Biology subjects

Davies, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Davies, A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

MIND the gap: methodological considerations and guidance for structural MRI similarity network analysis with MIND

Structural similarity networks quantify the similarity of structural properties across cortical regions, providing a macroscopic window onto the organisation of cortical architecture. Morphometric inverse divergence (MIND) is a multivariate metric of similarity between cortical areas, based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between areal distributions of multiple MRI features or morphometric variables locally measured at voxel or vertex resolution. MIND has demonstrated technical robustness and biological validity and is increasingly widely used as a measure of cortico-cortical similarity in clinical and developmental network neuroscience. Here we provide in-depth methodological background on KL divergence and MIND, highlighting possible sources of bias, critical user decision points in the design of a MIND processing pipeline, and recommendations for technical risk mitigation in using MIND as a metric of cortical similarity. We use simulated data and observational MRI datasets from adults (UK Biobank, N = 500 T1-weighted and diffusion scans) and neonates (Developing Human Connectome Project, N = 752 T2-weighted scans), to show how the estimator of KL divergence implemented in MIND is potentially influenced or biased by five properties of input MRI feature maps: (i) their smoothness; (ii) the proportion of identical values; (iii) analysis in native or common space and the choice of vertex mesh resolution; (iv) parcellation choice; and (v) covariance between input features. We offer principled and practical guidance for investigators wanting to specify and implement the MIND processing pipeline that is best suited to the constraints and opportunities of the MRI data available to them. These recommendations outline which pipeline steps should be used sparingly, such as vertex map smoothing; which should be used with informed caution, such as parcellation choice or vertex mesh resampling; and which could be newly implemented for more robust estimation of MIND, such as the use of principal component analysis to preprocess multivariate MRI features. To support further development of structural MRI similarity network analysis, and wider adoption of robust MIND methods, we also publish the code used to generate the results in this paper as an open resource.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Cleft lip/palate and educational attainment: cause, consequence, or correlation? A Mendelian randomization study

ImportancePrevious studies have found that children born with a non-syndromic form of cleft lip and/or palate have lower-than-average educational attainment. These differences could be due to a genetic predisposition to low intelligence and academic performance, factors arising due to the cleft phenotype (such as school absence, social stigmatization and impaired speech and language development), or confounding by the prenatal environment. A clearer understanding of this mechanism will inform development of interventions to improve educational attainment in individuals born with a cleft, which could have wide-ranging knock-on effects on their quality of life.\n\nObjectiveTo assess evidence for the hypothesis that common variant genetic liability to non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (nsCL/P) influences educational attainment.\n\nDesignUsing summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we performed Linkage Disequilibrium (LD)-score regression and two-sample Mendelian randomization to evaluate the relationship between genetic liability to nsCL/P (GWAS n=3,987) and educational attainment (GWAS n=766,345), and intelligence (GWAS n=257,828).\n\nResultsThere was little evidence for shared genetic aetiology between nsCL/P and educational attainment (rg -0.03, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.08, P 0.58; {beta}MR 0.002, 95% CI -0.001 to 0.005, P 0.417) or intelligence (rg -0.01, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.10, P 0.85; {beta}MR 0.002, 95% CI -0.010 to 0.014, P 0.669).\n\nConclusions and relevanceCommon genetic variants are unlikely to predispose individuals born with nsCL/P to low educational attainment or intelligence. This information will help tailor clinical-, school-, social- and family-level interventions to improve educational attainment in this group.\n\nKey PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDo children born with a non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate (nsCL/P) have lower-than average academic achievement because of an underlying genetic predisposition to educational attainment and/or intelligence?\n\nFindingsThere was little evidence for shared common variant genetic correlation between nsCL/P, educational attainment and intelligence.\n\nMeaningCommon genetic variants are unlikely to predispose individuals born with nsCL/P to low educational attainment or intelligence. This information will help tailor clinical-, school-, social- and family-level interventions to improve educational attainment in this group.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Pitch discrimination performance of ferrets and humans on a go/no-go task.

Animal models are widely used to examine the neurophysiological basis of human pitch perception, and it is therefore important to understand the similarities and differences in pitch processing across species. Pitch discrimination performance is usually measured using two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) procedures in humans and go/no-go tasks in animals, potentially confounding human-to-animal comparisons. We have previously shown that pitch discrimination thresholds of ferrets on a 2AFC task are markedly poorer than those reported for go/no-go tasks in other non-human species (Walker et al., 2009). To better compare the pitch discrimination performance of ferret with other species, here we measure pitch change detection thresholds of ferrets and humans on a common, appetitive go/no-go task design. We found that ferrets pitch thresholds were ~10 times larger than that of humans on the go/no-go task, and were within the range of thresholds reported in other non-human species. Interestingly, ferrets thresholds were 100 times larger than human thresholds on a 2AFC pitch discrimination task using the same stimuli. These results emphasize that sensory discrimination thresholds can differ across tasks, particularly for non-human animals. Performance on our go/no-go task is likely to reflect different neurobiological processes than that on our 2AFC task, as the former required the subjects only to detect a pitch change while the latter required them to label the direction of the pitch change.\n\nABBREVIATIONS\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIPitch discrimination thresholds of ferrets were 10 times larger than those of humans on a go/no-go task\nC_LIO_LIFerrets pitch thresholds are similar to those reported for a range of other mammals\nC_LIO_LIPitch thresholds of ferrets, but not humans, were drastically better on the go/no-go task than a 2AFC task using the same stimuli\nC_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2017

Distinct Blood DNA Methylation Profiles In Subtypes Of Orofacial Cleft

BackgroundThere is evidence that different subtypes of orofacial cleft have distinct aetiologies, although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these are unknown. Given the key role of epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation in embryonic development, it is likely that aberrant DNA methylation may also play a part in the development of orofacial clefts.\n\nMethodsIn this study, we explored whether blood samples from children with different cleft subtypes showed distinct DNA methylation profiles.\n\nIn whole blood samples from 150 children from the Cleft Collective cohort study, we measured DNA methylation at over 450,000 sites on the genome. We then carried out epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) to test the association between methylation at each site and cleft subtype (cleft lip only CLO n=50; cleft palate only CPO n=50; cleft lip and palate CLP n=50).\n\nResultsWe found four genomic regions differentially methylated in CLO compared to CLP, 17 in CPO compared to CLP and 294 in CPO compared to CLO. These regions included several mapping to genes that have previously been implicated in the development of orofacial clefts (for example, TBX1, COL11A2, HOXA2, PDGFRA) and over 250 novel associations.\n\nConclusionOur finding of distinct methylation profiles in different cleft subtypes might reflect differences in their aetiologies, with DNA methylation either playing a causal role in development of OFC subtypes or reflecting causal genetic or environmental factors.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2017

A global perspective on bioinformatics training needs

In the last decade, life-science research has become increasingly data-intensive and computational. Nevertheless, basic bioinformatics and data stewardship are still only rarely taught in life-science degree programmes, creating a widening skills gap that spans educational levels and career roles. To better understand this situation, we ran surveys to determine how the skills dearth is affecting the need for bioinformatics training worldwide. Perhaps unsurprisingly, we found that respondents wanted more short courses to help boost their expertise and confidence in data analysis and interpretation. However, it was evident that most respondents appreciated their need for training only after designing their experiments and collecting their data. This is clearly rather late in the research workflow, and suboptimal from a training perspective, as skills acquired to address a specific need at a particular time are seldom retained, engendering a cycle of low confidence in trainees. To ensure that such skill gaps do not continue to create barriers to the progress of research, we argue that universities should strive to bring their life-science curricula into the digital-data era. Meanwhile, the demand for point-of-need training in bioinformatics and data stewardship will grow. While this situation persists, international groups like GOBLET are increasing their efforts to enlarge the community of trainers and quench the global thirst for bioinformatics training.

scientific communication and education↗