Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dannhauer, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Dannhauer, M..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Transformer Networks Enable Robust Generalization of Source Localization for EEG Measurements

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWAn electroencephalogram (EEG) is an electrical measurement of brain activity using electrodes placed on the scalp surface. After EEG measurements are collected, numerical methods and algorithms can be employed to analyze these measurements and attempt to identify the source locations of brain activity. These traditional techniques often fail for measured data that are prone to noise. Recent techniques have employed neural network models to solve the localization problem for various use cases and data setups. These approaches, however, make underlying assumptions that make it difficult generalize the results past their original training setups. In this work, we present a transformer-based model for single- and multi-source localization that is specifically designed to deal with difficulties that arise in EEG data. Hundreds of thousands of simulated EEG measurement data are generated from known brain locations to train this machine learning model. We establish a training and evaluation framework for analyzing the effectiveness of the transformer model by explicitly considering the source region density, noise levels, drop out of electrodes, and other factors. Across these vast scenarios, the localization error of the transformer model is consistently lower than the other classical and machine learning approaches. Additionally, we perform a thorough ablation study on the network configuration and training pipeline. The code and data used in this work will be made publicly available upon publication.

neuroscience↗

Using Dual-Coil TMS-EEG to Probe Bilateral Brain Mechanisms in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment

BackgroundA widespread observation in the cognitive neuroscience of aging is that older adults show a more bilateral pattern of task-related brain activation. These observations are based on inherently correlational approaches. The current study represents a targeted assessment of the role of bilaterality using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). ObjectiveWe used a novel bilateral TMS-stimulation paradigm, applied to a group of healthy older adults (hOA) and older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with two aims: First, to elucidate the neurophysiological effects of bilateral neuromodulation, and second to provide insight into the neurophysiological basis of bilateral brain interactions. MethodsElectroencephalography (EEG) was recorded while participants received six forms of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): unilateral and bilateral rTMS trains at an alpha (8 Hz) and beta (18 Hz) frequency, as well as two sham conditions (unilateral, bilateral) mimicking the sounds of TMS. ResultsFirst, time-frequency analyses of oscillatory power induced by TMS revealed that unilateral beta rTMS elicited rhythmic entrainment of cortical oscillations at the same beta-band frequency. Second, both bilateral alpha and bilateral beta stimulation induced a widespread reduction of alpha power. Lastly, healthy older adults showed greater TMS-related reductions in alpha power in response to bilateral rTMS compared to the MCI cohort. ConclusionOverall, these results demonstrate frequency-specific responses to bilateral rTMS in the aging brain, and provide support for inhibitory models of hemispheric interaction across multiple frequency bands.

neuroscience↗

Real-Time Computation of Brain E-Field for Enhanced Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Neuronavigation and Optimization

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) coil placement and pulse wave-form current are often chosen to achieve a specified E-field dose on targeted brain regions. TMS neuronavigation could be improved by including real-time accurate distributions of the E-field dose on the cortex. We introduce a method and develop software for computing brain E-field distributions in real-time enabling easy integration into neuronavigation and with the same accuracy as 1st-order finite element method (FEM) solvers. Initially, a spanning basis set (< 400) of E-fields generated by white noise magnetic currents on a surface separating the head and permissible coil placements are orthogonalized to generate the modes. Subsequently, Reciprocity and Huygens principles are utilized to compute fields induced by the modes on a surface separating the head and coil by FEM, which are used in conjunction with online (real-time) computed primary fields on the separating surface to evaluate the mode expansion. We conducted a comparative analysis of E-fields computed by FEM and in real-time for eight subjects, utilizing two head model types (SimNIBSs headreco and mri2mesh pipeline), three coil types (circular, double-cone, and Figure-8), and 1000 coil placements (48,000 simulations). The real-time computation for any coil placement is within 4 milliseconds (ms), for 400 modes, and requires less than 4 GB of memory on a GPU. Our solver is capable of computing E-fields within 4 ms, making it a practical approach for integrating E-field information into the neuronavigation systems without imposing a significant overhead on frame generation (20 and 50 frames per second within 50 and 20 ms, respectively). O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=96 SRC="FIGDIR/small/564044v1_fig8.gif" ALT="Figure 8"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1520141org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d05835org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4f1aa9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15f7b90_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 8:C_FLOATNO Mean computational time for pre-processing stage (mode and field generation stage) for mri2mesh models (A) and headreco models (B). At any rank (mode), the time is calculated across 8 head models from 8 subjects.) C_FIG

bioengineering↗

Concurrent fMRI demonstrates propagation of TMS effects across task-related networks

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become an important technique in both scientific and clinical practices, and yet our understanding of how the brain responds to TMS is still limited. Concurrent neuroimaging during TMS may bridge this gap, and emerging evidence suggests widespread that modulatory effects of TMS may be best captured through changes in functional connectivity between distributed networks, rather than local changes in cortical activity. However, the relationship between TMS stimulation parameters and evoked changes in functional connectivity is unknown. In this study, 24 healthy volunteers received concurrent TMS-fMRI while performing a dot-motion direction discrimination task. An MR-compatible coil was used to apply trains of three pulses at 10 Hz rTMS over the primary visual cortex (V1) at the onset of the dot stimuli with four levels of stimulation intensity (20%, 40%, 80%, and 120% of resting motor threshold, RMT). Behavioral results demonstrated impairment of motion discrimination at 80% RMT. FMRI results yielded three findings. First, functional connectivity between visual and non-visual areas increased as a function of rTMS intensity. Second, connectivity within the visual network was positively associated with motion accuracy, while the connectivity between visual and non-visual regions was negatively associated with motion accuracy. Lastly, we found that reductions in the similarity between functional and structural connectivity associated with increasing TMS intensity were constrained to the visual network. These findings demonstrate spatially dependent nonlinear effects of TMS intensity on brain functional connectivity that proceed beyond the site of stimulation and influence associated behavior.

neuroscience↗

TAP: Targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of TMS coil placement

ObjectiveTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can modulate brain function via an electric field (E-field) induced in a region of interest (ROI) in the brain. The ROI E-field can be computationally maximized and set to match a specific reference using individualized head models to find the optimal coil placement and stimulus intensity. However, the available software lacks many practical features for prospective planning of TMS interventions and retrospective evaluation of the experimental targeting accuracy. ApproachThe TMS targeting and analysis pipeline (TAP) software uses an MRI/fMRI-derived brain target to optimize coil placement considering experimental parameters such as the subjects hair thickness and coil placement restrictions. The coil placement optimization is implemented in SimNIBS 3.2, for which an additional graphical user interface (TargetingNavigator) is provided to visualize and adjust procedural parameters. The coil optimization process also computes the E-field at the target, allowing the selection of the TMS device intensity setting to achieve a specific E-field strength. The optimized coil placement information is prepared for neuronavigation software, which supports targeting during the TMS procedure. The neuronavigation system can record the coil placement during the experiment, and these data can be processed in TAP to quantify the accuracy of the experimental TMS coil placement and induced E-field. Main resultsTAP was demonstrated in a study consisting of three repetitive TMS sessions in five subjects. TMS was delivered by an experienced operator under neuronavigation with the computationally optimized coil placement. Analysis of the experimental accuracy from the recorded neuronavigation data indicated coil location and orientation deviations up to about 2 mm and 2{degrees}, respectively, resulting in an 8% median decrease in the target E-field magnitude compared to the optimal placement. SignificanceTAP supports navigated TMS with a variety of features for rigorous and reproducible stimulation delivery, including planning and evaluation of coil placement and intensity selection for E-field-based dosing.

neuroscience↗

Dose-dependent enhancement of motion direction discrimination with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex

Despite the widespread use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical care, the underlying mechanisms-of-actions that mediate modulatory effects remain poorly understood. To fill this gap, we studied dose-response functions of TMS for modulation of visual processing. Our approach combined electroencephalography (EEG) with application of single pulse TMS to visual cortex as participants performed a motion perception task. During participants first visit, motion coherence thresholds, 64-channel visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and TMS resting motor thresholds (RMT) were measured. In second and third visits, single pulse TMS was delivered 30 ms before the onset of motion or at the onset latency of the N2 VEP component derived from the first session. TMS was delivered at 0%, 80%, 100%, or 120% of RMT over the site of N2 peak activity, or at 120% over vertex. Behavioral results demonstrated a significant main effect of TMS timing on accuracy, with better performance when TMS was applied at N2-Onset timing versus Pre-Onset, as well as a significant interaction, indicating that 80% intensity produced higher accuracy than other conditions. TMS effects on VEPs showed reduced amplitudes in the 80% Pre-Onset condition, an increase for the 120% N2-Onset condition, and monotonic amplitude scaling with stimulation intensity. The N2 component was not affected by TMS. These findings reveal dose-response relationships between intensity and timing of TMS on visual perception and electrophysiological brain activity, generally indicating greater facilitation at stimulation intensities below RMT.

neuroscience↗

Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting

Background During transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) a coil placed on the scalp is used to non-invasively modulate activity of targeted brain networks via a magnetically induced electric field (E-field). Ideally, the E-field induced during TMS is concentrated on a targeted cortical region of interest (ROI).Objective To improve the accuracy of TMS we have developed a fast computational auxiliary dipole method (ADM) for determining the optimum coil position and orientation. The optimum coil placement maximizes the E-field along a predetermined direction or, alternatively, the overall E-field magnitude in the targeted ROI. Furthermore, ADM can assess E-field uncertainty resulting from precision limitations of TMS coil placement protocols.Method ADM leverages the electromagnetic reciprocity principle to compute rapidly the TMS induced E-field in the ROI by using the E-field generated by a virtual constant current source residing in the ROI. The framework starts by solving for the conduction currents resulting from this ROI current source. Then, it rapidly determines the average E-field induced in the ROI for each coil position by using the conduction currents and a fast-multipole method. To further speed-up the computations, the coil is approximated using auxiliary dipoles enabling it to represent all coil orientations for a given coil position with less than 600 dipoles.Results Using ADM, the E-fields generated in an MRI-derived head model when the coil is placed at 5,900 different scalp positions and 360 coil orientations per position (over 2.1 million unique configurations) can be determined in under 15 minutes on a standard laptop computer. This enables rapid extraction of the optimum coil position and orientation as well as the E-field variation resulting from coil positioning uncertainty.Conclusion ADM enables the rapid determination of coil placement that maximizes E-field delivery to a specific brain target. This method can find the optimum coil placement in under 15 minutes enabling its routine use for TMS. Furthermore, it enables the fast quantification of uncertainty in the induced E-field due to limited precision of TMS coil placement protocols, enabling minimization and statistical analysis of the E-field dose variability.HighlightsAuxiliary dipole method (ADM) optimizes TMS coil placement in under 8 minutesOptimum coil position is up to 14 mm away from conventional targetingOptimum coil orientation is typically near normal to the sulcal wallTMS induced E-field is less sensitive to orientation than position errorsCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

bioengineering↗

Structural controllability predicts functional patterns and neuromodulatory benefits associated with working memory

The brain is an inherently dynamic system, and much work has focused on the ability to modify neural activity through both local perturbations and changes in the function of global network ensembles. Network controllability is a recent concept in network science that purports to predict the influence of individual cortical sites on global network states and state changes, thereby creating a unifying account of local influences on global brain dynamics. Here, we present an integrated set of multimodal brain-behavior relationships, acquired from functional magnetic resonance imaging during a transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention, that demonstrate how network controllability influences network function, as well as behavior. This work helps to outline a clear technique for integrating structural network topology and functional activity to predict the influence of a potential stimulation target on subsequent behaviors and prescribes next steps towards predicting neuromodulatory and behavioral responses after brain stimulation.\n\nHighlights- This study tested the strength of network controllability using fMRI and rTMS\n- Controllability correlates with functional modulation of working memory demand load\n- Controllability is also correlated with the memory improvement from applied rTMS\n- These findings link network control theory with physiology and behavior.\n\n\nIn briefBeynel et al. show that the benefits of functionally targeted brain stimulation on working memory performance can be predicted by network control properties at the stimulated site. Structural controllability and functional activity independently predict this cognitive benefit.\n\nAuthor ContributionsConceptualization & Methodology: L.B, S.W.D., B.L., R.C., L.G.A.; Investigation: L.B., L.D., S.W.D., C.A.C., M.D., H.P., S.H.; Writing--Original Draft: L.B., L.D., S.W.D.; Writing--Review & Editing: L.B., L.D., S.W.D., L.G.A., A.V.P.; Funding Acquisition: S.W.D., R.C., B.L., S.H.L., A.V.P.; Resources: L.G.A., B.L., R.C.; Supervision: L.G.A., S.W.D.

neuroscience↗

Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion perception

The perception of visual motion is dependent on a set of occipitotemporal regions which are readily accessible to neuromodulation. Previous studies using paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS) have provided evidence of the capacity of this type of protocols to modulate cognitive processes. To test whether such cortical modulation can be observed in the visual system, particularly during motion perception, ppTMS was applied to the occipital cortex using both scalp-based and meta-analytic targeting coordinates. In this within-subject, sham-controlled study, fifteen subjects completed two sessions in two consecutive weeks. On the first visit, subject-specific resting motor threshold (RMT) was determined and participants performed an adaptive motion discrimination task to determine individual motion sensitivity. During the second visit, subjects performed the same task with three individualized difficulty levels as two TMS pulses were delivered respectively -150 and -50 ms prior to motion stimulus onset at 120% RMT, under the logic that the cumulative inhibitory effect of these two pulses would alter motion sensitivity as measured by the individually calibrated task. The ppTMS was delivered at one of two locations: 3 cm dorsal and 5 cm lateral to inion (scalp-based coordinate), or at the site of peak activation for \"motion\" according to the NeuroSynth fMRI database (meta-analytic coordinate). Sham stimulation was delivered on one-third of trials and evenly between the two targets. Analyses showed no significant active-versus-sham effects of ppTMS when stimulation was delivered to the meta-analytic (p = 0.15) or scalp-based coordinates (p = 0.17), which were separated by 29 mm on average. Additionally, there was no was significant interaction between ppTMS at either location and task difficulty level (p = 0.12 and p = 0.33, respectively). These findings fail to support the hypothesis that long-interval ppTMS recruits inhibitory processes in motion-sensitive cortex, but must be considered within the limits of the current design choices.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LILong-interval paired-pulse TMS was applied to visual cortex during a motion task\nC_LIO_LIThe ppTMS was delivered according to scalp and meta-analytic coordinates, as well as sham\nC_LIO_LINo effects of active-versus-sham stimulation were observed on motion task performance\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

Site-specific effects of online rTMS during a working memory task in healthy older adults.

The process of manipulating information within working memory (WM) is central to many cognitive functions, but also declines rapidly in old age. Given the importance of WM manipulation for maintaining healthy cognition, improving this process could markedly enhance health-span in older adults. The current pre-registered study tested the potential of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to enhance WM manipulation in healthy elderly adults. Online 5Hz rTMS was applied over the left lateral parietal cortex of 15 subjects to test the hypothesis that active rTMS would significantly improve performance compared to sham stimulation, and that these effects would be most pronounced in conditions with the highest cognitive demand. rTMS was applied while participants performed a delayed-response alphabetization task with two individually-titrated levels of difficulty. Sham stimulation was applied using an electrical sham coil that produced similar clicking sounds and somatosensory sensation as active stimulation but induced negligible effects on the brain. A stimulation site in left lateral parietal cortex was identified from fMRI activation maps and was targeted using individualized electric field modeling, stereotactic neuronavigation, and real-time robotic positioning, allowing optimal coil placement during the stimulation. Contrary to the a priori hypothesis, active rTMS significantly decreased accuracy relative to sham, and only in the hardest difficulty level. These results, therefore, demonstrate engagement of cortical WM processing, but not the anticipated facilitation, and provide a prescription for future studies that may attempt to enhance memory through application of different stimulation parameters.\n\nHighlightsO_LIThis study is one of the first attempts to enhance WM manipulation with online rTMS\nC_LIO_LIOnline 5Hz rTMS and sham were applied over the left parietal cortex of older adults\nC_LIO_LIIndividualized fMRI and electric field modeling were used to optimize targeting\nC_LIO_LIContrary to expectations, rTMS disrupted working memory manipulation abilities\nC_LIO_LIThis demonstrates that parietal cortex is involved in WM and modifiable with rTMS\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Entrains Alpha Oscillations by Preferential Phase Synchronization of Fast-Spiking Cortical Neurons to Stimulation Waveform

Modeling studies predict that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) entrains brain oscillations, yet direct examination has been lacking or potentially contaminated by stimulation artefact. Here we first demonstrate how the posterior parietal cortex drives primary visual cortex and thalamic LP in the alpha-band in head-fixed awake ferrets. The spike-field synchrony is maximum within alpha frequency, and more prominent for narrow-spiking neurons than broad-spiking ones. Guided by a validated model of electric field distribution, we produced electric fields comparable to those in humans and primates (< 0.5 mV/mm). We found evidence to support the model-driven predictions of how tACS entrains neural oscillations as explained by the triangular Arnold tongue pattern. In agreement with the stronger spike-field coupling of narrow-spiking cells, tACS more strongly entrained this cell population. Our findings provide the first in vivo evidence of how tACS with electric field amplitudes used in human studies entrains neuronal oscillators.

neuroscience↗

Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation

BackgroundComputational simulations of the E-field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are increasingly used to understand its mechanisms and to inform its administration. However, characterization of the accuracy of the simulation methods and the factors that affect it is lacking.\n\nObjectiveTo ensure the accuracy of TMS E-field simulations, we systematically quantify their numerical error and provide guidelines for their setup.\n\nMethodWe benchmark the accuracy of computational approaches that are commonly used for TMS E-field simulations, including the finite element method (FEM), boundary element method (BEM), finite difference method (FDM), and coil modeling methods.\n\nResultsTo achieve cortical E-field error levels below 2%, the commonly used FDM and 1st order FEM require meshes with an average edge length below 0.4 mm, whereas BEM and 2nd (or higher) order FEM require edge lengths below 1.5 mm, which is more practical. Coil models employing magnetic and current dipoles require at least 200 and 3,000 dipoles, respectively. For thick solid-conductor coils and frequencies above 3 kHz, winding eddy currents may have to be modeled.\n\nConclusionBEM, FDM, and FEM methods converge to the same solution. However, FDM and 1st order FEM converge slowly with increasing mesh resolution; therefore, the use of BEM or 2nd (or higher) order FEM is recommended. In some cases, coil eddy currents must be modeled. Both electric current dipole and magnetic dipole models of the coil current can be accurate with sufficiently fine discretization.\n\nFundingResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers RF1MH114268 and R01NS088674-S1. The content of current research is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIFDM and 1st order FEM with 1.5 mm average mesh edge length have numerical errors above 7%.\nC_LIO_LIBEM or 2nd order FEM are most efficient for achieving numerical errors < 2%.\nC_LIO_LICoil wire cross-section must be accounted to achieve E-field errors below < 2%.\nC_LIO_LICoil eddy currents can account for > 2% of E-field when very brief pulses are used.\nC_LI

bioengineering↗