Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Davidson, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Davidson, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Foraging as an evidence accumulation process

A canonical foraging task is the patch-leaving problem, in which a forager must decide to leave a current resource in search for another. Theoretical work has derived optimal strategies for when to leave a patch, and experiments have tested for conditions where animals do or do not follow an optimal strategy. Nevertheless, models of patch-leaving decisions do not consider the imperfect and noisy sampling process through which an animal gathers information, and how this process is constrained by neurobiological mechanisms. In this theoretical study, we formulate an evidence accumulation model of patch-leaving decisions where the animal averages over noisy measurements to estimate the state of the current patch and the overall environment. Evidence accumulation models belong to the class of drift diffusion processes and have been used to model decision making in different contexts especially in cognitive and systems neuroscience. We solve the model for conditions where foraging decisions are optimal and equivalent to the marginal value theorem, and perform simulations to analyze deviations from optimal when these conditions are not met. By adjusting the drift rate and decision threshold, the model can represent different \"strategies\", for example an increment-decrement or counting strategy. These strategies yield identical decisions in the limiting case but differ in how patch residence times adapt when the foraging environment is uncertain. To account for sub-optimal decisions, we introduce an energy-dependent utility function that predicts longer than optimal patch residence times when food is plentiful. Our model provides a quantitative connection between ecological models of foraging behavior and evidence accumulation models of decision making. Moreover, it provides a theoretical framework for potential experiments which seek to identify neural circuits underlying patch leaving decisions.

animal behavior and cognition

A quantitative evaluation of MIRU-VNTR typing against whole-genome sequencing for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission: A prospective observational cohort study

SummaryO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSMycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit-Variable Number Tandem Repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing is widely used in high-income countries for Mycobacterium tuberculosis typing. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is known to deliver greater specificity, but no quantitative prospective comparison has yet been undertaken.\n\nMethodsWe studied isolates from the English Midlands, sampled consecutively between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2015. In addition to routinely performed MIRU-VNTR typing, DNA was extracted from liquid cultures and sequenced using Illumina technology. Demographic and epidemiological data were extracted from the Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance system maintained by Public Health England. Closely related samples, defined using a threshold of five single nucleotide variants (SNVs), were compared to samples with identical MIRU-VNTR profiles, with shared epidemiological risk factors, and to those with both characteristics.\n\nFindings1,999 patients were identified for whom at least one M. tuberculosis isolate had been MIRU-VNTR typed and sequenced. Comparing epidemiological risk factors with close genetic relatedness, only coresidence had a positive predictive value of over 5%. Excluding co-resident individuals, 18.6% of patients with identical MIRU-VNTR profiles were within 5 SNVs. Where patients also shared social risk factors and ethnic group, this rose to 48%. Only 8% of MIRU-VNTR linked pairs in lineage 1 were within 5 SNV, compared to 31% in lineage 4.\n\nInterpretationIn the setting studied, MIRU-VNTR typing and epidemiological risk factors are poorly predictive of close genomic relatedness, assessed by SNV. MIRU-VNTR performance varies markedly by lineage.\n\nFundingPublic Health England, National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

microbiology

Genome-wide discovery of somatic coding and regulatory variants in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer originating from mature B-cells. Many known driver mutations are over-represented in one of its two molecular subgroups, knowledge of which has aided in the development of therapeutics that target these features. The heterogeneity of DLBCL determined through prior genomic analysis suggests an incomplete understanding of its molecular aetiology, with a limited diversity of genetic events having thus far been attributed to the activated B-cell (ABC) subgroup. Through an integrative genomic analysis we uncovered genes and non-coding loci that are commonly mutated in DLBCL including putative regulatory sequences. We implicate recurrent mutations in the 3UTR of NFKBIZ as a novel mechanism of oncogene deregulation and found small amplifications associated with over-expression of FC-{gamma} receptor genes. These results inform on mechanisms of NF-{kappa}B pathway activation in ABC DLBCL and may reveal a high-risk population of patients that might not benefit from standard therapeutics.

genomics