Czerwinska, U. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2018

Independent component analysis provides clinically relevant insights into the biology of melanoma patients

The integration of publicly available and new patient-derived transcriptomic datasets is not straightforward and requires specialized approaches to deal with heterogeneity at technical and biological levels. Here we present a methodology that can overcome technical biases, predict clinically relevant outcomes and identify tumour-related biological processes in patients using previously collected large reference datasets. The approach is based on independent component analysis (ICA) - an unsupervised method of signal deconvolution. We developed parallel consensus ICA that robustly decomposes merged new and reference datasets into signals with minimal mutual dependency. By applying the method to a small cohort of primary melanoma and control samples combined with a large public melanoma dataset, we demonstrate that our method distinguishes cell-type specific signals from technical biases and allows to predict clinically relevant patient characteristics. Cancer subtypes, patient survival and activity of key tumour-related processes such as immune response, angiogenesis and cell proliferation were characterized. Additionally, through integration of transcriptomes and miRNomes, the method identified biological functions of miRNAs, which would otherwise not be possible.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Determining the optimal number of independent components for reproducible transcriptomic data analysis

BackgroundIndependent Component Analysis (ICA) is a method that models gene expression data as an action of a set of statistically independent hidden factors. The output of ICA depends on a fundamental parameter: the number of components (factors) to compute. The optimal choice of this parameter, related to determining the effective data dimension, remains an open question in the application of blind source separation techniques to transcriptomic data.\n\nResultsHere we address the question of optimizing the number of statistically independent components in the analysis of transcriptomic data for reproducibility of the components in multiple runs of ICA (within the same or within varying effective dimensions) and in multiple independent datasets. To this end, we introduce ranking of independent components based on their stability in multiple ICA computation runs and define a distinguished number of components (Most Stable Transcriptome Dimension, MSTD) corresponding to the point of the qualitative change of the stability profile. Based on a large body of data, we demonstrate that a sufficient number of dimensions is required for biological interpretability of the ICA decomposition and that the most stable components with ranks below MSTD have more chances to be reproduced in independent studies compared to the less stable ones. At the same time, we show that a transcriptomics dataset can be reduced to a relatively high number of dimensions without losing the interpretability of ICA, even though higher dimensions give rise to components driven by small gene sets.\n\nConclusionsWe suggest a protocol of ICA application to transcriptomics data with a possibility of prioritizing components with respect to their reproducibility that strengthens the biological interpretation. Computing too few components (much less than MSTD) is not optimal for interpretability of the results. The components ranked within MSTD range have more chances to be reproduced in independent studies.

bioinformatics↗