Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

De Brito Van Velze, M.

Publications and source records attributed to De Brito Van Velze, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Feedforward circuits enable modality-specific control of cortical inhibition during behavioral state transitions.

Local inhibitory neurons (INs), specifically those involved in disinhibitory circuits like somatostatin (SST) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-positive INs, are essential for regulating cortical function during behavior. However, it is unclear the mechanisms by which these INs are recruited during active states and whether their activity is consistent across different sensory cortices. We now reveal that in mice, locomotor activity strongly recruits SST-INs in primary somatosensory (S1) but not visual (V1) cortex. This diverse engagement of SST-INs could not be explained by differences in VIP-IN function but was absent in the presence of visual sensory drive suggesting involvement of feedforward sensory pathways. In agreement, inactivating the somatosensory thalamus, but not decreasing VIP-INs activity, significantly reduces the recruitment of SST-INs in S1 by locomotion. Finally, model simulations suggest differences in SST-INs activity can be explained by varying ratios of VIP-driven inhibition and thalamus-driven cortical excitation. Our work suggests that by integrating feedforward activity with neuromodulation, SST-INs play a central role in adapting sensory processing to behavioral states.

neuroscience↗

An unconventional GABAergic circuit differently controls pyramidal neuron activity in two visual cortical areas via endocannabinoids

Perisomatic inhibition of neocortical pyramidal neurons (PNs) coordinates cortical network activity during sensory processing, and it has been mainly attributed to parvalbumin-expressing basket cells (BCs). However, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1)-expressing interneurons also inhibit the perisomatic region of PNs but the connectivity and function of these elusive - yet prominent - neocortical GABAergic cells is unknown. We found that the connectivity pattern of CB1-positive BCs strongly differs between primary and high-order cortical visual areas. Moreover, persistently active CB1 signaling suppresses GABA release from CB1 BCs in the medial secondary visual cortex (V2M), but not in the primary (V1) visual area. Accordingly, in vivo, tonic CB1 signaling is responsible for higher but less coordinated PN activity in V2M than in V1. Our results indicate a differential CB1-mediated mechanism controlling PN activity, and suggest an alternative connectivity schemes of a specific GABAergic circuit in different cortical areas

neuroscience↗