Biology subjects

Dardani, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Dardani, C..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Exploring the causal effects of genetic liability to ADHD and Autism on Alzheimer's disease

BackgroundThere are very few studies investigating possible links between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Alzheimers disease and these have been limited by small sample sizes, diagnostic and recall bias. However, neurocognitive deficits affecting educational attainment in individuals with ADHD could be risk factors for Alzheimers later in life while hyper plasticity of the brain in ASD and strong positive genetic correlations of ASD with IQ and educational attainment could be protective against Alzheimers. MethodsWe estimated the bidirectional total causal effects of genetic liability to ADHD and ASD on Alzheimers disease through two-sample Mendelian randomization. We investigated their direct effects, independent of educational attainment and IQ, through Multivariable Mendelian randomization. ResultsThere was limited evidence to suggest that genetic liability to ADHD (OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.02, p=0.39) or ASD (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.01, p=0.70) was associated with risk of Alzheimers disease. Similar causal effect estimates were identified when the direct effects, independent of educational attainment (ADHD: OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01, p=0.07; ASD: OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00, p=0.28) and IQ (ADHD: OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.02. p=0.29; ASD: OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.01, p=0.99), were assessed. Finally, genetic liability to Alzheimers disease was not found to have a causal effect on risk of ADHD or ASD (ADHD: OR=1.12, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.44, p=0.37; ASD: OR=1.19, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.51, p=0.14). ConclusionsIn the first study to date investigating the causal associations between genetic liability to ADHD, ASD and Alzheimers, within an MR framework, we found limited evidence to suggest a causal effect. It is important to encourage future research using ADHD and ASD specific subtype data, as well as longitudinal data in order to further elucidate any associations between these conditions.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Is genetic liability to ADHD and ASD causally linked to educational attainment?

BackgroundIndividuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are at risk of poor educational outcomes. Parental educational attainment has also been associated with risk of ADHD/ASD in the offspring. Despite evidence that ADHD and ASD show genetic links to educational attainment, less is known on the causal nature of the associations and the possible role of IQ. MethodsWe assessed the total causal effects of genetic liability to ADHD/ASD on educational attainment using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). We assessed the possible contribution of IQ to the identified causal effects by estimating the "direct" effects of ADHD/ASD on educational attainment, independent of IQ, using Multivariable MR (MVMR). Reverse direction analyses were performed. The latest GWAS meta-analyses of ADHD, ASD, educational attainment and IQ were used. Causal effect estimates were generated using inverse variance weighted models (IVW). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the estimates and the presence of pleiotropy. ResultsGenetic liability to ADHD had a total (MRIVW:-3.3 months per doubling of liability to ADHD; 95%CI: -4.8 to -1.9; pval= 5*10-6) and direct negative causal effect on educational attainment (MVMRIVW:-1.6 months per doubling of liability to ADHD; 95%CI: -2.5 to -0.6; pval= 4*10-4). There was little evidence of a total causal effect of genetic liability to ASD on educational attainment (MRIVW: 4 days, per doubling of liability to ASD; 95%CI: -4.9 months to 5.6 months; pval= 0.9) but some evidence of a direct effect not via IQ (MVMRIVW:29 days per doubling the genetic liability to ASD; 95%CI: 2 to 48; pval= 0.03). Reverse direction analyses suggested that genetic liability to higher educational attainment was associated with lower risk of ADHD (MRIVWOR: 0.3 per standard deviation (SD) increase; 95%CI: 0.26 to 0.36; pval= 6*10-51), even after IQ was entered in the models (MVMRIVWOR: 0.33 per SD increase; 95%CI: 0.26 to 0.43; pval= 6*10-17). On the contrary, there was evidence consistent with a positive causal effect of genetic liability to higher educational attainment on risk of ASD (MRIVWOR: 1.51 per SD increase; 95%CI: 1.29 to 1.77; pval= 4*10-7), which was found to be largely explained by IQ (MVMRIVWOR per SD increase: 1.24; 95%CI: 0.96 to 1.60; pval= 0.09). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that despite the genetic and phenotypic overlap between ADHD and ASD, they present highly differentiated causal associations with educational attainment. This highlights the necessity for specialized educational interventions for children with ADHD and ASD. Further research is needed in order to decipher whether the identified causal effects reflect parentally transmitted effects, diagnostic masking, or selection bias.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Disentangling causal relationships between inflammatory markers and depression: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

BackgroundThe inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1-Ra), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been associated with depression risk in observational studies. The causal nature of these associations is unclear as conventional observational designs are susceptible to reverse causation and residual confounding. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis uses genetic variants to proxy for risk factors to help elucidate the presence, magnitude, and direction of causal relationships between traits. MethodsWe performed bidirectional two-sample MR to examine causal associations between circulating CRP, IL1-Ra, and IL-6 and major depressive disorder (MDD) in 135,458 cases and 344,901 controls in the Psychiatric Genetics Consortium. Genetic instruments to proxy inflammatory markers and liability to MDD were constructed by obtaining single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these phenotypes in genome-wide association study meta-analyses. Wald ratios and inverse-variance weighted random-effects models were employed to generate causal effect estimates and various sensitivity analyses were performed to examine violations of MR assumptions. ResultsThere was evidence supporting a causal effect of circulating IL-6 on risk of MDD (per natural-log increase: OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96, P=0.007). Higher circulating levels of IL-6 as influenced by variants in the IL6R gene region represent lower cellular binding of IL-6 to its receptor and therefore the present results suggest that IL-6 increases the risk of MDD. We found limited evidence supporting a causal effect of CRP (1.06, 95% CI 0.93-1.22; P=0.36) or IL1-Ra (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87-1.03, P=0.20) on risk of MDD. Reverse direction MR analyses suggested limited evidence for a causal effect of genetic liability to MDD on any of the inflammatory markers examined. ConclusionsThese findings support a causal role of IL-6-related pathways in development of major depressive disorder and suggest the possible efficacy of interleukin-6 inhibition as a therapeutic target for depression.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

ADHD genetic liability and physical health outcomes - A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

ObjectiveAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with a broad range of physical health problems, including cardiometabolic, neurological and immunological conditions. Determining whether ADHD plays a causal role in these associations is of great importance for treatment and prevention but also because comorbid health problems further increase the serious social and economic impacts of ADHD on individuals and their families.\n\nMethodsWe used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to examine the causal relationships between genetic liability for ADHD and previously implicated physical health conditions. 11 genetic variants associated with ADHD were obtained from the latest summary statistics. Consistent effects obtained from IVW, weighted median and MR Egger methods were taken forward for sensitivity analysis, including bidirectional MR and multivariable MR (MVMR).\n\nResultsWe found evidence of a causal effect of genetic liability for ADHD on childhood obesity (OR:1.29 (95% CI:1.02,1.63)) and coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR:1.11 (95% CI:1.03,1.19)) with consistent results across different MR approaches. There was further evidence for a bidirectional relationship between genetic liability for ADHD and childhood obesity. The effect of genetic liability for ADHD on CAD was independent of smoking heaviness but was attenuated when simultaneously controlling for childhood obesity. There was little evidence for a causal effect on other cardiometabolic, immunological, neurological disorders and lung cancer.\n\nConclusionOur findings strengthen the argument for early treatment and support for children with ADHD and their families and especially promoting physical activity and providing them with dietary advice to reduce future risk for developing CAD.\n\nKey Message O_LIEpidemiological studies have reported observational associations between ADHD and adult onset physical health outcomes.\nC_LIO_LIMendelian Randomization can be used to assess causal associations for ADHD on health outcomes that would traditionally require long term follow-up and may suffer confounding\nC_LIO_LIWe found that genetic liability for ADHD was associated with coronary artery disease and there was evidence for a bidirectional association between genetic liability for ADHD and childhood obesity\nC_LIO_LIMultivariable mendelian randomization suggests that the link between genetic liability and coronary artery disease might partially act through childhood obesity but was independent of smoking heaviness\nC_LIO_LIThere was little evidence of a causal of ADHD on other cardiometabolic and immunological diseases.\nC_LI

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Cleft lip/palate and educational attainment: cause, consequence, or correlation? A Mendelian randomization study

ImportancePrevious studies have found that children born with a non-syndromic form of cleft lip and/or palate have lower-than-average educational attainment. These differences could be due to a genetic predisposition to low intelligence and academic performance, factors arising due to the cleft phenotype (such as school absence, social stigmatization and impaired speech and language development), or confounding by the prenatal environment. A clearer understanding of this mechanism will inform development of interventions to improve educational attainment in individuals born with a cleft, which could have wide-ranging knock-on effects on their quality of life.\n\nObjectiveTo assess evidence for the hypothesis that common variant genetic liability to non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (nsCL/P) influences educational attainment.\n\nDesignUsing summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we performed Linkage Disequilibrium (LD)-score regression and two-sample Mendelian randomization to evaluate the relationship between genetic liability to nsCL/P (GWAS n=3,987) and educational attainment (GWAS n=766,345), and intelligence (GWAS n=257,828).\n\nResultsThere was little evidence for shared genetic aetiology between nsCL/P and educational attainment (rg -0.03, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.08, P 0.58; {beta}MR 0.002, 95% CI -0.001 to 0.005, P 0.417) or intelligence (rg -0.01, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.10, P 0.85; {beta}MR 0.002, 95% CI -0.010 to 0.014, P 0.669).\n\nConclusions and relevanceCommon genetic variants are unlikely to predispose individuals born with nsCL/P to low educational attainment or intelligence. This information will help tailor clinical-, school-, social- and family-level interventions to improve educational attainment in this group.\n\nKey PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDo children born with a non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate (nsCL/P) have lower-than average academic achievement because of an underlying genetic predisposition to educational attainment and/or intelligence?\n\nFindingsThere was little evidence for shared common variant genetic correlation between nsCL/P, educational attainment and intelligence.\n\nMeaningCommon genetic variants are unlikely to predispose individuals born with nsCL/P to low educational attainment or intelligence. This information will help tailor clinical-, school-, social- and family-level interventions to improve educational attainment in this group.

genetics↗