexes are significantly more likely to display such synthetic lethal relationships. Overall we find that many of the observations made using a single strain of budding yeast can be extended to understand patterns of essentiality in genetically heterogeneous cancer cell lines.

genetics↗