Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dao, T. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Dao, T. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

DynamicsPLM: A Dynamics-Enriched Small Protein Language Model for Protein Variant Effect Prediction

Predicting how mutations impact protein function and stability remains a key challenge in computational biology. Current state-of-the-art protein language models (PLMs) primarily scale parameter size on sequence corpora to capture evolutionary constraints but remain blind to the explicit physical dynamics of folded proteins. Conversely, models trained strictly on physical dynamics neglect critical evolutionary sequence statistics. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing DynamicsPLM, a highly parameter-efficient 35-million-parameter model that unifies evolutionary and biophysical representation learning. Utilizing a second-stage, multi-task continual pretraining strategy on over 60,000 proteins, we enrich a foundational sequence encoder with explicit residue-level and pairwise molecular dynamics heads while preserving its original evolutionary knowledge. At inference, DynamicsPLM computes zero-shot mutation effects from sequence alone by balancing an evolutionary plausibility score against a structural dynamics disruption score. Across the massive ProteinGym benchmark and natural variants of the Tsuboyama folding stability dataset, DynamicsPLM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy among all models under 100M parameters, and matches or outperforms several billion-scale sequence-based models of its size. Our findings demonstrate that explicit structural-dynamics supervision provides a parameter-efficient alternative to raw scale. Availability: All codes including data preparation scripts, training and validation recipes, and experimental configurations for LoMuS are available at: https://github.com/kabir-ai2bio-lab/DynamicsPLM.

bioinformatics↗

AlphaFold3 and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Reliable Monomer Prediction, Unpredictable Multimer Performance

AlphaFold3 represents a major advance in protein structure prediction, yet its performance on intrinsically disordered proteins remains uncharacterized. We present the first systematic evaluation of AF3 on disordered systems, revealing a striking dichotomy. For monomers, AF3s pLDDT scores reliably predict disorder (MCC: 0.693), matching AlphaFold2 and rivaling dedicated predictors. This consistency across fundamentally different architectures confirms that disorder prediction emerges from training data, not model design. For multimers, the picture grows complex. Despite comparable aggregate performance (mean DockQ: 0.563 vs 0.571), AF3 and AF2 achieve these results through fundamentally different mechanisms. Conventional structural features explain 58% of AF2s variance but only 42% of AF3s. Users cannot predict when AF3 will succeed or fail from interface properties alone. On disorder-to-order transitions (MFIB benchmark), both models perform equally well, successfully predicting final folded states. Yet seed variance analysis reveals AF3s failures are deterministic: the model converges to identical structures across independent runs, whether correct or incorrect, indicating rigid structural priors override available information. Our findings establish AF3 as reliable for the prediction of monomer disorder but unpredictable for multimers. Architectural innovation alone cannot overcome training data bias. Progress demands disorder-enriched datasets and ensemble sampling, not merely novel architectures.

bioinformatics↗